• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

IS THIS A NEW LOW FOR PRO-CHOICE ADVOCATES

Did Newsom just kill his chance to be president by stooping so low by using Jesus’s words to promote


  • Total voters
    23
The point of pro-choice laws is that we are entitled to different opinions and don't have to share the same one.
You need laws to hold your own opinion?
 
Those who feel the need to force their beliefs on others.
Thank you for the clarification. Of course, those who are pro-choice are not any more entitled to force their beliefs on others, and I'm sure you acknowledge this too.
 
I cited fact, not opinion. Your rejection of facts does not change them.
I'm not sure you can distinguish between opinions and facts. But please tell me what facts I have rejected, and cite the post(s) in which I have.
 
I'm not sure you can distinguish between opinions and facts. But please tell me what facts I have rejected, and cite the post(s) in which I have.
The fact that there is no baby in an abortion and that a woman's choice is no one's business, post 23.
 
Biblical Christianity. It’s the only way. It’s not ugly. It conforms people to Christ. The problem is you don’t like the truth. That’s no one’s fault but yours.
Biblical Christianity. It's the way for some but not everybody. It's not ugly if it minds its own business. The problem is you don't believe in freedom of religion. That's the truth and you don't like it.

There fixed that for you.
 
Abortion isn’t a need. It’s a convenience.
You know, when you don't have a uterus, you've never been pregnant, you're a clueless Christian male that refuses to learn anything about women, poverty and abortion you really don't have the chops to be defining abortion for women.
 
Last edited:
Thankfully - not all christians pay any attention what-so-ever to what a few moronic talking-heads, posing as christians, say on Fauxnews.
How would you know what Christians do?
 
The fact that there is no baby in an abortion and that a woman's choice is no one's business, post 23.
Sorry, but these aren't facts; they're opinions. Yours.
 
Thank you for the clarification. Of course, those who are pro-choice are not any more entitled to force their beliefs on others, and I'm sure you acknowledge this too.

What do pro-choice "believers" force on anyone else? We support each individual woman deciding for herself what she needs.

How is a choice enabling women to follow their own beliefs "force?"
 
What do pro-choice "believers" force on anyone else? We support each individual woman deciding for herself what she needs.

How is a choice enabling women to follow their own beliefs "force?"
Whatever you say, Lursa. I asked Hari Seldon for a clarification and then expanded what he said. Trying to impose one's will/opinion on others is not exclusive to any one side of any issue.
 
Too funny, Gordy. Okay, embarrassing too, but have it your way.
Clearly you can't refute my facts and then engage in that nonsense. Yes, you should be embarrassed.
 
1664302065050.png

Biblical Christianity. It’s the only way. It’s not ugly. It conforms people to Christ. The problem is you don’t like the truth. That’s no one’s fault but yours.

2nd Corinthians 11:13-15​

For such men are false apostles, deceitful workmen, disguising themselves as apostles of Christ.
And no wonder, for even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light.
So it is no surprise if his servants, also, disguise themselves as servants of righteousness.
Their end will correspond to their deeds.

1) In "The 7 Woes," Christ saved His harshest criticism not for the world's "garden-variety" sinners, but directed it squarely at those self-righteous Scribes and Pharisees - who in reality were more corrupt than those same "unwashed masses" whom they held in contempt!

2) It was those same Scribes and Pharisees, claiming to represent God, who viewed Christ as an ongoing threat and were instrumental in pressuring the Roman governor to have Him crucified!

3) Every generation has experienced its fair share of "false prophets" who claim to possess the self-proclaimed moral authority to place themselves on a "religious pedestal" - then proceed to berate the rest of us in the name of God!

4) The threat posed by "false prophets" represents a major, ongoing theme throughout the Bible - the Old and New Testaments have devoted no less than 181 verses as a reminder to the Christian "Elect" to be constantly vigilant when it comes to these "ravenous wolves in sheep's clothing!"
 
Last edited:
Whatever you say, Lursa. I asked Hari Seldon for a clarification and then expanded what he said. Trying to impose one's will/opinion on others is not exclusive to any one side of any issue.

We're discussing abortion and I asked you to clarify the bold. What are pro-choice advocates forcing on anyone?
 
Too funny, Gordy. Okay, embarrassing too, but have it your way.

Why do you come here, post a couple of drive-bys, and then refuse to engage in discussion? I think people have been mostly addressing you civilly.
 
Why do you come here, post a couple of drive-bys, and then refuse to engage in discussion? I think people have been mostly addressing you civilly.
I'd say because he lets emotion cloud his ability to be civil and rational. Look no further than the tone and quality of his posts to see how apparent that is.
 
I'd say because he lets emotion cloud his ability to be civil and rational. Look no further than the tone and quality of his posts to see how apparent that is.

Nota is a 'she'.
 
Sorry, referring to people as 'he' is a force of habit.

She is committed to her religious beliefs against abortion and has led prayers outside of clinics.

(anyone should be able to see that this 👆 is a 100% neutral statement)
 
Biblical Christianity. It's the way for some but not everybody. It's not ugly if it minds its own business. The problem is you don't believe in freedom of religion. That's the truth and you don't like it.

There fixed that for you.
I believe in free will. God gives us a choice. As for religion, Jesus said he is the only way to heaven. I believe him so I repeat what he said. That’s the truth and you don’t like it.
 
Back
Top Bottom