• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is alcohol abuse a "disability"?

Is alcohol abuse a disability; do you agree or disagree with the EEOC?


  • Total voters
    37
  • Poll closed .
You've been unclear. You said that long-term use of pot causes "memory to fade" It doesn't. It causes a deterioration in the ability to form new memories. Your claim about fading memories implies an effect on long-term memory.

Long term use affects memory in a negative way.

I used a broad---correct---statement.
 
That statement is correct. Your previous statement was incorrect

That was your interpretation.

You assumed I meant long-term memory when I meant memory in general was affected by long-term use..

 
Got a source for that claim?

Government website:

Marijuana - InfoFacts - NIDA

 
That was your interpretation.

You assumed I meant long-term memory when I meant memory in general was affected by long-term use..


No, you said that long term us "causes memory to fade". It doesn't
 
No, you said that long term us "causes memory to fade". It doesn't

Meaning that the short-term memory is affected. Perhaps I wasn't specific enough but the point still stands.

How specific would you like to be in debate because being obscenely technical can be annoying at best for all involved.
 
You obviously don't understand what you just posted.

It doesn't say that long term use causes memory to fade. It says that there is no long-term effect on memory.

Stop saying that I meant long-term memory. I never mentioned it.
 
Meaning that the short-term memory is affected. Perhaps I wasn't specific enough but the point still stands.

How specific would you like to be in debate because being obscenely technical can be annoying at best for all involved.

No, short-term memory doesn't "fade". You not only weren't specific enough; you were wrong

And no one was being overly "technical". You were corrected and couldn't handle it, so now you're complaining about being corrected with more accurate info.

Pot does not cause memories to "fade". It interferes with a persons ability to form new memories
 
Stop saying that I meant long-term memory. I never mentioned it.

It's the only logical conclusion. Memories dont reside in short-term memory. If memories are going "fade" then it is long term memory that is being effected. Your ignorance of this fact is no excuse for your whining about being corrected with more accurate info
 
Perhaps "fade" wasn't the right word to use when explaining that marijuana affects memory. Make sure you never use the wrong word in the future, Sangha.

There are some studies that indicate marijuana does affect long-term memory, but I'll research it more in the future. This one makes me wonder:


NIDA - Publications - Marijuana: Facts for Teens

 

lol a .gov site? Don't waste my time.
 

Fade was the wrong word to use. Thanks for FINALLY acknowledging that. When I say something unclear, I own up to it right away.

And your quote says nothing about pot affecting long-term memory. I'm beginning to wonder about your history of pot use
 
Back to the original argument: so-what do you suggest? Pay them more than what the position usually pays?

IMO, it depends on the difference in pay. If it's large, then they should pay them what they used to earn, or give them a higher paying position. Remember, the ADA does not apply to small businesses. Businesses large enough to fall under the ADA usually have a variety of job positions. In a trucking company specifically, the drivers are typically not the highest paid employees. The mgrs in charge of dispatching and loading the trucks make more
 

Imo, if a job with equal pay is available, fine, he should get that job. If not- tough. All of us have problems. I have problems that prevent me from getting and/or keeping certain jobs. I don't realistically expect to get compensation for that.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…