- Joined
- Apr 28, 2015
- Messages
- 103,343
- Reaction score
- 93,695
- Location
- Third Coast
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
re: The thread title
It would seem he might be 72% of the way there!
"As of 10:15 p.m. ET, Ossoff had 50.4% of the vote, with 72% of the vote in, according to Edison Research."
Source: CNN: In Georgia special election, can a Democrat get above 50%?
This is being billed as a referendum on Trump. While I can't ascertain that claim, both parties have been throwing tons of resources at this in terms of dollars, media, people, and pols. And Trump himself did 6 Tweets in two days with a robo-call for good luck!
We shall see. But it's looking close.
re: The thread title
It would seem he might be 72% of the way there!
"As of 10:15 p.m. ET, Ossoff had 50.4% of the vote, with 72% of the vote in, according to Edison Research."
Source: CNN: In Georgia special election, can a Democrat get above 50%?
This is being billed as a referendum on Trump. While I can't ascertain that claim, both parties have been throwing tons of resources at this in terms of dollars, media, people, and pols. And Trump himself did 6 Tweets in two days with a robo-call for good luck!
We shall see. But it's looking close.
re: The thread title
It would seem he might be 72% of the way there!
"As of 10:15 p.m. ET, Ossoff had 50.4% of the vote, with 72% of the vote in, according to Edison Research."
Source: CNN: In Georgia special election, can a Democrat get above 50%?
This is being billed as a referendum on Trump. While I can't ascertain that claim, both parties have been throwing tons of resources at this in terms of dollars, media, people, and pols. And Trump himself did 6 Tweets in two days with a robo-call for good luck!
We shall see. But it's looking close.
It was a pretty big mistake hanging symbolic hopes on a House race in a red district, regardless of how far behind a Democrat was historically supposed to be.
Yeah, that's my feeling too for some unknown reason.I think it's gonna be pretty close, but still not enough to pull out a win.
Thanks! :cheers:Here's a site for live election results: Election Night Reporting
Yeah, that's my feeling too for some unknown reason.
It just seems to be a Dem quality as of late ...
It's both, a referendum on Trump, and an example of population demographic and ideological change.
This district has been an island surrounded by Democrat districts, and has been long overdue for a shift in voting.
Yes, agreed that it will likely flip back in a regular election due to a preponderance of GOP voters.Nah... even if Ossoff wins, I expect it to flip back in the next election. North of Atlanta is not liberal in any stretch of the imagination. It is upper class suburbia.
Yeah, that's my feeling too for some unknown reason.
It just seems to be a Dem quality as of late ...
This is just the beginning, as GOPs also have MT-AL to worry about next month .
Yes, agreed that it will likely flip back in a regular election due to a preponderance of GOP voters.
But as a special election, it is interesting in that some believe it gives reflection of mood and enthusiasm. With Trump's heavy involvement, at the least it would be seen as another in the line of his consistent failures.
There was something anecdotal that might give Dems some solace. Some showing-up at the election claimed they were sorry for staying home for 2016 and for not having taken it seriously.Ossoff is the first of the millenial generation, has excited a new base in the South, has a fantastic ground game and an awesome small donor fund-raising machine.
As a pragmatic moderate who can speak without insulting others as trump did to him, he's attracting INDYs and causing thoughtful GOPs to take a 2nd look.
This is just the beginning, as GOPs also have MT-AL to worry about next month .
What is this race you speak of?
May 25, 2017; to replace MT-at large Rep. Zinke, who is now Sec. Of Interior; Dem Quist v. GOP Gianforte; Quist is a folk legend in MT; Gianforte is a billionaire from NJ trying to buy this at-large seat .
There was something anecdotal that might give Dems some solace. Some showing-up at the election claimed they were sorry for staying home for 2016 and for not having taken it seriously.
If the above is even a slight mood among Dems, that would be a very good thing. It wouldn't have taken much additional turnout to have stopped Trump.
Well I like the looks of this:
Only the 2nd endorsement by Sanders since the November election.
re: The thread title
It would seem he might be 72% of the way there!
"As of 10:15 p.m. ET, Ossoff had 50.4% of the vote, with 72% of the vote in, according to Edison Research."
Source: CNN: In Georgia special election, can a Democrat get above 50%?
This is being billed as a referendum on Trump. While I can't ascertain that claim, both parties have been throwing tons of resources at this in terms of dollars, media, people, and pols. And Trump himself did 6 Tweets in two days with a robo-call for good luck!
We shall see. But it's looking close.
There was a really red area that was late reporting for some reason. (I'm guessing illegals). That will give the repub the win.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?