- Joined
- Mar 5, 2008
- Messages
- 113,023
- Reaction score
- 60,613
- Location
- Sarasota Fla
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
You just want to believe homosexuality to be unnatural, and twist the definition to fit your view.
To be fair, he's not really "twisting" it - he's just making one up and disregarding the dictionary.
Not everything that humans do is natural. Like homosexual sex, dictionary definitions of natural dont change that. Thanks for playing.
Do you know what the word "exceptional" means? Being the dominant species out of millions is pretty much the definition of exceptional.
Not everything that humans do is natural. Like homosexual sex, dictionary definitions of natural dont change that. Thanks for playing.
It's not the only definition. We are the dominant species due to our exceptionalism...not the other way around.
For the thousandth time...according to whom? Do you possess some credential that nobody's aware of in order to make that claim?
You are sounding as though it's FACT...and not opinion "once again".
Which is it?
And your definition is?
Who care? Do you deny that humans are capable of unnatural acts?
If not from the dictionary, where, pray tell, should we get our definitions?Not everything that humans do is natural. Like homosexual sex, dictionary definitions of natural dont change that. Thanks for playing.
Who care? Do you deny that humans are capable of unnatural acts?
Who care? Do you deny that humans are capable of unnatural acts?
Actually works both ways. Being the dominant species does make us exceptional.
You making up you own definition of "unnatural" as it relates to homosexuality. If the shoes doesn't fit, surgically alter the size of the foot...right?
No, how we are communicating is unnatural.
Then you prove my point...because humans do it does not make it natural.
Nor does it make it unnatural. So, what we need is your definition of natural. If you are going to call homosexual sex unnatural, you need to give a reference for us to work with or we have no way to hold a conversation beyond "yes it is" "no it isn't".
That's not my purpose at the moment. Right now im just showing the holes in your appeal to nature.
Dear mac,
Where are we supposed to get our definitions of natural if not in the dictionary?
Love,
theplaydrive
I am not appealing to nature. Whether gay sex is natural or not has no bearing on my arguments about SSM. I am just laughing at your desperate attempts at claiming something that by any accepted definition of natural is, actually is not. Since you are putting all that effort into claiming it is not natural, you should at least try and support that claim. I was able to casually and without effort prove that it is in fact natural by the accepted definition of natural.
Can you fast?
This has what to do with you actually mentioning your definition of natural? Why are you so afraid of actually giving a definition?
Can you choose not to eat?
This has what to do with you actually mentioning your definition of natural? Why are you so afraid of actually giving a definition?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?