Is There Life On Mars?

[zyzygy]

Can we please confine the theological squabbles to the theology forum?

 

[Ploughboy]

After terraforming the soil would not be dead. We would take care of that.

Oh please tell me how?

 

[zyzygy]

Oh please tell me how?

Add nutrients to it. It's all quite simple.

 

[Ploughboy]

The Lord works in mysterious ways... why can't evolution be a mysterious way? It seems pretty mysterious to me.

"In the beginning God ____ the heavens and the earth."

Which word or phrase belongs in the blank:

1. created

2. accidentally caused

 

[Ploughboy]

Add nutrients to it. It's all quite simple.

Add nutrients to it? I'm not sure how that can be done on a dead planet? Does this terraforming idea come with any science by chance?

 

[zyzygy]

Add nutrients to it? I'm not sure how that can be done on a dead planet? Does this terraforming idea come with any science by chance?

Look up the meaning of the word terraforming.

 

[Ploughboy]

Look up the meaning of the word terraforming.

From an atheist website
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terraforming

Definition
https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/terraforming

I knew this already. But it doesn't tell me how we go about putting nutrients in the soil of Mars which is why I asked you to explain it. So you believe nutrients can be added to the soil. Why is it you believe this is possible?

 

[zyzygy]

From an atheist website
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terraforming

Definition
https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/terraforming

I knew this already. But it doesn't tell me how we go about putting nutrients in the soil of Mars which is why I asked you to explain it. So you believe nutrients can be added to the soil. Why is it you believe this is possible?

It is not possible with the technology that we have now. On other threads members here say that technologically advanced aliens visit us because they have faster than light travel. One day we may have the technology that will enable us to bring dead planets back to life.

 

[Ploughboy]

It is not possible with the technology that we have now. On other threads members here say that technologically advanced aliens visit us because they have faster than light travel. One day we may have the technology that will enable us to bring dead planets back to life.

First of all, you can't have any technological advances like that is modern civilization collapses which liberals want to see happen through their rabid support for socialism and Islam. Secondly, no amount of technology will resurrect dead red. Are you speaking in terms of fantasy or science? I asked you before to explain how Mars is gonna be brought back to life. You only went as far as to say we can provide nutrients to the soil but didn't say how. The how explanation is what is most important because I am convinced it cannot happen and all these decades of talking about have proven evolutionists do not understand science.

 

[Ploughboy]

NASA made plans to restore Mars back in 2000 and here is proof from their site
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/ames/news/releases/2000/00_68AR.html

So these evolutionists at NASA actually believed it was possible. I knew instantly it wasn't possible. So what is NASA's excuse that they didn't know this ahead of time? I knew it couldn't be done back then. I always knew they'd waste a lot of time on the project and get nowhere.

 

[zyzygy]

NASA made plans to restore Mars back in 2000 and here is proof from their site
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/ames/news/releases/2000/00_68AR.html

So these evolutionists at NASA actually believed it was possible. I knew instantly it wasn't possible. So what is NASA's excuse that they didn't know this ahead of time? I knew it couldn't be done back then. I always knew they'd waste a lot of time on the project and get nowhere.

They changed their minds. So what?

 

[Ploughboy]

They changed their minds. So what?

They changed their minds because they finally realized, after all these years, that Mars is dead and cannot be revived back to life. This means no artificial nutrients from earth into Mars soil is gonna change anything. I knew this back in 2000 and also knew NASA were being delusional due to their belief in evolution. There are cluster bombs of problems they would have run into. To make matters even worse, you can give Mars liquid water and warmer temperatures and still nothing will change. But evolutionists have this belief that where there is water there is life. Seems logical on the surface. But beneath the fantasy there lies much deeper issues which NASA must know about but do not want to admit due to embarrassment. That would hurt their credibility as scientists and most severely place evolution theory as a model of science into serious question!

 

[zyzygy]

They changed their minds because they finally realized, after all these years, that Mars is dead and cannot be revived back to life. This means no artificial nutrients from earth into Mars soil is gonna change anything. I knew this back in 2000 and also knew NASA were being delusional due to their belief in evolution. There are cluster bombs of problems they would have run into. To make matters even worse, you can give Mars liquid water and warmer temperatures and still nothing will change. But evolutionists have this belief that where there is water there is life. Seems logical on the surface. But beneath the fantasy there lies much deeper issues which NASA must know about but do not want to admit due to embarrassment. That would hurt their credibility as scientists and most severely place evolution theory as a model of science into serious question!

Nope. Where there is water there may be life. Nobody has said that life is always found in water. You make things up all the time. Btw, what about the names of the owners of the Science Channel? You made up that bit about them all being atheists. Prove it. Real proof, not your delusions. How's your pet dinosaur?

 

[Ploughboy]

Nope. Where there is water there may be life. Nobody has said that life is always found in water. You make things up all the time. Btw, what about the names of the owners of the Science Channel? You made up that bit about them all being atheists. Prove it. Real proof, not your delusions. How's your pet dinosaur?

If the Science Channel was not run by evolutionists, then why isn't there any creationist programming on there? If you cannot use common sense to answer simple problems then that is your problem....not mine.

There is no water on Mars.
https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-confirms-evidence-that-liquid-water-flows-on-today-s-mars

oops, did I just link the wrong article and make myself out to be liar? That article from evolutionists at NASA says there is liquid water on Mars and I said there isn't. I must be lying!! Not! Its dry ice...NASA is lying!

 

[zyzygy]

If the Science Channel was not run by evolutionists, then why isn't there any creationist programming on there? If you cannot use common sense to answer simple problems then that is your problem....not mine.

There is no water on Mars.
https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-confirms-evidence-that-liquid-water-flows-on-today-s-mars

oops, did I just link the wrong article and make myself out to be liar? That article from evolutionists at NASA says there is liquid water on Mars and I said there isn't. I must be lying!! Not! Its dry ice...NASA is lying!

Prove it. Your wild fantasies are not proof.

 

[Ploughboy]

Prove it. Your wild fantasies are not proof.

Prove what? That water don't exist on Mars and that its dry ice, or prove that terraforming is impossible on Mars?

 

[zyzygy]

Prove what? That water don't exist on Mars and that its dry ice, or prove that terraforming is impossible on Mars?

No. Prove that the Science Channel is run by atheists. Your statements are not proof. Name the people running the channel and prove that they are atheists. I have asked this already but you are ignoring it and I know why.

 

[Ploughboy]

No. Prove that the Science Channel is run by atheists. Your statements are not proof. Name the people running the channel and prove that they are atheists.

Common sense is proof. If you don't have common sense then nobody can help you. I'm surprised you didn't ask me to back up any claim relevant to the OP. I can back everything I say with real science. NASA didn't know real science which is why I am exploiting their stupid faith in evolution which costs tax payers so much money. After all is spent, they ran into problems they cannot tell the public because its too damn embarrassing to admit. The entire idea was based on a faulty premise from the start which had nothing at all to do with real science.

 

[zyzygy]

Common sense is proof. If you don't have common sense then nobody can help you. I'm surprised you didn't ask me to back up any claim relevant to the OP. I can back everything I say with real science. NASA didn't know real science which is why I am exploiting their stupid faith in evolution which costs tax payers so much money. After all is spent, they ran into problems they cannot tell the public because its too damn embarrassing to admit. The entire idea was based on a faulty premise from the start which had nothing at all to do with real science.

You don't use common sense and anyway common sense is not proof. Name the people behind the Science Channel and prove that they are atheists. Your "common sense" opinion is not proof. You really have an evolution fixation. It seems to annoy you. The evidence for evolution upsets you. How do you explain fossils? How do you explain DNA? Give us some of this real science that you have kept hidden so far. The OP asked Is There Life On Mars? The answer is that we don't know.

 

[Ploughboy]

You don't use common sense and anyway common sense is not proof. Name the people behind the Science Channel and prove that they are atheists. Your "common sense" opinion is not proof. You really have an evolution fixation. It seems to annoy you. The evidence for evolution upsets you. How do you explain fossils? How do you explain DNA? Give us some of this real science that you have kept hidden so far. The OP asked Is There Life On Mars? The answer is that we don't know.

You would like to derail the OP with nonsense but I'm not going to take focus off of the real issue which is how evolution theory is the model of thought behind the terraforming Mars idea. This should not have even been a thought in the mind of any scientist. There is no way to provide nutrients to the soil on Mars. Why didn't NASA know this? Can you stay on topic or are you too afraid to face the real reason why Mars terraforming was abandoned?

 

[zyzygy]

You would like to derail the OP with nonsense but I'm not going to take focus off of the real issue which is how evolution theory is the model of thought behind the terraforming Mars idea. This should not have even been a thought in the mind of any scientist. There is no way to provide nutrients to the soil on Mars. Why didn't NASA know this? Can you stay on topic or are you too afraid to face the real reason why Mars terraforming was abandoned?

Irony meters explode. I don't care about terraforming. You are only using it in a failed attempt to connect it to your wrong view of evolution.

 

[Ploughboy]

Irony meters explode. I don't care about terraforming. You are only using it in a failed attempt to connect it to your wrong view of evolution.

I think the wrong view of evolution theory is merely having faith it can happen. NASA proved it can't happen.

From this article:
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/ames/news/releases/2000/00_68AR.html

A renowned cadre of researchers from diverse scientific disciplines will present the latest findings in terraforming Mars at a 2-day conference at NASA’s Ames Research Center. The conference, "The Physics and Biology of Making Mars Habitable," will focus on restoring Mars' environment so it can support life, including possibly human life.

Astrobiology is the study of the origin, evoution, distribution and destiny of life in the universe. Located in California’s Silicon Valley, Ames is NASA’s Center of Excellence for Astrobiology, and manages the NASA Astrobiology Institute.

Astrobiology is the study of evolution and this study is what influenced NASA to entertain fallacious thoughts about starting life on Mars by warming up the planet's surface where the...:lamo....ice would melt, water to flow, and cause what? Can you say it?

 

[zyzygy]

I think the wrong view of evolution theory is merely having faith it can happen. NASA proved it can't happen.

From this article:
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/ames/news/releases/2000/00_68AR.html





Astrobiology is the study of evolution and this study is what influenced NASA to entertain fallacious thoughts about starting life on Mars by warming up the planet's surface where the...:lamo....ice would melt, water to flow, and cause what? Can you say it?

Mars would get wet. NASA has not disproved evolution. That is a nonsensical statement. NASA's activities have no effect on the evidence for evolution.

 

[zyzygy]

How have NASA's activities affected the fossil record and the evidence for evolution?

 

[Ploughboy]

Mars would get wet. NASA has not disproved evolution. That is a nonsensical statement. NASA's activities have no effect on the evidence for evolution.

How about how NASA scientists are themselves evolutionists that don't know enough about science to have enough common sense to see that such thinking isn't worth the time and energy. Yet they actually believed and even still believe its possible to terraform Mars.