• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is Gun Control Such a Bad Idea?

No evidence again. Shocker. LOL

You need to stop trying to deflect to other people the precise moment you cannot defend your position. It's intellectually dishonest and massively immature.
 
How about no license needed to participate in your right? I'm here, typing away, using my 1A rights and all without a license.

While I agree with you in principle, I am also trying to be realistic. It would be hard enough to get people that are largely ignorant about guns and violence in to even agree with my proposal much less a truly liberal version of simply allowing people unrestrained access to the Right to bear arms.
 
How about no license needed to participate in your right? I'm here, typing away, using my 1A rights and all without a license.

We already license the right to bear arms in some jurisdictions
 
You need to stop trying to deflect to other people the precise moment you cannot defend your position. It's intellectually dishonest and massively immature.

Or he could just provide some evidence. LOL
 
We already license the right to bear arms in some jurisdictions

and under McDonald, some of those will probably remain and some with fall.
 
and under McDonald, some of those will probably remain and some with fall.

Predictions!!! Currently we license the right to bear arms and that has not changed
 
Predictions!!! Currently we license the right to bear arms and that has not changed

why don't you give us a scholarly argument on what will remain and what might be struck down and base it on the current supreme court case law
 
why don't you give us a scholarly argument on what will remain and what might be struck down and base it on the current supreme court case law
Why don't you? You have made a claim that some laws will be struck down based on Mcdonald. Please present a scholarly argument for such a claim with other precedent cases and verifiable references.

Watch this folks. LOL
 
Why don't you? You have made a claim that some laws will be struck down based on Mcdonald. Please present a scholarly argument for such a claim with other precedent cases and verifiable references.

Watch this folks. LOL

why aren't you ever able to back up your silly claims?
 
I love Canada's approach if you want a gun you have to get your parents approval and your wife's and or your ex-wifes. This would stop nearly all of the shootings that I have seen recently.
 
how many legally owned machine guns possessed by private citizens have been stolen? we know none have been used in decades for violent crimes. we also know that the sponsor of the ban never produced any evidence suggesting that was a problem. so you support banning stuff on the secondary hope that by banning them it will prevent criminals from stealing them and thus that impacts criminals. which is incredibly dishonest since the law doesn't impact criminals in terms of what the law does to them.

Great, the gun control law was overwhelmingly successful. Not only are machine guns virtually never used in the commission of a crime, but they're also still used by a small number of enthusiasts.
 
Great, the gun control law was overwhelmingly successful. Not only are machine guns virtually never used in the commission of a crime, but they're also still used by a small number of enthusiasts.

So why was the Hughes Amendment necessary. And that's legally owned machine guns. Unregistered ones are still used by criminals.
 
I gladly accept the forfeit implied by your inability to rebut any of that.

you are confused. your puny arguments have been destroyed many times over
 
Show me an idea that would actually be effective without unduly infringing on the law abiding, and I'll listen. Haven't heard one yet.

Gun control is incompatible with the Second Amendment, apparently.
 
Gun control is incompatible with the Second Amendment, apparently.

laws that punish people for harming others with guns don't violate the second amendment. Laws that prevent you from shooting firearms within city limits or in public parks don't either. Laws that prevent you from owning certain firearms etc do violate the second amendment
 
So why was the Hughes Amendment necessary. And that's legally owned machine guns. Unregistered ones are still used by criminals.

TD just admitted that it has been perfectly effective at preventing abuse.

you are confused. your puny arguments have been destroyed many times over

You are incorrect. If you had a counter-argument, you could articulate it. Your refusal to do so speaks for itself.
 
TD just admitted that it has been perfectly effective at preventing abuse.



You are incorrect. If you had a counter-argument, you could articulate it. Your refusal to do so speaks for itself.

you're lying

if the NFA was a so good at stopping crime why did liberals ban the guns?
 
Back
Top Bottom