That's circular logic. A simple solution would be to make citizenship easier or do away with those laws alltogether. Would you still be opposed to such an idea?
Alright, I'll bite, but you haven't demonstrated that to be a bad thing. Using that logic this nation was founded by invaders. Why shouldn't we encourage "invasion" in that case?
That's not very convincing, because there is no reason why someone would prefer to hire an illegal immigrant who doesn't speak English over an American -- unless they are willing to do the same amount of work for a lower wage -- in which case we are talking about a free market with labor competition. I personally support free markets, so I would not be opposed to that at all.
I think the real problem is this sense of entitlement Americans seem to have for everything. Illegals do jobs that Americans don't want to do for similar wages, plain and simple. They'd rather collect unemployment benefits for years on end or some other government handout. Again I see the real problem being the social programs, not immigration.
There is a hint of racism there whether you're willing to acknowledge it or not. As Americans we feel we are "above" illegals, their lifestyles, jobs, wages, etc. I don't expect anyone to ever admit to it, but I will, I think everyone is guilty of it.
That's ironic, you're the one who seems to be ignorant of economic realities. Removing illegals does not solve the problem, instead we get what is known as "outsourcing." You seem to forget that there is no such thing as a free lunch. Higher wages are always reflected in higher prices -- period. They increase the cost of doing business, which reduces profits and makes such models less competitive. If you want an example of this look at non-unionized Honda wages vs General Motors.
Wages can't properly be dictated by a government, but rather the free market. I suppose if machines were doing all the work you'd be telling us to get rid of the machines? Technology has claimed exponentially more jobs than illegal immigration, it's just much harder to rally around an "anti-technology" platform and not look like a complete fool.