We must keep in mind though that a temporary ban on Muslim immigrants, some of whom want to cut our heads off while we are alive, is not much like herding 6 million Jews into concentration camps
Yes, actually it kind of is. In both cases, an irrational fear of a few others is being used to unjustifiably hurt thousands, and give a fascist bully control of nuclear weapons. Already we're seeing Mexicans rounded up and being hauled off to camps. For now they're just being deported, but eventually that alone won't be good enough, and a final solution will be floated by this administration.
, starting a world war of naked aggression that kills 60 million, or enslaving the black race. I mean, really??
The rest of us can read the tea leaves. Hitler didn't murder 10 million Jews on day one. He didn't put starting WWII into his campaign speeches. It started with putting Germany First, and Making Germany Great Again. It started with simple discrimination. Making jews wear a star just so that people could recognize them. Make sure to avoid their businesses, and not surve them if they tried to come into yours. Very similar to what the Christian Conservatives want to be able to do with Gay people. Of course blacks, and Mexicans don't really need to wear a star, you can recognize them by their skin color.
WWII didn't start until 1939. Hitler seized control in 1931 and didn't gain full dictatorship control until 1934. Horrible evils like we saw from Hitler, the American Civil War. They don't happen overnight. Tensions build slowly over time, and leaders use the tension to justify more power to control it, and keep it at bay. Eventually some event tips the scales. Look at 9/11 and the Patriot Act that followed. Imagine what could happen if another serious terrorist attack carried out by Muslims were to hit the United States. What powers would angry islamophobes be willing to let Trump have?
Imagine some kind of mass shooting carried out by an illegal immigrant who's angry about the way Trump is treating Mexicans. Trump discriminates against a group, that group gets angry about it, and protests. A few of those protests turn violent, and it's then used to justifed action against the whole group. We've already seen that with BLM. On the whole BLM is a group of peaceful protestors, with valid reasons for being angry about the way their people have been treated by members of the government. A few get out of control, and turn violent, destroy property, and conservatives are trying to paint the entire group as a terrorist organization. What if they succeed?
However, voting for an open socialist like Sanders when socialism killed 200 million people,
Socialism killed nobody. Some people who prescribed to old-school socialism might have, but socialism in and of itself is just an economic system. Fascism, on the other hand, is specifically a system that uses bullying, violence, and force to benefit a majority at the expense of minorities. The types of ideas that Sanders has supported have been implemented throughout most of Europe to excellent results without any need for dictatorships to be formed or people murdered. Facism on the other hand inevitably leads to a tryant attempting to seize control, and the murder of any one that attempts to oppose it.
The longer this piece of **** is in power the more inevitable an attempt to seize control will become. He's already implementing the same initial steps as Hilter and every other tyranical dictator that has attempted to seize power. The first step is to undermine the media, and convince people they're all liars when in reality Trump is the one lying. At this point Trump could do anything he wanted to, and the media would be unable to warn 40% of the country he's doing it because they won't believe them.
