Yes, but I was saying that who ever was elected in 2008 was going to be a one term president.
I agree. I believe that Obama has his sights set on a global position beyond the USA. Quite frankly, I find him almost bored with being President of the USA. His remark about preferring to be a good one-term president was telling beyond the usual smack against GWB.
According go the Democrats, when you win an election, the other side has to ride in the back.Obama is not a lame duck. The Republicans in Congress are a long, long way away from being able to over-ride him, and they're a long, long way from working with the Democrats.
Do you have the capacity to comment seriously on anything, or are partisan one-liners all you've got?
The Republicans did not decisively win the election. They got a majority in one house, and firmed up their minority in the Senate. Nothing's going to get done on either side unless there's some cooperation.
After his term as president of Amerika, he'd be the ideal Secretary-General of the UN. He'd feel right at home leading that anti-American body.
.
Oh my!
Has Pelosi joined Debate Politics? "did not decisively win the election"... ROTFLOL... Upstate NY importing BC Bud?
Earth to Nancy... ahhhhhhhh... the second largest midterm swing in history???..."did not decisively win the election"??? ROTFLOL...
de·ci·sive Adjective /diˈsīsiv/
1. Settling an issue; producing a definite result2. (of a person) Having or showing the ability to make decisions quickly and effectively
- the Supreme Court voided the statute by a decisive 7–2 vote
- decisive evidence
Ahhhhhh.... Not the cunning linguist you think you are... not by a mile.I guess you're in need of some remedial English. Observe:
ROTFLOL... may I suggest Hooked on Memory Improvement?
Or perhaps the back-link button to review what YOU wrote.
Perhaps a remedial English course from the school at the end of this thread?
Remember this? You wrote it:
Republicans won the election both decisively and historically.The Republicans did not decisively win the election.
You did use the word election... did you not?
de·ci·sive
/dɪˈsaɪsɪv/ Show Spelled[dih-sahy-siv] Show IPA
–adjective
1.
having the power or quality of deciding; putting an end to controversy; crucial or most important: Your argument was the decisive one.
2.
characterized by or displaying no or little hesitation; resolute; determined: The general was known for his decisive manner.
3.
indisputable; definite: a decisive defeat. (or victory)
4.
unsurpassable; commanding: a decisive lead in the voting.
The election... your words... was a decisive victory for the Right.
The election...
That decisive victory has major implications. If it were a minor victory it wouldn't, but being decisive across the country, in state houses, governorships as well as Federally... it was one of the most decisive victories in the history of the country.
Insert Quarter and try again.
.
Ahhhhhh.... Not the cunning linguist you think you are... not by a mile.
ROTFLOL... may I suggest Hooked on Memory Improvement?
Or perhaps the back-link button to review what YOU wrote.
Perhaps a remedial English course from the school at the end of this thread?
Remember this? You wrote it:
Republicans won the election both decisively and historically.
I fear that you are correct...Lame Duck? No, not yet anyway. He's pretty close though. He needs to turn things around like Clinton was able to if he has a chance. My money's not on that happening though. He doesn't have the leadership attributes that Clinton had in terms of being able to talk to the people.
The Democrats have no good and effective counter to Beck and Limbaugh...and Fox...
How can you call it a decisive win when nobody controls the government?
1. Your opening sentence claimed the election was not decisive.
The election: D E C I S I V E... and H I S T O R I C.
It wasn't, for the reasons I've clearly stated.
You: Completely ignoring my rather lengthy post where I laid out just how wrong you were, responding only to the one-liner that I posted in response to someone else. :lol:
Repeating yourself over and over and over with no substance to back up your repetition may qualify as a worthy argument in your mind, but to me all it means is that you've got precicely Jack and ****.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?