JamesRichards said:Try to ignore millsy, he's a militant liberal (an, amusing oxymoron), if he came home one day to find his male relatives murdered and criminals gang-raping his female relatives of all ages, before paralyzing him in an assault, anally-raping him, stealing his car and his beer, and finishing off by running down a dozen school children then killing eight police in a shootout, he would still oppose giving them the death penalty. What'cha say millsy?
JamesRichards said:You mind if I post this again?
I just really wanna hear you say the magic words.:smile:
OH YEAH! Thar he blows!:mrgreen: That's what the crowd wanted to see. Thanks.millsy said:If somebody did something to harm my family would I want to see them put to death? Absolutely not, I would want to do it myself
I understand this logic and it is very sensible. Of course I think that their input is precisely what the justice system needs (Certainly the British system) but i'm happy to leave this one here.millsy said:This is why I don't believe that fathers of murdered baby daughters should be the ones making decisions about our justice system
and the ones that are alter found to be not guilty?Because they will be declared innocent or guilty for their crimes. If guilty, they get shot. Simple as that. If innocent, they are sent free. Simple as that
Willoughby said:and the ones that are alter found to be not guilty?
-Demosthenes- said:Why do those who say that death penalty is good because they don't have to live through prison not support euthanasia?
Ridiculous really isn't it? Personally, I can see a valid reasoning to both.-Demosthenes- said:Why do those who say that death penalty is good because they don't have to live through prison not support euthinasia?
Korimyr the Rat said:Which is more cruel-- hunting or factory farming?
I think they're comparable.
MikeRocks said:I know that if I was given a choice bettween life in prison or the death sentence, I would much rather be killed.
So to answer the question which started this, life in prison is much more cruel in my opinion.
Loxd4 said:What the hell are you thinking....by think life in prison is cruel punishment
millsy said:Heck, why even bother with a trial? It's not like the police are going to arrest an innocent person. In fact we can save a lot of money by doing away with judges and courts all together. Just let the police decide what punishment the guilty person (cause if they weren't guilty the police wouldn't arrest them) should get, and then give it to them right there.
MCS117 said:So the fair trail would be thrown out the windows when we start killing murderers? Why do we have to give trails? Because they will be declared innocent or guilty for their crimes. If guilty, they get shot. Simple as that. If innocent, they are sent free. Simple as that.
imprtnrd said:If someone is guilty by evidence----dna or whatever, and they get the death penalty it is not unhumane! After all,they didn't care about that when they commited it. Killing someone, etc. Geesh!
Brevity is the soul of wit -- Polonius to Laertes, Hamlet, Act II Scene ii
Jerm said:Please voice your opinoins. I personally think that life in prison is harsher if less economically friendly. I also think that the GOV is too soft in dealing out the death penalty. Murder should more often lead to the death penalty, in my opinion, but thats another story.
...Brevity said:Brevity is the soul of wit -- Polonius to Laertes, Hamlet, Act II Scene ii
Sarafluff said:The worst that could happen to a man is to be locked inside a little cell, with no light and no one to talk to. If you kill the man who committed the crime you let him get away with it. He wins in someway. And that's not fair to the victim.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?