• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Is an acorn an oak tree?

I'm pretty sure I'd be a pro-choice though. Dying Fetuses seem to make me laugh.

No, no, young jedi. You haven't developed the requisite nonchalance to be a "pro-choice".
Dying fetuses should make you yawn.
They're not really relevant enough to be funny.

:yawn:
 
No, no, young jedi. You haven't developed the requisite nonchalance to be a "pro-choice".
Dying fetuses should make you yawn.
They're not really relevant enough to be funny.

:yawn:

So who decides which humans are relevant or irrelevant? You?:doh
 
So who decides which humans are relevant or irrelevant? You?:doh

When it comes to who gets to cram themselves up my twat, yeah. Me.
Does it not work that way in Tallouville?
 
Surgery is pretty gross but genuinely it is being done for a "positive" reason.

Every surgery, without exception, kills cells that are undeniably human. Hell, being alive kills human cells. I guess that makes you a murderer, huh?
 
So who decides which humans are relevant or irrelevant? You?:doh

The people actually involved in the decision, which last I checked, you weren't one of them. If you're so damn worried about it, why don't you have the fetus surgically implanted in your own body at your own expense, give birth to it and raise it for 18 years.

Otherwise, butt the hell out.
 
Every surgery, without exception, kills cells that are undeniably human. Hell, being alive kills human cells. I guess that makes you a murderer, huh?

There's a HUGE difference between a living human organism which constitutes A HUMAN (noun) and some cells that are human (adjective.)

I don't mourn hair and skin cells that wash down the drain every morning. Quit putting forth infantile notions. If you can't address the point then go think on it awhile. Don't just make up some goofy $hit and then respond to the goofy $hit you made up AS IF you're responding to me.
 
Every surgery, without exception, kills cells that are undeniably human. Hell, being alive kills human cells. I guess that makes you a murderer, huh?

Those cells aren't a being, they are not a complete human being are they, they will never be a complete human being will they.

But since you are just a bunch of cells is it OK if I kill all those cells?
 
When it comes to who gets to cram themselves up my twat, yeah. Me.
Does it not work that way in Tallouville?

You are certainly free to decide what other person tries to cram their penis into your twat. But if you allow it and you create a new life by doing so you are talking a different matter indeed.
 
But since you are just a bunch of cells is it OK if I kill all those cells?

You're welcome to try but since society has determined that murder is illegal and abortion is not, you'd be held accountable and punished for your actions, unlike a woman having a perfectly legal abortion.

Surely even you can see the difference.
 
You're welcome to try but since society has determined that murder is illegal and abortion is not, you'd be held accountable and punished for your actions, unlike a woman having a perfectly legal abortion.

Surely even you can see the difference.

Explain the rational behind it, it you are just a bunch of cells and it's legal to kill a bunch of cells why would you object?

I know the difference, it's you who seems confused going back to your original statement.
 
Explain the rational behind it, it you are just a bunch of cells and it's legal to kill a bunch of cells why would you object?

Like I said, give it a shot, see where it gets you.

I know the difference, it's you who seems confused going back to your original statement.

I'm not confused at all, society has decided that one is legal and one is illegal, society places much more importance on one than the other. You may not like that, but since when did what you liked or didn't like mean a damn thing?
 
What the **** is up with these sick abortion images. People who post that **** are as bad as enviro-nutjobs who post slaughterhouse pictures.

The irony is that the most graphic are entopic pregnancies (the fetus gets stuck in fallopian tubes and must be removed to save the life of the mother).
Anti-choicers would rather both mother and fetus die than allow this kind of abortion. Picture just for fun, guys...chill!:cool:

MENFOLK.jpg
 
I actually don't ever recall "cramming" my kids up my twat.

Then you've never been raped. Think you should be forced by the Religious Right to bear a rapist's fetus to term and release the resulting offspring into the population with his father's troglodyte genes? Maybe that is why we have to suffer so many killers like Bush, the Myanmar Military, Saddam, the Sudanese military, Rummy, Gonzales, etc.

bending_liberty1.jpg
 
Then you've never been raped.

Actually I never have been raped but the way you arrived at that conclusion is very illogical. Odds are if I were raped I wouldn't have gotten pregnant and given that; it's unwise to assume that I've never been raped because I don't recall cramming my kids up my twat.

But whatever.

Where the hell is Jallman?????????????

Think you should be forced by the Religious Right to bear a rapist's fetus to term and release the resulting offspring into the population with his father's troglodyte genes?
If I were raped I'd seek treatment and as part of that treatment I'd be sure to get the MAP. If a hospital refused to give me the MAP I'd go elsewhere for treatment.

All your hysteria aside pregnancy resulting from rape isn't common. And if you get treated for the rape, including the MAP, then the chances you'll get pregnant are so small they're hardly worth even talking about.


Maybe that is why we have to suffer so many killers like Bush, the Myanmar Military, Saddam, the Sudanese military, Rummy, Gonzales, etc.
Are you implying these people are all the products of RAPE or that they all should have just been aborted?

Try making sense before posting.

JALLMAN WHERE DID YOU GO???????

Anyone know?
 
“Everyone has their cutoff point.”

Wow what a scientific statement? :rofl

“Are you implying that people don't know what abortion doctors do? Gynecologists don't need to advertise because "everyone knows" what they do. Perhaps... just perhaps... folks know what abortion providers do too, and "advertising" isn't necessary. Just a thought. I know it might be tough to grasp.”


Sure they do and thats exactly why an abortionist won't put his name and what he does outside his office.

Open your phone books yellow pages and look under abortions. How many doctors names are listed. It's legal for crying out loud. WHY DON’T ABORTION DOCTORS ADVERTISE? Killing is big business these days.

I think you know exactly why but you can’t admit it.

“Gynecologists do specific jobs too. So do brain surgeons. Why don't they advertise?”

They are not afraid to have their names listed in phone books. Both these types of doctors have numbers listed in phone books.


“That would be bad for business, woudn't it? If no one knew what they did? Be pretty hard to get clients.”

Well people might just hold it against them. That is if they listed their name in a phone book as an abortionist.

“Based on medical science that shows us the development of the nervous system and thus gives capacity for thought. It's not my "opinion", it's science.”


Medical science says that life starts at conception. At the time of Roe medical doctors testified to this fact. The Supreme Court did not listen to what science had to say.

You said you were pro-choice. You said a woman has the right to kill. Forget science…..do you condone a womans right to kill at anytime?


“I'm pretty sure I'd be a pro-choice though. Dying Fetuses seem to make me laugh.”

"No, no, young jedi. You haven't developed the requisite nonchalance to be a "pro-choice"


Dying fetuses should make you yawn.
They're not really relevant enough to be funny.’


You know every once in a while I encounter someone who opens their mouth and its like looking into the mouth of a monster. Two such people right here.
 
You know every once in a while I encounter someone who opens their mouth and its like looking into the mouth of a monster. Two such people right here.

Cool. Wanna look again?

:yawn:
 
Actually I never have been raped but the way you arrived at that conclusion is very illogical. Odds are if I were raped I wouldn't have gotten pregnant and given that; it's unwise to assume that I've never been raped because I don't recall cramming my kids up my twat.

But whatever.

Where the hell is Jallman?????????????

If I were raped I'd seek treatment and as part of that treatment I'd be sure to get the MAP. If a hospital refused to give me the MAP I'd go elsewhere for treatment.

All your hysteria aside pregnancy resulting from rape isn't common. And if you get treated for the rape, including the MAP, then the chances you'll get pregnant are so small they're hardly worth even talking about.


Are you implying these people are all the products of RAPE or that they all should have just been aborted?

Try making sense before posting.

JALLMAN WHERE DID YOU GO???????

Anyone know?

Are you aware that many religious right pharmacists will refuse you the MAP because they consider it to be abortion? After conception takes place, the Religious Right believes you must be forced to bear to term, rape or not.

pharm_mikhaela_net.jpg
 
Are you aware that many religious right pharmacists will refuse you the MAP because they consider it to be abortion? After conception takes place, the Religious Right believes you must be forced to bear to term, rape or not.

pharm_mikhaela_net.jpg

I'm aware that pharmacies are a dime a dozen and you don't even need a script for the MAP any longer. :roll:
 
I'm aware that pharmacies are a dime a dozen and you don't even need a script for the MAP any longer. :roll:


Are you aware that many religious right pharmacists will refuse you the MAP because they consider it to be abortion? I repeat the question because it illustrates the thinking of Red States unduly influenced by RW religion. THIS is what's wrong with Kansas (and Utah and any population that has been persuaded to vote GOP due to the Abortion issue).:doh
 
Sure they do and thats exactly why an abortionist won't put his name and what he does outside his office.
My gynecologist doesn't have a sign saying he does pap smears. Must be something wrong with doing them since he doesn't advertise it on the street.

Open your phone books yellow pages and look under abortions. How many doctors names are listed. It's legal for crying out loud. WHY DON’T ABORTION DOCTORS ADVERTISE? Killing is big business these days.
I have opened my phone book and looked under abortion. It's how I found the provider I used. Funny that, huh? I wonder how something can be such "big business" if no one knows who the abortion providers are and/or what they do?

I think you know exactly why but you can’t admit it.
Because you don't have a fricken clue what you're talking about? And are rambling off on some tangent that makes no bloody sense?

They are not afraid to have their names listed in phone books. Both these types of doctors have numbers listed in phone books.
So do abortion providers, otherwise, women wouldn't know where the hell to go.

Well people might just hold it against them. That is if they listed their name in a phone book as an abortionist.
I'm sure some abortion providers do feel some fear from right-wing, self-righteous jerks who might try and kill them because they think killing a human is 'wrong'.

Medical science says that life starts at conception. At the time of Roe medical doctors testified to this fact. The Supreme Court did not listen to what science had to say.
Of course life begins at conception. And?

You said you were pro-choice. You said a woman has the right to kill. Forget science…..do you condone a womans right to kill at anytime?
Asked and answered. About 3 times now.
 
Anti-choicers would rather both mother and fetus die than allow this kind of abortion.

Where on earth do you get that idea? If the mothers life is in danger I know of no opposition to an abortion to save her life.
 
Are you aware that many religious right pharmacists will refuse you the MAP because they consider it to be abortion? I repeat the question because it illustrates the thinking of Red States unduly influenced by RW religion. THIS is what's wrong with Kansas (and Utah and any population that has been persuaded to vote GOP due to the Abortion issue).:doh

There is another thread about pharmacist and the MAP, why not take the discussion there? But I will ask this if you are selling fishing licenses and supplies but oppose guns should the government force you to sell guns to to satisfy my right to won one?
 
Are you aware that many religious right pharmacists will refuse you the MAP because they consider it to be abortion? I repeat the question because it illustrates the thinking of Red States unduly influenced by RW religion. THIS is what's wrong with Kansas (and Utah and any population that has been persuaded to vote GOP due to the Abortion issue).:doh

Uh then don't go to religious right pharmacists. :roll:
 
Back
Top Bottom