Obama ran for a second term largely on the story that Alquiada had been decimated on his watch. Then when terrorist linked to Alquiada attacked a US embassy and killed the Ambassador along with several other Americans Obama lied to the voters and said it was a spontaneous demonstration that got out of hand and was caused by a you tube video. Now that it has come out that he flat out lied and was told by the CIA it was indeed terrorism and now that it has come out that he told the CIA to delete all references to terrorism it seems he was elected for a second term largely based on a lie. It could be argued that if the voters knew from the beginning that terrorist did this it very well could have swung the election. Does this make him a president elected under false pretenses and therefor illegitimate? They took away Lance Armstrong's medals for breaking the rules and lying about it and erased all his records calling them illegitimate so what's the difference here?
Obama ran for a second term largely on the story that Alquiada had been decimated on his watch. Then when terrorist linked to Alquiada attacked a US embassy and killed the Ambassador along with several other Americans Obama lied to the voters and said it was a spontaneous demonstration that got out of hand and was caused by a you tube video. Now that it has come out that he flat out lied and was told by the CIA it was indeed terrorism and now that it has come out that he told the CIA to delete all references to terrorism it seems he was elected for a second term largely based on a lie. It could be argued that if the voters knew from the beginning that terrorist did this it very well could have swung the election. Does this make him a president elected under false pretenses and therefor illegitimate? They took away Lance Armstrong's medals for breaking the rules and lying about it and erased all his records calling them illegitimate so what's the difference here?
You have made an accusation.
Now you need to either provide us with some proof or retract your egregious lie.
"No man has a good enough memory to be a successful liar." ~ Abraham Lincoln
Obama won
get over it
this election was the GOP's for the taking. and the republicans snatched defeat from the jaws of victory by running a milk toast ticket
and this is just the start
in 2016 a woman will win the presidential election
and Elizabeth Warren will kick some substantial republican ass over two terms
you may want to emigrate somewhere whiter and avoid having to endure such diversity
Anyone who calls Bush "dumb" needs to have copies and pictures of at least two Ivy League degrees with his or her name on them.
After all, he has them. No other POTUS does. Not Carter (lol), not Slick Willie, not any of them. None.
Anyone who calls Bush "dumb" needs to have copies and pictures of at least two Ivy League degrees with his or her name on them.
After all, he has them. No other POTUS does. Not Carter (lol), not Slick Willie, not any of them. None.
This is a perfect example of what is not a good argument to make in favor of ivy leagues.
Well I wouldn't trade my U of M business degree for any Ivy League biz degree (except Wharton at UPenn), but they're not scrubs schools by any stretch.
That's fine. I'm just saying that if I have an unimpressive intellect, I'm not doing my alma mater any favors by putting them on my cv.
"Unimpressive intellect" is a stretch though. You better have some serious credentials before you go calling Bush dumb. Otherwise, it comes off as petty jealousy.
Bush was an arrogant, unimaginative and remarkably uncurious man. But he wasn't dumb, and did in fact have an extremely high social intelligence. Happy?
Bush was an arrogant, unimaginative and remarkably uncurious man. But he wasn't dumb, and did in fact have an extremely high social intelligence. Happy?
High "social intelligence"?
Progressives...
Yes, based on this premise. Personally, I am waiting for impeachment proceedings.Obama ran for a second term largely on the story that Alquiada had been decimated on his watch. Then when terrorist linked to Alquiada attacked a US embassy and killed the Ambassador along with several other Americans Obama lied to the voters and said it was a spontaneous demonstration that got out of hand and was caused by a you tube video. Now that it has come out that he flat out lied and was told by the CIA it was indeed terrorism and now that it has come out that he told the CIA to delete all references to terrorism it seems he was elected for a second term largely based on a lie. It could be argued that if the voters knew from the beginning that terrorist did this it very well could have swung the election. Does this make him a president elected under false pretenses and therefor illegitimate? They took away Lance Armstrong's medals for breaking the rules and lying about it and erased all his records calling them illegitimate so what's the difference here?
Obama ran for a second term largely on the story that Alquiada had been decimated on his watch. Then when terrorist linked to Alquiada attacked a US embassy and killed the Ambassador along with several other Americans Obama lied to the voters and said it was a spontaneous demonstration that got out of hand and was caused by a you tube video. Now that it has come out that he flat out lied and was told by the CIA it was indeed terrorism and now that it has come out that he told the CIA to delete all references to terrorism it seems he was elected for a second term largely based on a lie. It could be argued that if the voters knew from the beginning that terrorist did this it very well could have swung the election. Does this make him a president elected under false pretenses and therefor illegitimate? They took away Lance Armstrong's medals for breaking the rules and lying about it and erased all his records calling them illegitimate so what's the difference here?
Clinton had to abandon Communism to get a second term. Thank God for Gingrich and Dole.Clinton was a Rhodes scholar and went to Oxford and Yale. I'll take that over 2 Ivy League degrees any day.
Clinton had to abandon Communism to get a second term. Thank God for Gingrich and Dole.
Except for Obama of course.Anyone who calls Bush "dumb" needs to have copies and pictures of at least two Ivy League degrees with his or her name on them.
After all, he has them. No other POTUS does. Not Carter (lol), not Slick Willie, not any of them. None.
Another convert to true enlightenment. Welcome home, brother!Yeah, Clinton was an avowed communist alright. Thank goodness Gingrich and Dole thwarted the Revolution.
Another convert to true enlightenment. Welcome home, brother!
Except for Obama of course.
I didn't adjust that claim to represent the current POTUS. After 43 presidents, it was true.
I also wouldn't call Obama dumb in the slightest. Malicious? Sure. Incompetent? Absolutely. However, it's a brave man to actually stoop to the description of "dumb". Same goes with Bush.
It's more or less impossible not to be considered incompetent or malicious when half the country is committed to perceiving every single word that proceeds from your mouth as both foolish and an attack on them personally based on party affiliation alone.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?