• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Inside the far-right militias preparing for the election's aftermath

swing_voter

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
13,042
Reaction score
8,463
Location
'Murica
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Independent



Crazy people with guns. Do you think this is a good look for the pro-gun side? What's the average voter going to think when they see this?

What's going to happen when on the battle field the militia has to withdraw? Those old and fat people can't run. Are they going to leave them to get slaughtered?

How are they going to replenish their rounds? You can go through 200 rounds in a short period of time.

And all this is because they don't like masks and social distancing? That's laughable.
 
I still feel that no such "war" will take place. A few small groups might get arrested for planning things, but the Feds will handle it in much the same way they handle traditional terrorism.
 



Crazy people with guns. Do you think this is a good look for the pro-gun side? What's the average voter going to think when they see this?

What's going to happen when on the battle field the militia has to withdraw? Those old and fat people can't run. Are they going to leave them to get slaughtered?

How are they going to replenish their rounds? You can go through 200 rounds in a short period of time.

And all this is because they don't like masks and social distancing? That's laughable.


Funny.

The 2A mentions "militia." At the time of the Revolution, every able bodied male 16 and older could be (and often was) a member of the local militia. Most Leftists try to argue (absurdly) that the 2A ONLY protects "militias," and even then only those organized by the government.

The fact is, any group of citizens can "organize" into a militia. The "Whisky Rebellion" was based on such militia, and President Washington eventually organized a larger militia to put it down.

So make fun of this all you wish. But don't be either surprised or dismissive as the Left seems wont to do. Note that many of those citizens raised their hands when asked if they had served in the US Armed Forces.

They aren't as "untrained" or "foolish" as you think.
 
Funny.

The 2A mentions "militia." At the time of the Revolution, every able bodied male 16 and older could (and often was) a member of the local militia. Most Leftists try to argue (absurdly) that the 2A ONLY protects "militias," and even then only those organized by the government.

The fact is, any group of citizens can "organize" into a militia. The "Whisky Rebellion" was based on such militia, and President Washington eventually organized a larger militia to put it down.

So make fun of this all you wish. But don't be either surprised or dismissive as the Left seem wont to do. Note that many of those citizens raised their hands when asked if they had served in the US Armed Forces.

They aren't as "untrained" or "foolish" as you think.

We're not the ones who are downplaying the existential threat of right-wing terrorism. You are.
 
Funny.

The 2A mentions "militia." At the time of the Revolution, every able bodied male 16 and older could be (and often was) a member of the local militia. Most Leftists try to argue (absurdly) that the 2A ONLY protects "militias," and even then only those organized by the government.

The fact is, any group of citizens can "organize" into a militia. The "Whisky Rebellion" was based on such militia, and President Washington eventually organized a larger militia to put it down.

So make fun of this all you wish. But don't be either surprised or dismissive as the Left seems wont to do. Note that many of those citizens raised their hands when asked if they had served in the US Armed Forces.

They aren't as "untrained" or "foolish" as you think.
If they try an uprising they will find out how foolish they truly are. Protecting yourself and community is far different for pro active aggressive action.
I am not against Militias per say, what their goals are is often a different matter.
By the way the boogaloo boy Wants a fight, and he obviously did Not serve, he almost looks giddy, right up until he takes some incoming and see what it means.
 
The 2A mentions "militia." At the time of the Revolution, every able bodied male 16 and older could be (and often was) a member of the local militia. Most Leftists try to argue (absurdly) that the 2A ONLY protects "militias," and even then only those organized by the government.

The fact is, any group of citizens can "organize" into a militia. The "Whisky Rebellion" was based on such militia, and President Washington eventually organized a larger militia to put it down.

Every able-bodied man between the ages of 18 and 45 is automatically a member of the Reserve Militia, according to the Militia Act of 1903. Since the prefatory clause of the 2A stipulates "a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State" as the purpose of the amendment, anyone exercising their 2A rights by taking up arms is doing so toward that purpose. They are also, therefore, identifying themselves as part of the Militia.
 
Back
Top Bottom