• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Iran ditches uranium limits, US no longer fighting ISIS.

RetiredUSN said:
Israel will have something to say about Iran's bombs.
Click to expand...

They tried to, numerous times. They spent decades with assassinations and sabotage to try to stop it and they failed.

That's why we made the agreement.
 
RetiredUSN said:
Making deals with people who have been killing our soldiers for 18 years.

Sweet deal.............right?
Click to expand...


This administration is about to do the same with the Taliban. If there's an armed conflict, you're going to have to sit at the table to end it if you can't wipe the opponent out.
 
Rexedgar said:
There’s always a tweet.....
Click to expand...
As George Will once said, 'Trump can tell you everything he knows about any topic in 140 characters.'
 
RetiredUSN said:
Your deflection is pointless.

Obama was making deals with Iran fully knowing that their henchman was killing American soldiers.

WTF does that say about Obama or you for that matter?
Click to expand...

You guys had no problem flushing a few thousand soldiers down the ****ter in 2003, for no reason at all.

Now you're ready to do it again.
 
Jredbaron96 said:
They tried to, numerous times. They spent decades with assassinations and sabotage to try to stop it and they failed.

That's why we made the agreement.
Click to expand...

We stopped them.

If you are naive enough to believe that Iran's influence in neighboring Syria will go unchallenged, then I have a bridge you can buy real cheap.
 
Hamish Howl said:
All you have to do is prove that.
Click to expand...

No, no no, world doesn't work like that now, NOW....you can make accusations and people have to prove they are innocent, didn't you understand that in the Impeachment hearings??
 
Hamish Howl said:
You guys had no problem flushing a few thousand soldiers down the ****ter in 2003, for no reason at all.

Now you're ready to do it again.
Click to expand...

My guys?

Please stop with the assumptions because it only makes you look stupid.

I quit the republican party during "shock and awe"
 
RetiredUSN said:
We stopped them.
Click to expand...

That's right, with an agreement made by the Obama Administration.

That is now defunct.

If you are naive enough to believe that Iran's influence in neighboring Syria will go unchallenged, then I have a bridge you can buy real cheap.
Click to expand...

When did I say it would go unchallenged?
 
Fletch said:
Thats not how things work here. Obama needed to submit it to the Senate for ratification, but he never did. Therefore, his signature on that piece of paper only meant something so long as he was president.
Click to expand...

Didn't used to be like that. Clinton ratified Bush's NAFTA. If Obama had negotiated NAFTA but not had time to get it ratified Trump would have ****-canned it.
 
sjmay said:
No, no no, world doesn't work like that now, NOW....you can make accusations and people have to prove they are innocent, didn't you understand that in the Impeachment hearings??
Click to expand...

Don't be an ass. The impeachment charges have to be proven and you know it. You're just being childish and petulant.
 
Chomsky said:
But wait, Tucker now disagrees with Trump! :2razz:
Click to expand...

Tucker didn't just start disagreeing with Trump. Perhaps you just noticed.
 
Grand Mal said:
Didn't used to be like that. Clinton ratified Bush's NAFTA. If Obama had negotiated NAFTA but not had time to get it ratified Trump would have ****-canned it.
Click to expand...

It was always 'like that'. NAFTA was a treaty and was submitted for ratification. He also worked with those across the isle to ensure it would be ratified.

Obama never submitted the agreements he made. They weren't classified as treaties. They were bad deals - and he knew they wouldn't pass the senate.
 
When you gotta use your own troops to defend your embassy from Iraqis that are having peace treaties with Iran you know something is going wrong. Why is our embassy there? If we have to defend it ourselves its not a real embassy and shouldnt be there.
 
jimbo said:
Does anybody besides me remember that we didn't pick this fight. But we lost no people and no real estate. They lost 1. Vs the last attempted embassy takeover where we lost 4 and all our real estate.
Click to expand...

Why would this matter to the anti-Trump brigade?
When have they ever cared about facts?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom