• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is Homosexuality sinful and/or unnatural?

Is homosexuality wrong and/or unnatural?


  • Total voters
    128
Human beings are a part of nature. Therefore, all human sex occurs in nature. It's natural according to the definition RamFel provided.

So? Animals having sex has no bearing on human homosexuality.
 
So? Animals having sex has no bearing on human homosexuality.
No one is talking about (other) animals. We're talking about humans. Re-read what I said. Human beings occur in nature. This means that HUMAN homosexual sex is natural according to the definition provided.
 
No one is talking about (other) animals. We're talking about humans. Re-read what I said. Human beings occur in nature. This means that HUMAN homosexual sex is natural according to the definition provided.

So, of course humans can only perform natural acts by your reasoning?
 


Well I looked at your source and saw you dishonestly left out a link so the real surveys would be left out that say 67% to 80% practice anal sex. This from your own source at wiki.

So I assume you want to take back your line of bull****? :lamo
 
So, of course humans can only perform natural acts by your reasoning?
It's not by my reasoning - it's by the definition of natural. Let's try to stick to that.
 
It's not by my reasoning - it's by the definition of natural. Let's try to stick to that.

Let's not. Humans are exceptional and capable of unnatural acts...like homosexual intercourse.
 
Let's not. Humans are exceptional and capable of unnatural acts...like homosexual intercourse.
You just admitted that you base your decisions on what you want to be true instead of actual definitions of what things are.
 
Let's not. Humans are exceptional and capable of unnatural acts...like homosexual intercourse.

Humans engaged in homosexual acts before we became the dominant species on the planet.
 
You just admitted that you base your decisions on what you want to be true instead of actual definitions of what things are.

No I did not. Stop putting words in my mouth.
 
No I did not. Stop putting words in my mouth.
Actually, that's exactly what you did.

It's not by my reasoning - it's by the definition of natural. Let's try to stick to that.
Let's not. Humans are exceptional and capable of unnatural acts...like homosexual intercourse.

Right. Let's not stick to the actual definition of natural and make stuff up instead. I'm not interested. You've seen the definition of natural and homosexual sex is natural according to it.
 
Actually, that's exactly what you did.

I'm not in the least bit interested in whatever dictionary version you are using. Humans are capable of unnatural acts, like homosexual intercourse.
 
I'm not in the least bit interested in whatever dictionary version you are using. Humans are capable of unnatural acts, like homosexual intercourse.
Exactly. When most people ask "is X natural?", they go to a dictionary to find out what the definition of natural is and find out if X meets the definintion. You just make something up. That makes zero sense.

Why is there so much hate on dictionaries in this thread? At least two people now have said that dictionaries aren't reliable sources for definitions. :shrug:
 
Being the dominant species =/= exceptional.

You just want to believe homosexuality to be unnatural, and twist the definition to fit your view.
 
You just want to believe homosexuality to be unnatural, and twist the definition to fit your view.
To be fair, he's not really "twisting" it - he's just making one up and disregarding the dictionary.
 
Being the dominant species =/= exceptional.

Do you know what the word "exceptional" means? Being the dominant species out of millions is pretty much the definition of exceptional.
 
I'm not in the least bit interested in whatever dictionary version you are using. Humans are capable of unnatural acts, like homosexual intercourse.

For the thousandth time...according to whom? Do you possess some credential that nobody's aware of in order to make that claim?

You are sounding as though it's FACT...and not opinion "once again".

Which is it?
 
Last edited:
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…