Is celebrating the canceling of Jimmy Kimmel evil?

[mike2810]

With who?

some voters who recognize his bs and name calling.

Do you really approve of a President that calls people names, threatens them because they do not agree with him and lies sometimes.
He still claims he won the 2020 election. Still spouts he will reduce rx prices by over 1000%.

Yes it has to do with broadcast communications. It's not a dictator it doesn't tell the president what he can and cannot say. In fact because it's part of the executive Branch the president dictates to the FCC what they can and cannot say.

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulates interstate and international communications by radio, television, wire, satellite, and cable in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and U.S. territories. An independent U.S. government agency overseen by Congress, the Commission is the federal agency responsible for implementing and enforcing America’s communications law and regulations.

https://www.fcc.gov/about/overview

Note the part where it says it is an Independent US govt. agency overseen by Congress. NOT as you think by the President.

They don't pull the license of their boss because he's their boss and can fire them.

you are partly confused. Do you also know what the Code of Federal Regulations are?

 

[CLAX1911]

some voters who recognize his bs and name calling.

So not really trouble just criticism that's fair.

Do you really approve of a President that calls people names, threatens them because they do not agree with him and lies sometimes.

I never supported Joe Biden.

He still claims he won the 2020 election. Still spouts he will reduce rx prices by over 1000%.

Prove that these are lies.

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulates interstate and international communications by radio, television, wire, satellite, and cable in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and U.S. territories. An independent U.S. government agency overseen by Congress, the Commission is the federal agency responsible for implementing and enforcing America’s communications law and regulations.

https://www.fcc.gov/about/overview

And they answer to the president Donald Trump is in charge of them not the other way around

Note the part where it says it is an Independent US govt. agency overseen by Congress.

That's false whether or not they're funded is based on Congressional allocation for budget but they're part of the executive branch a congressional branch agency is like the Smithsonian institute.

NOT as you think by the President.

It is as I think under the president it's executive branch most of those three letter organizations are executive branch

you are partly confused. Do you also know what the Code of Federal Regulations are?

You have to explain what that has to do with anything.

 

[soap box]

I listened to what he actually said in context.

He knew at the time, because the evidence was insurmountable, that the assassin(I won't say his name) was a radicalized leftist nut. He chose to ignore the facts. That's 100% on him.

Not exactly, Kimmel made the point that within minutes of the shot, the president claimed ithe shooter was a radical whatever without having any information.

"We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it. In between the finger-pointing, there was, uh, grieving. On Friday, the White House flew the flags at half-staff, which got some criticism, but on a human level, you can see how hard the president is taking this."

KIRK isn't the subject of any sentence he spoke. He insulted MAGA and Trump. Personally, just my opinion, I don't see an insult to Kirk.

 

[soap box]

Yet he knew at the time that he was EVERYTHING other than one of them.

It was a very stupid point because there was no "obsession with trying to prove". The proof was already out there.

Not so much. The bullet shell engraving was known but-
Post in thread - last Sunday afternoon, the 21st

That's "over the weekend".

 

[holbritter]

Here, please feel free to educate yourself in the Biden administration and Democrats censorship. Maybe it will cure your amnesia.

The Biden Administration Waged War on Free Speech with 57 Censorship Initiatives

President Joe Biden and his administration spent four years continuously attacking the First Amendment and the free speech rights enshrined by the nation’s Founders. The Biden administration’s censorship efforts ran the gamut from coercing and colluding with Big Tech platforms to silence his...

mrcfreespeechamerica.org

False narrative and a lie.

 

[Jack Fabulous]

Not exactly, Kimmel made the point that within minutes of the shot, the president claimed ithe shooter was a radical whatever without having any information.

"We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it. In between the finger-pointing, there was, uh, grieving. On Friday, the White House flew the flags at half-staff, which got some criticism, but on a human level, you can see how hard the president is taking this."

KIRK isn't the subject of any sentence he spoke. He insulted MAGA and Trump. Personally, just my opinion, I don't see an insult to Kirk.

I don't see an insult to Kirk, either, but I definitely see an insult to those grieving his death.

Look, this one IS on the left. The shooter IS a radicalized leftist nut. It IS a crime of hate. Kimmel made a terrible error in judgement when he tried to make the reaction to it a bigger story than the actual crime.

 

[soap box]

I don't see an insult to Kirk, either, but I definitely see an insult to those grieving his death.

Ok , for some. Some were grieving his death. However, it's a matter of interpretation to say most people who liked him didn't know him personally. To me, that's some degree of grief but not seven stages.

There were ample provisions of the political opportunism that Kimmel mentioned.

Look, this one IS on the left. The shooter IS a radicalized leftist nut. It IS a crime of hate. Kimmel made a terrible error in judgement

I agree with this.

when he tried to make the reaction to it a bigger story than the actual crime.

Maybe.

 

[Jagged]

It didn't make up new rules just to get Kimmel.

I didn't ask you if they made new rules. I asked you if the FCC had anything to do with this. So?

 

[Jagged]

No he wasn't. That wasn't a joke. He was lying, he knew he was lying the FCC requested a retraction and he refused.

If it was a joke he wouldn't have.

Nope, it was a joke. You know that's his job, right?

 

[Jagged]

I listened to what he actually said in context.

He knew at the time, because the evidence was insurmountable, that the assassin(I won't say his name) was a radicalized leftist nut. He chose to ignore the facts. That's 100% on him.

How could he know?

 

[CLAX1911]

I didn't ask you if they made new rules. I asked you if the FCC had anything to do with this. So?

Apparently

 

[CLAX1911]

Nope, it was a joke.

Then why didn't he say so? Maybe he's tired of being in television

You know that's his job, right?

Not anymore.

 

[soap box]

No.

Yes he does

No

Refusing to retract a lie.

Not regulated by the FCC

There's nothing in the Congressional FCC charter that creates an exception for the president. In our time, trump could commit any FCC crimes, be fined millions, he never pays, and he's never convicted, never accountable..so trump is regulated by the law but not law enforcement.

 

[Jagged]

Then why didn't he say so? Maybe he's tired of being in television

A host of a late night show, giving their opening monologue, does not need to declare every joke is a joke. It's a given and has been for nearly ¾ of a century.

Not anymore.

And it will be again.

 

[CLAX1911]

A host of a late night show, giving their opening monologue, does not need to declare every joke is a joke.

First I don't buy that it was a joke I think that's just an excuse you're making I think that he meant I'm serious when he said the lie that he said about Charlie Kirk's assassin. And if he didn't mean it why then when the network said you need to retract that didn't he say oh well it was a joke.

It wasn't a joke you're in denial.

It's a given and has been for nearly ¾ of a century.

Show evidence that it was a joke and if it was why didn't he talk to the network and explain that

And it will be again.

Unless he corrects his lie or explains somehow that it was a joke I don't think so.

He was fired because he refused to retract something he stated as fact.

 

[Jagged]

First I don't buy that it was a joke I think that's just an excuse you're making I think that he meant I'm serious when he said the lie that he said about Charlie Kirk's assassin. And if he didn't mean it why then when the network said you need to retract that didn't he say oh well it was a joke.

It wasn't a joke you're in denial.


Show evidence that it was a joke and if it was why didn't he talk to the network and explain that

Unless he corrects his lie or explains somehow that it was a joke I don't think so.

He was fired because he refused to retract something he stated as fact.

Lie? What lie did he tell?

 

[CLAX1911]

Lie? What lie did he tell?

He said the assassin that killed Kirk was right wing.

 

[Jagged]

He said the assassin that killed Kirk was right wing.

That you think he said that explains a lot. Now I understand why you don't know he was joking.

 

[mike2810]

So not really trouble just criticism that's fair.

I never supported Joe Biden.

Prove that these are lies.

Trump made the claim. waiting for Trump to prove what he says is true.

And they answer to the president Donald Trump is in charge of them not the other way around

That's false whether or not they're funded is based on Congressional allocation for budget but they're part of the executive branch a congressional branch agency is like the Smithsonian institute.

It is as I think under the president it's executive branch most of those three letter organizations are executive branch

You have to explain what that has to do with anything.

 

[CLAX1911]

Trump made the claim. waiting for Trump to prove what he says is true.

I'm sure that's a high priority on his list.

 

[CLAX1911]

That you think he said that explains a lot.

It's not that I think you said that not retracting that is what he was fired before

Now I understand why you don't know he was joking.

He didn't know he was joking if he did he'd probably still have a job.

 

[Jagged]

So not really trouble just criticism that's fair.

I never supported Joe Biden.

Prove that these are lies.

And they answer to the president Donald Trump is in charge of them not the other way around

That's false whether or not they're funded is based on Congressional allocation for budget but they're part of the executive branch a congressional branch agency is like the Smithsonian institute.

It is as I think under the president it's executive branch most of those three letter organizations are executive branch

You have to explain what that has to do with anything.

You need proof the price of something can't be reduced more than 100%? Scary.

And the proof he lied about the 2020 election is that every claim of fraud he cited was debunked and he even hired a company to find that fraud. When they didn't, he hired a second company to find that fraud. So he knew fraud :not be found. Even worse, despite hiring 2 firms to find fraud, he never told anyone he hired 2 firms to find fraud and they didn't find any. He tried keeping that a secret.

 

[CLAX1911]

You need proof the price of something can't be reduced more than 100%? Scary.

No I want proof of your claims if you can't prove them then they will be dismissed.

And the proof he lied about the 2020 election is that every claim of fraud he cited was debunked and he even hired a company to find that fraud.

No no show me where he claimed he definitively won the 2020 election I want proof that the lie was told or perhaps you're just remembering it incorrectly.

When they didn't, he hired a second company to find that fraud. So he knew fraud :not be found. Even worse, despite hiring 2 firms to find fraud, he never told anyone he hired 2 firms to find fraud and they didn't find any. He tried keeping that a secret.

So prove that he said he definitely won the 2020 election. I heard him say you should have won it and that's not a lie.

 

[Jagged]

No I want proof of your claims if you can't prove them then they will be dismissed.

No no show me where he claimed he definitively won the 2020 election I want proof that the lie was told or perhaps you're just remembering it incorrectly.

So prove that he said he definitely won the 2020 election. I heard him say you should have won it and that's not a lie.

That you don't know the price of something can't decrease more than 100% is just sad.



And that you don't know he said he won that election is even sadder.



"I've been in two elections. I won them both and the second one, I won much bigger than the first."

 

[Lord of Planar]