I've told you before. You have a computer. If you want disagreement with any of your postulates, the online physics department of any major univerity will suffice as will Physical Review-D, The Astrophysical Journal, Nature, SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System, SDSS, SNAP, etc. There are also innumerable academic or generalized books available for your perusal at any public or university library. Have at it.
Even if to imagine that zealous priests of cosmology elbowed and cheated out physics from all major universities and started issuing degrees to bimbos, there should be some places where physics is still in power and bimbos are used as bimbos.
The grim priests can burn
1. Lord Kelvin I quoted and referred to,
2. Abbe G. Lemaitre I refered to and
3. quoted,
4. Einstein and Maxwell I referred to,
5. Newton I do always refer to, -
but,
as none of the above would give 2 cents to a bimbo attempting to fly with velocities exceeding the speed of light,
I do not give 2 cents to any hypothetical disagreement you are sending me to investigate, like you send the audience to investigate the hypothetical dark energy. I live in the material world.
The call was: you have it, - bring it on.
You have brought what you could and you have not moved even a hair away from the simple algorithm I wrote for you and conquer. Like a winded doll you keep on sliding up and down on the same rod.
The fundamental laws and rules of physics cannot be overrun by charlatans and bimbos.
I’ve told you before I do not declare my education, I apply it.
Priests of cosmology and their bimbos speak to audience from above, they use fuzzy language to make heads to blow and hearts to beat, they call the audience to investigate and invest in dark energy. They don’t take any questions from the audience; instead they point their fingers to sacred skies of sacred libraries of Cosmological theology and to some higher wisdom empowering them.
Thank you, sweetie, for proving my point.
) There are plenty of websites supporting this.
