If there was or is any doubt that the MSM does the bidding for the DNC, proof positive has been provided by this past weeks coverage of Hillary Clinton's announcement for the Democrat nomination and their over the top coverage of her caravan to Iowa. Several Republican candidates have announced and not one of them has received wall to wall daily coverage of the like that Clinton is receiving. It's frankly quite nauseating but there is one benefit. The media is so blatantly and transparently in the tank for Clinton that 19 months of this type of fawning coverage will surely turn the majority of Americans off as well as give them clear indication of the woman for whom she is and it won't be pretty.
CNN appears to be giving them all equal coverage.
If there was or is any doubt that the MSM does the bidding for the DNC, proof positive has been provided by this past weeks coverage of Hillary Clinton's announcement for the Democrat nomination and their over the top coverage of her caravan to Iowa. Several Republican candidates have announced and not one of them has received wall to wall daily coverage of the like that Clinton is receiving. It's frankly quite nauseating but there is one benefit. The media is so blatantly and transparently in the tank for Clinton that 19 months of this type of fawning coverage will surely turn the majority of Americans off as well as give them clear indication of the woman for whom she is and it won't be pretty.
The american people by in large don't want fair and balanced news. They want sensationalism and for someone to keep repeating to them "Don't worry, you're right".
What are you watching? On the three broadcast networks, I have not seen the type of coverage you claim is out there. Last night, 6:30 ABC barely mentioned Clinton, the night before 6:30 CBS barely mentioned Clinton. In fact not much was said of any candidate on those two broadcasts.
Again, you are ignoring the poll question which you challenged me on. Being left leaning, centrist, or just broadcasting the news is not being a mouthpiece for the Democrats.
Bull****
Maybe I turn on the station at the wrong time, because they're always talking about Rubio and Paul. Not so much Ted Cruz, I guess.
Here's an article from CNN on CNN's and other's coverage of Clinton before and after her announcement. Name a single Republican or other candidate that has gotten that focus?
The 'Hillary beat': How the media covers Clinton - Apr. 12, 2015
Your post makes no sense. You acknowledge that some are more progressive than others and that CNN has a phony balance, that tells me you basically agree that every major news outlet other than fox has a left lean. In that case, American is absolutely correct when he says that Fox IS the balance; in that it provides a rightward take to balance the leftward take that exists everywhere else. Its not victimization, its fact. The reason Fox is so popular is BECAUSE it is different from every other major news source.
Thank you.
That is about the best summation of the stagnancy that is American media I have ever read.
Fox News is number one not because of right wing leanings, it is number one because it fills a hole in the market.
Here's an article from CNN on CNN's and other's coverage of Clinton before and after her announcement. Name a single Republican or other candidate that has gotten that focus?
The 'Hillary beat': How the media covers Clinton - Apr. 12, 2015
The fact she's pretty much the heir apparent for the Democratic Primary while there are like 10 Republicans sharing the spotlight for the Republican Primary should result in her getting a lot of more focus.
A lot more focus that does not include one question. Let alone a serious question.
Sure, she's dodging questions. At the end of the day she will have to start answering questions or she won't be winning the white house.
That is the whole purpose of having the media following you around...you don't have to work as hard to get your message out.
At the end of the day she still doesn't have to take questions. The only time she has to take a question is during a debate and she can dodge answering them.
At the end of the day she still doesn't have to take questions. The only time she has to take a question is during a debate and she can dodge answering them.
Disappointing, but not surprising, to see yet ANOTHER ABUSE of the Poll section with a No-Choice political statement: NOT a POLL.You know they are, don't lie.
The fact she's pretty much the heir apparent for the Democratic Primary while there are like 10 Republicans sharing the spotlight for the Republican Primary should result in her getting a lot of more focus.
That is the whole purpose of having the media following you around...you don't have to work as hard to get your message out.
That's the reverse of what logic would dictate, if the media was interested in news and educating their audience. If Clinton is the heir apparent, why the need for wall to wall coverage of her ordering a sandwich or getting out of her SUV? If there are 10 Republicans sharing the spotlight, why not cover them more in depth so that their viewers get to know the choices and where they stand? You're just confirming that the media is parading the DNC's chosen message carrier because that's what they view their role as being. They're not interested in news and education - they're interesting in pimping their choice.
If there was or is any doubt that the MSM does the bidding for the DNC, proof positive has been provided by this past weeks coverage of Hillary Clinton's announcement for the Democrat nomination and their over the top coverage of her caravan to Iowa. Several Republican candidates have announced and not one of them has received wall to wall daily coverage of the like that Clinton is receiving. It's frankly quite nauseating but there is one benefit. The media is so blatantly and transparently in the tank for Clinton that 19 months of this type of fawning coverage will surely turn the majority of Americans off as well as give them clear indication of the woman for whom she is and it won't be pretty.
Disappointing, but not surprising, to see yet ANOTHER ABUSE of the Poll section with a No-Choice political statement: NOT a POLL.
Garbage.
You wanna say everyone but Fox is biased, put it in 'Bias in the Media'.
It's No poll with NO real choice.
How can one network compensate for so many other networks?If Fox News were indeed as fair and balances as they claim to be, they would actually balance the leftist media.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?