Neo.
Neoconseratives and neoliberals are pretty much the same thing, they really only differ by a small degree, and mostly in social policy.
No they didn't. China didn't "instantly" do anything, it's been a very slow conversion to private enterprise (30 years or so), and it's still officially a communist nation.
Nope. Inflation caused central banks to create more money.
as Friedman said before he won his Nobel Prize. Inflation is everywhere and always an monetary phenomenon" i.e. it has nothing to do with shortage. Who need a child to reinvent the wheel? Go take your first econ course!! Why ruin quality of debate here?Nope. Any shortage of goods can cause inflation.
.
If every producer of a particular product except for one stopped producing, you don't think that remaining producer would jack prices up?
.
you're just being obtuse. Understand?
issue is pragmatists who are socialist or capitalist?? Hillary wants free college. She a standard libcommie, and that was after Barry spent 8 years growing the govt to biggest level ever. Its never enough when you're a libcommie always needing to buy new votes is it?
Norman Thomas ( socialist presidential candidate)
The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.
I would describe Hillary as a neoconservative and Bernie as a FDR style progressive.
The first part of your quote makes no sense to what you quoted me on, why do I have to ask for clarity? Evidence? Look at history, Cuba perhaps? Afghanistan holds the worlds largest deposits of Lithium, Bolivia the2nd most, wait until Bolivia puts in rail lines and doesn't cooperate. The USA is famous for destabilizing other govts. of course the media won't come out and say it but try some research before you offer me your money.
Don't you understand?There is no such thing as a "libcommie". It's an idiotic term. The rest of your post is just you having a hysterical meltdown.
Don't you understand?
They get to call you "libcommie", "communist", "Marxist", and all that stuff, but it's YOU that's the PC snowflake no matter what.
Most of the right lives in that fantasy bubble I'm afraid."James972" can not be used as a typical example of any ideological stance though. He simply doesn't comprehend reality and exists in his own fantasy bubble
There is no such thing as a "libcommie". It's an idiotic term.
Most of the right lives in that fantasy bubble I'm afraid.
.
Hillary and Bernie run the Party, one a lib and one a commie, so libcommie is good term to describe Party today. How would describe it more accurately?
Jefferson lived in a fantasy bubble because he wanted freedom from big liberal govt?
I would describe you as “delusional”. I would describe Hilary as a “Democrat” and Bernie as a “socialist”.
Based on the very important distinction between favoring "debt free" college and favoring "free" college one would suppose. We essentially have two major political parties in the USA, with more claiming to belong to neither, the party for a bigger federal government and the party for a huge federal government.
Based on the very important distinction between favoring "debt free" college and favoring "free" college one would suppose. We essentially have two major political parties in the USA, with more claiming to belong to neither, the party for a bigger federal government and the party for a huge federal government.
We've tried having a tiny, ineffectual government. It didn't work well. At all.
We've tried having a tiny, ineffectual government. It didn't work well. At all.
when did we try it?? I wonder why the liberal forgot to say and why he forgot to say how big he wants the govt to be?? Its never big enough for a liberal of course. Biggest ever when Obama took over all he wanted and did was to make it bigger still and now that's all Bernie Hillary want too. Do you understand they always need more welfare to buy my votes
Well, first we tried the Articles of Confederation, which created a very very very very very weak government and was dismissed by the founders as totally unworkable as time went on.
totally unworkable?? if so Constitution would have been an easy pass but far from it.
Great Depression ended the days of weak government forever.
".
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?