- Joined
- Jul 24, 2011
- Messages
- 68,591
- Reaction score
- 67,436
- Location
- USA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
So we're not allowed to call out early-stage authoritarianism. Got it.
So reading this thread... The whole literal-hitler/fascist/nazi thing is not going away is it?
Even though it was certainly part of why the election was lost for the left. Crescendoing all the way up to Madison Square Garden rally etc...
No were gonna triple down and crank up the new ridiculous narratives.
Sigh.
So reading this thread... The whole literal-hitler/fascist/nazi thing is not going away is it?
Even though it was certainly part of why the election was lost for the left. Crescendoing all the way up to Madison Square Garden rally etc...
No were gonna triple down and crank up the new ridiculous narratives.
Sigh.
Not since Trump sent a bunch of people to life imprisonment in a Latin American concentration camp without any gesture of due process. How can it go away now?So reading this thread... The whole literal-hitler/fascist/nazi thing is not going away is it?
Not since Trump sent a bunch of people to life imprisonment in a Latin American concentration camp without any gesture of due process. How can it go away now?
Based on what data?
This is the problem.
Your George Floyd "protests" were an assault on the whole of America and were a persistent assault on America that went on for the better part of a year. While the Insurrection Act wasn't declared at that time there was absolutely justification for doing so. I multiple cities we saw elected leaders not only rein in police that were addressing the threats but also KNEEL IN SOLIDARITY with the violent gangs. J6 was a pimple on the butt of a gnat compared to all that but because the political left has ZERO integrity, it was treated as if it was "worse that Pearl Harbor". Now you're complaining that Trump has sent in military forces to protect federal property so that LAPD can actually do their job and address the threat against civilians. That threat against civilians, it should be noted, is because left wing political activists have managed to get it in their head that anyone that sets foot on American soil, no matter what the circumstances, is entitled to effective citizenship! Let me ask you, if anyone here illegally gets all the rights and privileges of a citizen then why do we even have citizenship? If there is no benefit in the US to being a US citizen (other than paying taxes) the why should we even have such a hateful, corrupt and abusive concept of "citizenship"?So what?
If an entire city block can burn down in a matter of hours due to sustained winds is it no big deal?
You of course have a link for this, right?Now add that to the 11-12 million who were already here. 19-20 million is a more accurate number. Could even be higher. The far left wants to keep their blue state cities blue for more representation in the federal government. That's why they use this demographic as their pawns, they are numbers for them.
I multiple cities we saw elected leaders not only rein in police that were addressing the threats
KNEEL IN SOLIDARITY with the violent gangs.
J6 was a pimple on the butt of a gnat compared to all that but because the political left has ZERO integrity, it was treated as if it was "worse that Pearl Harbor".
Now you're complaining that Trump has sent in military forces to protect federal property so that LAPD can actually do their job and address the threat against civilians.
That threat against civilians, it should be noted, is because left wing political activists have managed to get it in their head that anyone that sets foot on American soil, no matter what the circumstances, is entitled to effective citizenship! Let me ask you, if anyone here illegally gets all the rights and privileges of a citizen then why do we even have citizenship? If there is no benefit in the US to being a US citizen (other than paying taxes) the why should we even have such a hateful, corrupt and abusive concept of "citizenship"?
LOL!....The whole point of bringing in the Marines is to escalate the tension. Eventually, it will reach critical mass, something will spark a violent clash, and that will be used to implement martial law. From that point, public protests will be outlawed and dealt with severely.
Yes, you have no empathy for the innocent people having their businesses burned. You had already made that clear.So your business was burned down or were you speaking figuratively?
Is this an issue with you are were you burned out?
Yes, you have no empathy for the innocent people having their businesses burned. You had already made that clear.
So is that the reason liberal/progressives/democrat want illegal aliens to stay in California? If all the illegal aliens were deported out of California they would lose a couple seats in Congress. I see your reasoning.Yep, congressional seats are based on population (via the 10 year census), which includes illegal aliens.
And when nothing happens and you come out from under your bed, hopefully you will start to question some of the premises you hold that are clearly unhinged.Again, not a lib.
Again, coming from a law enforcer's threat assessment professional take on what is within the realm of the possible. Likely is a different story but I would put is at a solid 3 out of 10 that Trump is capable of using Marshall Law at least regionally and 7 out of 10 that he would claim insurrection to impose local use of troops to make arrests. He has already stated he would invoke the latter, which is why I make it at over a 66% chance he would make good on the threat given an excuse to do so.
We'll see what happens on Saturday.
California is monumentally underrepresented in Congress even with immigrants, most of whom are only illegal because the government refuses to fund enough courts and judges to address their requests for asylum. It would cost less to fund the needed courts than what we pay for in walls, fences, concertina wire in the Rio, surveillance systems, border patrol, ICE, rioting caused by haters on both sides, time wasted in Congress arguing over "illegals" problem and lost tax dollars.So is that the reason liberal/progressives/democrat want illegal aliens to stay in California? If all the illegal aliens were deported out of California they would lose a couple seats in Congress. I see your reasoning.
So you think we should fund enough courts and judges to find out the somewhere around 20+ million illegal aliens need asylum...or 20+ illegal aliens are trying to scam the system with an asylum claim. How many courts or judges would need to handle the immigration problem especially when most illegals when ordered to deport don't leave. For example the so called 'Maryland Man' was ordered deported two times and never left the country.ht.
California is monumentally underrepresented in Congress even with immigrants, most of whom are only illegal because the government refuses to fund enough courts and judges to address their requests for asylum. It would cost less to fund the needed courts than what we pay for in walls, fences, concertina wire in the Rio, surveillance systems, border patrol, ICE, rioting caused by haters on both sides, time wasted in Congress arguing over "illegals" problem and lost tax dollars.
I agree, we have created a problem so huge that it's impossible for the courts to resolve as should have been many years ago. The day after Ronald Reagan made all illegal immigrants citizens he should have funded the necessary immigration courts. He didn't and we again have the same huge problem.So you think we should fund enough courts and judges to find out the somewhere around 20+ million illegal aliens need asylum...or 20+ illegal aliens are trying to scam the system with an asylum claim. How many courts or judges would need to handle the immigration problem especially when most illegals when ordered to deport don't leave. For example the so called 'Maryland Man' was ordered deported two times and never left the country.
And when nothing happens and you come out from under your bed, hopefully you will start to question some of the premises you hold that are clearly unhinged.
Actually when Reagan granted legal status to illegal aliens he did because Democrats who held both houses promised they would fund the building of the wall...of course they never had an attention of avocation tax money for the project.I agree, we have created a problem so huge that it's impossible for the courts to resolve as should have been many years ago. The day after Ronald Reagan made all illegal immigrants citizens he should have funded the necessary immigration courts. He didn't and we again have the same huge problem.
Not sure why you say 'we' as it was all on the Biden administration who created this mess with his open border policy. Now when the Trump administration is trying to clear up the illegal alien problem the left is trying to make it worst. Witness the not so 'peaceful' protesters in our cities.We created this problem and now we're blaming the victims of our decision not to adequately fund immigration courts. Suppose you and I came across the border together; we followed the law and signed up for Asylum status; we waited and waited for court dates that never came; ran out of money; got jobs; got married to nice girls; bought a homes; had kids; paid taxes; wouldn't you be angry if armed men came looking to put us in jail. ............. with no due process, as promised in the Constitution. I know I'd be beyond angry.
Actually when Reagan granted legal status to illegal aliens he did because Democrats who held both houses promised they would fund the building of the wall...of course they never had an attention of avocation tax money for the project.
Not sure why you say 'we' as it was all on the Biden administration who created this mess with his open border policy. Now when the Trump administration is trying to clear up the illegal alien problem the left is trying to make it worst. Witness the not so 'peaceful' protesters in our cities.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?