HU-210
Member
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2005
- Messages
- 172
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- Maastricht - Netherlands
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
A somewhat long title, but the subject sadly does not lend itself to a unified term. Now, I'm not one to condemn the internet on any basis, myself using it on a quite, as I perceive it, aware level of its advantages and disadvantages, I do wish to ask what other people feel about the ethical implications of the distribution of 'internet nodes', ergo the access points to internet.
These nodes do not only restrict itself to the western world, where the content is largely regulated, but also African nations. The poor people of this earth (speaking of material wealth) have access to the internet, and find their the material wealth with which we surround ourselves. Computer Games, music, videos, mp3-players, there is a huge community on the internet dealing with the capitalistic acquisition of wealth, and seeing how more websites seem to spring up everyday, and the familiarity of some (who doesn't know ebay/amazon?) it's difficult to believe that this is a passing trend.
Ergo, these poor people find themselves in a position with large access to the things we have, or what they perceive we have (myself I don't have a cellphone or mp3-player, and I perhaps naively presume I am not the only one). In any case, we have a large amount of people to whom we show, through electrical windows what we are having for Christmas. Our intervention has lead to their wanting a part of our wealth (which is not that hard to imagine), and it seems an irreversible act (we can't go into Africa guns-blazing removing the internet, can we?).
What do you feel about this 'issue'? After all, 'we' sustain the internet and this phenomenon by watching websites, watching adds companies pay for, and perhaps buying things over the internet.
Mr U
These nodes do not only restrict itself to the western world, where the content is largely regulated, but also African nations. The poor people of this earth (speaking of material wealth) have access to the internet, and find their the material wealth with which we surround ourselves. Computer Games, music, videos, mp3-players, there is a huge community on the internet dealing with the capitalistic acquisition of wealth, and seeing how more websites seem to spring up everyday, and the familiarity of some (who doesn't know ebay/amazon?) it's difficult to believe that this is a passing trend.
Ergo, these poor people find themselves in a position with large access to the things we have, or what they perceive we have (myself I don't have a cellphone or mp3-player, and I perhaps naively presume I am not the only one). In any case, we have a large amount of people to whom we show, through electrical windows what we are having for Christmas. Our intervention has lead to their wanting a part of our wealth (which is not that hard to imagine), and it seems an irreversible act (we can't go into Africa guns-blazing removing the internet, can we?).
What do you feel about this 'issue'? After all, 'we' sustain the internet and this phenomenon by watching websites, watching adds companies pay for, and perhaps buying things over the internet.
Mr U