Is Loretta Lynch incompetent or is she just another political crook and liar?
If we are to believe that Lynch inadvertently met up with Bill Clinton on an airport tarmac and only discussed Clinton’s golf game and their grandchildren in the face of the FBI’s & Justice Department’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s insecure e-mails and the Clinton’s Foundation operations, then shouldn’t we also believe that Loretta Lynch is either an incompetent for exposing herself to the illegal impropriety or a liar?
Is Loretta Lynch incompetent or is she just another political crook and liar?
If we are to believe that Lynch inadvertently met up with Bill Clinton on an airport tarmac and only discussed Clinton’s golf game and their grandchildren in the face of the FBI’s & Justice Department’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s insecure e-mails and the Clinton’s Foundation operations, then shouldn’t we also believe that Loretta Lynch is either an incompetent for exposing herself to the illegal impropriety or a liar?
Is Loretta Lynch incompetent or is she just another political crook and liar?
If we are to believe that Lynch inadvertently met up with Bill Clinton on an airport tarmac and only discussed Clinton’s golf game and their grandchildren in the face of the FBI’s & Justice Department’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s insecure e-mails and the Clinton’s Foundation operations, then shouldn’t we also believe that Loretta Lynch is either an incompetent for exposing herself to the illegal impropriety or a liar?
Is Loretta Lynch incompetent or is she just another political crook and liar?
If we are to believe that Lynch inadvertently met up with Bill Clinton on an airport tarmac and only discussed Clinton’s golf game and their grandchildren in the face of the FBI’s & Justice Department’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s insecure e-mails and the Clinton’s Foundation operations, then shouldn’t we also believe that Loretta Lynch is either an incompetent for exposing herself to the illegal impropriety or a liar?
You could throw in the word racist also.
She is neither.
Oh, the agony of the right!
While some of the claims made against her might be open to debate there is no doubt that she is a racist.
Gee! Why did I never believe you would think so?
I'm no more to the right than you are. I don't belong to or vote for political parties. I view the right and left as BIG government traitors to the nation.
Is Loretta Lynch incompetent or is she just another political crook and liar?
If we are to believe that Lynch inadvertently met up with Bill Clinton on an airport tarmac and only discussed Clinton’s golf game and their grandchildren in the face of the FBI’s & Justice Department’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s insecure e-mails and the Clinton’s Foundation operations, then shouldn’t we also believe that Loretta Lynch is either an incompetent for exposing herself to the illegal impropriety or a liar?
Who wants to be the AG that brings down the corrupt and criminal house of Clinton?
Who wants to be the AG that brings down the coronated presidential candidate of the DNC establishment?
Who wants to be the AG that directly changes the outcome of a presidential election?
Me where do I sign up?
If the AG is going to go with the FBI recommendations, I'd say the odds have likely greatly increased of Hilary being indicted and likely Biden chosen as replacement by the party. My guess a Biden/Warren ticket.
Yeah, sure.
No, I don't think that Lynch is incompetent. She's in a very tough position here. Apparently the FBI does have the criminal goods on Hillary and the Clinton foundation, Hill and Bill and Obama just want it to 'go away', but Comey apparently isn't going to let it happen. The typical rock and a hard place.
She can't really do anything about it but escape with as much of her integrity (such as it remains) in tact. Recusing herself allows her this escape, but also dings her integrity and honestly in a serious manner, as it's all but obvious what she's doing, and why.
Who wants to be the AG that brings down the corrupt and criminal house of Clinton?
Who wants to be the AG that brings down the coronated presidential candidate of the DNC establishment?
Who wants to be the AG that directly changes the outcome of a presidential election?
If the AG isn't capable of faithfully enforcing the law, a fundamental tenet of her office and role, isn't assigning and authorizing a special prosecutor the next order of business?
If the AG is going to go with the FBI recommendations, I'd say the odds have likely greatly increased of Hilary being indicted and likely Biden chosen as replacement by the party. My guess a Biden/Warren ticket.
You're welcome to prove differently.
I'm no more to the right than you are.
"Prove" is one of those words tossed about carelessly in these kinds of discussions, Hammer.
Your claim...the one I took exception to, was:
I'll leave the veracity of that statement up to you.
Here is where I am:
On a continuum with Very conservative at 0 and Very liberal at 10...I would be found at position "P."
In other words, I am not even on that continuum; I am outside that box.
BUT...as for liberal agenda items...I am very far to the left of people like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, for example.
VERY FAR.
I doubt seriously that any of them would champion the progressive agenda I advocate.
So...if you indeed are that far to the left...and no further to the right...then you are correct and I am wrong. You are, in fact, no more to the right than I am.
But, if you would be uncomfortable being where I am...if you are to the right of that...then you are wrong.
So...I cannot "prove" that I am not as far right as you...
...but I am willing to take your word on the issue after having read what I wrote here.
So...what say you?
I hope, for the sake of argument, you are right. It would be horrific to think a government has gotten so bold as to have their own internet servers and to meet with leads in an investigation while insisting they were in route to playing golf. Look, i know your heart is tied to a certain position but imagine for one second the reverse was true. Would you be so certain? This isn't about political parties, this is about something no good person wants to see. Not a conspiracy because a conspiracy wouldn't be so obvious. So for my own sake, I hope you are sure and not just stubborn.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?