• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is this SCOTUS’s last chance to prove it is impartial?

W

WisconIndependent

DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 3, 2023
Messages
2,347
Reaction score
3,057
Gender
Male
The SCOTUS is taking up the Trump’s tariff plan. By just taking it up they seem to be pointing out that they will once again back Trump on anything he wants to do no matter how it violates our laws and constitution. So will they once again show their political partiality?
 
WisconIndependent said:
The SCOTUS is taking up the Trump’s tariff plan. By just taking it up they seem to be pointing out that they will once again back Trump on anything he wants to do no matter how it violates our laws and constitution. So will they once again show their political partiality?
Click to expand...

That ship sailed long ago.

MAGA.
 
WisconIndependent said:
The SCOTUS is taking up the Trump’s tariff plan. By just taking it up they seem to be pointing out that they will once again back Trump on anything he wants to do no matter how it violates our laws and constitution. So will they once again show their political partiality?
Click to expand...
Why are you asking? You've already decided on your answer.
 
WisconIndependent said:
The SCOTUS is taking up the Trump’s tariff plan. By just taking it up they seem to be pointing out that they will once again back Trump on anything he wants to do no matter how it violates our laws and constitution. So will they once again show their political partiality?
Click to expand...

That case should be interesting. IMHO, it will allow the SCOTUS to (attempt to?) define (decide or limit?) what constitutes “a national emergency” and what (if any) limits are placed on the meaning of allowing the executive to “regulate” foreign trade (for the duration of that emergency).
 
Insert Lucy football meme here.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom