- Joined
- Apr 28, 2009
- Messages
- 7,370
- Reaction score
- 3,469
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
“Islamic Refugee” With Gas Pipeline Plans Arrested in New Mexico Border County
[/h] JUNE 15, 2016
Police in a U.S. town bordering Mexico have apprehended an undocumented, Middle Eastern woman in possession of the region’s gas pipeline plans, law enforcement sources tell Judicial Watch. Authorities describe the woman as an “Islamic refugee” pulled over during a traffic stop by a deputy sheriff in Luna County, New Mexico which shares a 54-mile border with Mexico. County authorities alerted the U.S. Border Patrol and the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) Joint Terrorism Task Forces (JTTF) has been deployed to the area to investigate, sources with firsthand knowledge of the probe confirm.
One of those "widows" from Obama's "Widows and Orphans".
[h=2]
[url=http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2016/06/islamic-refugee-gas-pipeline-plans-arrested-new-mexico-border-county/]?Islamic Refugee? With Gas Pipeline Plans Arrested in New Mexico Border County - Judicial Watch
Makes one think how many of these "refugees" are in reality terrorists. Or how many muslims are Sharia compliant and sympathize with terrorists in the US?
Oh boy! Would not surprise me if this comes out as another BS story from Judicial Watch...
But to answer your question: "“The United States has resettled 784,000 refugees since September 11, 2001,” Newland wrote in a recent op-ed. “In those 14 years, exactly three resettled refugees have been arrested for planning terrorist activities—and it is worth noting two were not planning an attack in the United States and the plans of the third were barely credible.” This Chart Is The Perfect Rebuttal To Governors Who Won't Take In Syrian Refugees | ThinkProgress
:lamo
It's obvious then. The Regime is not doing their job.
There not doing their job by 0 resettled refugees in the US not committing any terrorist attacks?
You were the one that said, "Makes one think how many of these "refugees" are in reality terrorists.". One is a terrorist for committing terrorism....Who said "committing?"
You were the one that said, "Makes one think how many of these "refugees" are in reality terrorists.". One is a terrorist for committing terrorism....
FYI
Nearly 70 are arrested in America over ISIS plots and they include refugees | Daily Mail Online
I didn't read the article, but it appears you are full of propaganda. To put it nicely:lamo
But to answer your question: "“The United States has resettled 784,000 refugees since September 11, 2001,”
Of which 780,000 were military-age men and were vetted as professionally as the Orlando pos was handled by the FBI, with all the info right there?
Is there anything your government can do that is actually to the benefit of the US?
If so, please do tell.
Of which 780,000 were military-age men and were vetted as professionally as the Orlando pos was handled by the FBI, with all the info right there?
Is there anything your government can do that is actually to the benefit of the US?
If so, please do tell.
Oh boy! Would not surprise me if this comes out as another BS story from Judicial Watch...
But to answer your question: "“The United States has resettled 784,000 refugees since September 11, 2001,” Newland wrote in a recent op-ed. “In those 14 years, exactly three resettled refugees have been arrested for planning terrorist activities—and it is worth noting two were not planning an attack in the United States and the plans of the third were barely credible.” This Chart Is The Perfect Rebuttal To Governors Who Won't Take In Syrian Refugees | ThinkProgress
Five have been charged, none have committed acts of terror in the United States or planned to take violent action in the United States.. I'd say that's pretty damn dood vetting.
The real issue is not how many have, it's not knowing how many will and if sacrificing innocent American lives is worth being "compassionate"
So now you want to ban refugees resettled in the US for the sole fact that they are "military-age men"? And how does this also serve the fact that 99.999358974359% of them dont support terrorism and only .000641025641% of them have supported terrorism in one form or another, but none of them were looking to partake in a violent action actually inside in the US? All of them were either trying to reach Syria to join ISIS or al-Nusra, or they were attempting to send money and supplies....Of which 780,000 were military-age men and were vetted as professionally as the Orlando pos was handled by the FBI, with all the info right there?
Is there anything your government can do that is actually to the benefit of the US?
If so, please do tell.
Actually the ThinkProgress article is clearly cited and the quote I used is from Migration Policy, which is an "independent, nonpartisan, nonprofit think tank in Washington, DC dedicated to analysis of the movement of people worldwide"I'd like to start by pointing out the irony in your post.
You insinuate Judicial Watch is a BS tabloid news org, then you supply an article from Think Progress, really!
I think you first need to understand what a "straw man argument" actually is...But my real point is your straw man argument.
Its pretty relevant when we are discussing the refugee process and population of our country. If we want to get an accurate portrayal of the refugee population and if they actively support terrorism, why not look at the current population and a case analyis, because after-all havent Islamic terrorists been waging Jihad on us for a while now, especially since 9/11?How many refugees who have been caught being radicalized and arrested for terrorism is irrelevent.
Oh the great unknown eh? Gotta live in constant fear because of the great "might"? Good thing we have an incredibly long vetting process, right? After all if someone really wanted to get into the US and commit terrorist acts they would not become a refugee, because 1.)the chance they would actually get selected by the UN refugee relocation process is less than 1%, and 2.)the vetting process and security check process can take up to two years (i believe) and they would most likely get caught in that vetting process. IF one wanted to commit a terrorist act in the US they would do what most of the 9/11 hijackers did, attempt to get student visas and work visas.The real issue is not how many have, it's not knowing how many will and if sacrificing innocent American lives is worth being "compassionate"
Nope. My article is to point out that throughout time the refugees who have been resettled in the US, 99.999358974359% of them, have never been charged with supporting terrorism.Your article is meant to deceive readers into thinking there is a near non existent threat from refugees, and that is an outright lie.
1.)To mirror a earlier point. Islamic terrorists been waging Jihad on us for a while now, especially since 9/11, and we have resettled hundreds of thousands of them....Using stats like "since 911 only three refugees were arrested" is the first giveaway.
911 was 15 yrs ago, but ISIS is the real threat to the US, and it is barely a year old.
Wise up.
We are talking about the refugee process in the USA, not Europe. To compare two different refugee resettlement processes is dishonest.Nato commander: Isis ‘spreading like cancer’ among refugees
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/mar/01/refugees-isis-nato-commander-terrorists
Terrorism Suspects Are Posing as Refugees, Germany Says
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/06/world/europe/germany-refugees-isis.html?_r=0
HOW ISIS SMUGGLES TERRORISTS AMONG SYRIAN REFUGEES
http://www.newsweek.com/how-isis-smuggles-terrorists-among-syrian-refugees-453039
One of those "widows" from Obama's "Widows and Orphans".
All she has to do now is get pregnant, and she is in - undeportable. And we are out of big bucks for the medical care for her and the anchor bastard.
So now you want to ban refugees resettled in the US for the sole fact that they are "military-age men"?
"My government"? Is it not your government as well? But anyways, yea there is, and they do it just about everyday in one form or another...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?