LOL...No just the WTC there was no plane at the pentagon ask HD he knows sooo sooo much about planes :lamo
LOL...
I suppose the engine parts, landing gear, etc. were all planted...
What knocked down the light poles?
What I find truly hilarious is that most of these 9/11 truther nutjobs are flaming Bush haters. All you ever heard from them was how big an idiot Bush was, how stupid Bush was, etc, etc, etc. and yet they turn around and claim that he was somehow brilliant enough to pull off one of the biggest, most complex, covert operations that the world has ever seen without anyone finding out he was behind it all.
Are you familiar with the practice of compartmentalization within the federal government?
Are you familiar with training exercises and the mental outlooks they (accidentally) cause?
What I find truly hilarious is that most of these 9/11 truther nutjobs are flaming Bush haters. All you ever heard from them was how big an idiot Bush was, how stupid Bush was, etc, etc, etc. and yet they turn around and claim that he was somehow brilliant enough to pull off one of the biggest, most complex, covert operations that the world has ever seen without anyone finding out he was behind it all.
my brother in law is like that he is schizophrenic on Bush. Bush is a moron/Bush is an evil genius. He will actually make both claims in the same sentence sometimes :lamo
You should have gleaned by now I'm not going to try hard at all. I'm not going to waste countless hours looking stuff up to support what is real. I'll point out a few things here and there, and laugh my derriere off as you guys come up with so called proof.
Are you suggesting these people are all stupid and didn't realize what they participated in, or none of the ones who put the pieces together spoke out?
After all these years... no one with actual information spoke out?
Unbelievable...
George W. Bush is not dumb. Although he was an average student, he has a B.A. from Yale and a Masters degree from Harvard. He was also capable of being trained as a reserve fighter pilot.
The dumb bunny stuff is because he acts copokish at times and it is an overplayed comment without much thought given to it.
You have to admit he cannot be both an evil genius and a total moron at the same time.
for me, it all comes down to the sheer number of people that would have to be involved in the cover-up if 911 was an "inside job". same with the moon landing hoax nutters. hundreds, if not thousands, of people would have to be involved and every one of them would have to keep the secret.
Yes. So?
OK, I have to hear this. I'm sure truthers debunk this somehow, but this one, I haven't heard yet.
I'm ready.
And he makes jokes out of people making fun of him. I haven't been active here very long, but to let you all know, I like the man. I only agree with maybe 50% of his positions, but that is better than all presidents since Reagan. I can understand his sense of humor. I forget the word he used now, but it was one of the comedy station years back that made up a word mocking him. So afterwards, he used that same word in a statement, or address to the nation, or something. I have to give him credit for that. Because of my job, I have had an individual make fun of me as a "parts changer." just to spite that a-hole, I since started calling myself a parts changer. I am proud of what I do, and so few people are capable of doing what I do.George W. Bush is not dumb. Although he was an average student, he has a B.A. from Yale and a Masters degree from Harvard. He was also capable of being trained as a reserve fighter pilot.
The dumb bunny stuff is because he acts copokish at times and it is an overplayed comment without much thought given to it.
Why do I need to support the obvious?But you don't point out anything objective that supports your position.
OK, but also...For starters let's see the same test with a Boeing and not a fighter jet which is built much more robust, otherwise you're comparing apples and oranges. More later when I get time.
Maybe because I like to see just how far in the deep end you guy are...But you don't point out anything objective that supports your position.
Your anti-Semitic crap is was and always will be anti-Semitic crap.
Another one who's in denial.
It is a fact of history that Israel has conducted terrorist attacks against its American and British benefactors, as well as other Jews. Does this in itself prove that that Israel's military/intelligence apparatus was somehow involved in these attacks? No of course not. But it does prove propensity.
Do you agree or disagree with that statement?
Another one who's in denial.
It is a fact of history that Israel has conducted terrorist attacks against its American and British benefactors, as well as other Jews. Does this in itself prove that that Israel's military/intelligence apparatus was somehow involved in these attacks? No of course not. But it does prove propensity.
Do you agree or disagree with that statement?
Are you aware of how the government leaks like a sieve? That they can barely keep a secret to save their lives, without somebody leaking it?
Look at Watergate. A nothing burglary, nobody died, and the #3 man in the FBI went to the press.
Iran-Contra, where things happened front-page almost as soon as they happened.
Our history of keeping secrets is pretty piss-poor. And those inside always end up becoming public, with lots of evidence to boot.
Why would this be any different?
Why do I need to support the obvious?
OK, but also...
Considering ground instead of reinforced concrete, look up the physics of how a "deadblow hammer" works also.
How about considering the structural differences between the wall of a nuclear reactor and the walls of the Pentagon, which according to the official story, was penetrated through several sections, leaving a cute little 'exit hole'?
Also, how about considering the structural differences between a supersonic fighter jet and a commercial passenger jet, subsonic?
Also how about considering the different structure and characteristics of Pennsylvania coal country soil to, for example, the Everglades, or to sandy soil?
How about considering the structural differences between the wall of a nuclear reactor and the walls of the Pentagon, which according to the official story, was penetrated through several sections, leaving a cute little 'exit hole'?
Also, how about considering the structural differences between a supersonic fighter jet and a commercial passenger jet, subsonic?
Also how about considering the different structure and characteristics of Pennsylvania coal country soil to, for example, the Everglades, or to sandy soil?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?