I'm not assuming any particular thing as certain. I just believe it all stems from human behavior at the individual level, and I don't think any wrongdoing was ordered. It is possible, but I find it less likely since any supervisor would know they could be fired for such actions.
Looks like we disagree. I think there would be whistle blowers if such orders were given. Have you read of any?It is much more believable that orders was given to target those groups for political gains then some rogue local workers for ideological reasons
people don't blow the whistle unless they have something to gain or to protect or they have an ax to grind very few do it out of conscience remember we are talking about the IRS they don't have a conscienceLooks like we disagree. I think there would be whistle blowers if such orders were given. Have you read of any?
Regardless, any of the people who abuse such positions need to be fired.
Do you agree with that?
LOL...people don't blow the whistle unless they have something to gain or to protect or they have an ax to grind very few do it out of conscience remember we are talking about the IRS they don't have a conscience
IRS apologizes for inappropriately targeting conservative political groups in 2012 election - The Washington Post
This actually bothers me more than Benghazi...
Looks like we disagree. I think there would be whistle blowers if such orders were given. Have you read of any?
Regardless, any of the people who abuse such positions need to be fired.
Do you agree with that?
I consider it all of a piece. An incompetent, corrupt Administration, elected by people thinking like spoiled and illiterate children but who had the temerity to vote.
In a nation where we have free speech this should never happen. One of the biggest fears with bloated bureaucracy is that they will use their position to squash or hinder political groups or people they don't like.
My concern is I wonder how high up this goes. The person in charge of trying to disadvantage conservative groups does not need to have his/her position and abuse his/her authority to try and squash groups they don't like. Charges should be made if applicable, trying to disadvantage a group based on their beliefs is a very severe form government oppression in my opinion and should not be tolerated at all. This is what I would expect from more totalitarian nations with less freedom like China, Iran, or Russia. This should absolutely not be happening in the United States where one of our chief principals is freedom of speech and the right to believe what you want without the government impeding upon that.
The IRS apologizes? That's it?
The IRS has the power to destroy a business, or an individual, even if the business or individual is innocent of any wrongdoing.
It's not surprising, but should be inconceivable, that a low-level IRS hack could be in a position to stalk groups at their own whim.
Heads should roll.
That an apology was deemed sufficient speaks volumes of the arrogance of the above the law forces that make up the Internal Revenue Service.
This bothers me more than Benghazi because this points to abuse of power and using the power of the government to fill personal ends. That was the sort of thing that got Nixon in trouble and should be the sort of thing that we don't tolerate.
Benghazi's a question of troop levels and deployments. It's a question of inadequate security. It's unfortunate that some bad decisions were made, but everything's easy in retrospect.
As far as the media goes, this is being reported by WaPo. They're as mainstream and as liberal as it gets.
You don't know that. You're reaching.
Knowing the Tea Party activists and who funds them, I suspect that they probably were pretty near the edge of that fine line. That the "special scrutiny" singled them out is improper, but it's not exactly malicious. It's just looking a little closer at the house across the street with smoke pouring out its windows.
IRS apologizes for targeting conservative groups
[Lois Lerner, head of the division that oversees tax-exempt groups] said the "practice was initiated by low-level workers in Cincinnati and was not motivated by political bias". After her talk, she told The AP that no high level IRS officials knew about the practice. She did not say when they found out.
Are they for real? do they think we are that stupid to believe that BS?
That's why I'm more concerned about this than the bs called "Benghazi".If the groups were near the edge of that fine line, wouldn't you think it would be OK to give them more scrutiny? If it is OK why did they apologize?
They must have thought they did something wrong.
No claim that I know of, I'm just going by who obama is and his association with radical leftist.
Looks like we disagree. I think there would be whistle blowers if such orders were given. Have you read of any?
Regardless, any of the people who abuse such positions need to be fired.
Do you agree with that?
AP Exclusive: Watchdog report says senior IRS officials knew tea party groups targeted in 2011 - The Washington Post
WASHINGTON — A federal watchdog’s upcoming report says senior Internal Revenue Service officials knew agents were targeting tea party groups in 2011.
The disclosure contradicts public statements by former IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman, who repeatedly assured Congress that conservative groups were not targeted.
The plot thickens
Don't need to start a new thread. This one will do just fine.
Using Government agencies/institutions to target political opposition = Fascism
Have a nice day :2wave:
Fascism is actually a fairly specific ideology. It's not just a synonym for "big overbearing government."
*Fourteen Defining Characteristics Of Fascism
Sounds like liberals huh? :lamo
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?