- Joined
- Jun 23, 2005
- Messages
- 32,513
- Reaction score
- 22,793
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
While he may be portraying himself that way, I personally do not equate the two positions. One may or may not hold both beliefs, of course.I have noticed that Senator Pat Roberts is billing himself in adds here in the Kansas City area as a Pro-Family Candidate because of his position against same sex marriage. Do you think that being anti-same sex marriage makes one pro-family?
In my opinion, if one is pro-family, then you are in favor of strong, stable, and loving families. If you are a politician that is pro-family, then you should support policies that encourage the formation of strong and stable families. I don't see how being anti-same sex marriage could be pro-family in any way.
I have noticed that Senator Pat Roberts is billing himself in adds here in the Kansas City area as a Pro-Family Candidate because of his position against same sex marriage. Do you think that being anti-same sex marriage makes one pro-family?
Anti-marriage is pro-family? Nonsense.
I have noticed that Senator Pat Roberts is billing himself in adds here in the Kansas City area as a Pro-Family Candidate because of his position against same sex marriage./QUOTE]Do you think that being anti-same sex marriage makes one pro-family?[
Anyone who is anti-same sex marriage is trying to deny others the same rights that he/she has.
That will not fly in the USA.
Wait and see.
family is family, it is that simple. Why refuse 2 gays or 2 lesbians from enjoying that same bliss of family life (if they want too). Being against gay-marriage shows you do not support families but only your views on what a family should be.
1.) unsupportable opinion that definitions disagree with1.)Being in favor of “same sex marriage” is not being in favor of marriage.
2.) It is, in fact, being on the side that directly seeks to attack and undermine true marriage.
3.) This is an unalterably anti-marriage and anti-family position, no matter how anyone might try to spin it otherwise.
One cannot honestly claim to be “pro-family” while supporting positions that directly attack and undermine true marriage and family.
1.)Family is what it is. marriage is what it is.
2.) Marriage, by definition, always has and always will be between a man and a woman. Period.
3.) A sick mockery of a “marriage”, between two homosexuals, never has been, never will be, and can never be in any way comparable to a genuine marriage.
4.) That's just not what marriage is.
5.) To insist that genuine marriage be treated as nothing more than an equivalent to this sick mockery thereof is to degrade and attack marriage itself.
6.) And to insists that a “family” can be built on a sick mockery, that is comparable to a genuine family built on a genuine marriage, is to attack family as well.
7.) You cannot honestly claim to be “pro-marriage” nor “pro-family”, if you support degrading these institutions to the level of the mockeries that the sick, immoral perverts want to impose on society.
Being in favor of “same sex marriage” is not being in favor of marriage. It is, in fact, being on the side that directly seeks to attack and undermine true marriage. This is an unalterably anti-marriage and anti-family position, no matter how anyone might try to spin it otherwise.
One cannot honestly claim to be “pro-family” while supporting positions that directly attack and undermine true marriage and family.
Marriage between a man and a woman is the most essential foundation of family.
This is an unalterably anti-marriage and anti-family position, no matter how anyone might try to spin it otherwise.
One cannot honestly claim to be “pro-family” while supporting positions that directly attack and undermine true marriage and family.
I'm not going to bother posting any links to back this up
Of course not.
I have noticed that Senator Pat Roberts is billing himself in adds here in the Kansas City area as a Pro-Family Candidate because of his position against same sex marriage. Do you think that being anti-same sex marriage makes one pro-family?
There's no need. The links have been posted a million times. Use google if you must.
It's obvious and simple.
What links? What evidence supports purposely denying a child a proper upbringing?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?