- Joined
- Dec 29, 2015
- Messages
- 45,404
- Reaction score
- 11,746
- Location
- Olympia Wa
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Like I told Gath, in many (though certainly not all) instances you look to the policies and procedures and then look to see how they impact various demographics.
Many of the things that were discussed by the video are related to the education systems' current balance between academics and socialization, classroom management, and discipline. Those changes then have consequences on groups differently. Further, social biases can then make those changes either even more beneficial or even more harmful than otherwise likely.
Yes, our school system has a habit of trying to shove boys onto Ritalin. But have you noticed there's an awful lot of girls on psychiatric downers rather than uppers? Have you taken a look at the statistics on that lately? They're chilling. There's so many of them that the stats between boys and girls on some sort of psych drug wind up being nearly even.
Yes, our school system has a habit of trying to shove boys onto Ritalin. But have you noticed there's an awful lot of girls on psychiatric downers rather than uppers? Have you taken a look at the statistics on that lately? They're chilling. There's so many of them that the stats between boys and girls on some sort of psych drug wind up being nearly even.
Part of me, the impulsive part, agrees and wants to harp on this parent.
However, the liberal in me demands I pause and think and reflect a bit more.
I don't like kids. I don't like how they're raised to behave, grabbing and breaking stuff in stores, treating the power carts for disabled people like go-carts with their parents encouraging them on and laughing while some disabled lady really needing it is having to wait for one to become available. I don't like the "gimme gimme gimme" greed and competitiveness drilled into the kids.
But of course I have to realize, it isn't their fault. Its not entirely the parents' fault either. I definitely don't believe in the conservative "a woman's place is in the home," but I do agree if employers are paying people so little that both parents have to work and often at least one of the parent has to work more than one job, that's a lot of time with no one to be a home to be a parent to the kids. The amount of hours parents have to work just to pay the bills keeps going up and up and up, as companies keep executive pay ten times ahead of inflation while worker pay one-third inflation, so their checks cover less and less year after year. Worker productivity ramps up endlessly, so labor cost per item goes down, but instead of turning that into savings for customers, businesses actually keep raising prices and pocketting the skyrocketing profit margins on items instead, just for their executives and stockholders.
At the same time, gas taxes have frozen in absolute dollars (which means losing value due to inflation) as the cost of road maintenance and construction have skyrocketted, and -- in terms of being fiscally capable of maintaining roads and expanding to match ever-growing traffic demands -- worse, improved fuel economy means those flat per-gallon fuel tax rates actually give less per-mile-travelled revenue to cover the increased per-mile-wear-and-tear maintenance and capacity expansion ... ultimately resulting in roads that are over-capacity and undermaintained, so if longer hours at actual work aren't bad enough, parents have to waste more time stuck in traffic going to and from work to boot.
Of course this factors in to the quality of parenting that parents can accomplish. Is it the only factor? No. Do I hold parents faultless? No. But we have societal factors that are an increasing problem, too. I think if we manage to rein in on despicable employer practices, letting parents pay the bills while not working too many hours, there'll be fewer instances of bad parenting (and again I won't say it'll fix everything).
IS there a war on boys?
I'm dealing with this with my 5 year old son right now. He has trouble sitting still all day in class, and as a result, loses focus and gets on "bad" colors for the day.
Yes... although the cynic in me wonders if this is fudged a bit by curving the tests.
Do you want to take a wild guess who "the strapped ass" policy disproportionally affected?
It furthermore, it's not just affecting boys. It's affecting them in a particular way.
Also, the "left teacher" rant is absolute nonsense. Males still have an achievement gap even in boys-only schools with male teachers, and in university where male teachers are more common than female.
Expelling children willy-nilly over the slightest offense, meanwhile, is beyond counter-productive. It not only impedes their schooling, but it creates a bureaucratic paper trail which basically marks them as being a "bad egg" from then on forward. That affects both how they are treated by those in power over them, and how they respond to the environment.
Part of me, the impulsive part, agrees and wants to harp on this parent.
However, the liberal in me demands I pause and think and reflect a bit more.
I don't like kids. I don't like how they're raised to behave, grabbing and breaking stuff in stores, treating the power carts for disabled people like go-carts with their parents encouraging them on and laughing while some disabled lady really needing it is having to wait for one to become available. I don't like the "gimme gimme gimme" greed and competitiveness drilled into the kids.
But of course I have to realize, it isn't their fault. Its not entirely the parents' fault either. I definitely don't believe in the conservative "a woman's place is in the home," but I do agree if employers are paying people so little that both parents have to work and often at least one of the parent has to work more than one job, that's a lot of time with no one to be a home to be a parent to the kids. The amount of hours parents have to work just to pay the bills keeps going up and up and up, as companies keep executive pay ten times ahead of inflation while worker pay one-third inflation, so their checks cover less and less year after year. Worker productivity ramps up endlessly, so labor cost per item goes down, but instead of turning that into savings for customers, businesses actually keep raising prices and pocketting the skyrocketing profit margins on items instead, just for their executives and stockholders.
At the same time, gas taxes have frozen in absolute dollars (which means losing value due to inflation) as the cost of road maintenance and construction have skyrocketted, and -- in terms of being fiscally capable of maintaining roads and expanding to match ever-growing traffic demands -- worse, improved fuel economy means those flat per-gallon fuel tax rates actually give less per-mile-travelled revenue to cover the increased per-mile-wear-and-tear maintenance and capacity expansion ... ultimately resulting in roads that are over-capacity and undermaintained, so if longer hours at actual work aren't bad enough, parents have to waste more time stuck in traffic going to and from work to boot.
Of course this factors in to the quality of parenting that parents can accomplish. Is it the only factor? No. Do I hold parents faultless? No. But we have societal factors that are an increasing problem, too. I think if we manage to rein in on despicable employer practices, letting parents pay the bills while not working too many hours, there'll be fewer instances of bad parenting (and again I won't say it'll fix everything).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?