• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Immediate Expansion of American Timber Production

HumblePi

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 3, 2018
Messages
28,651
Reaction score
22,039
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Moderate
Immediate Expansion of American Timber Production
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presiden...iate-expansion-of-american-timber-production/
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered:

Section 1. Purpose. The production of timber, lumber, paper, bioenergy, and other wood products (timber production) is critical to our Nation's well-being. Timber production is essential for crucial human activities like construction and energy production. Furthermore, as recent disasters demonstrate, forest management and wildfire risk reduction projects can save American lives and communities.

The United States has an abundance of timber resources that are more than adequate to meet our domestic timber production needs, but heavy-handed Federal policies have prevented full utilization of these resources and made us reliant on foreign producers. Our inability to fully exploit our domestic timber supply has impeded the creation of jobs and prosperity, contributed to wildfire disasters, degraded fish and wildlife habitats, increased the cost of construction and energy, and threatened our economic security. These onerous Federal policies have forced our Nation to rely upon imported lumber, thus exporting jobs and prosperity and compromising our self-reliance. It is vital that we reverse these policies and increase domestic timber production to protect our national and economic security.

Sec. 2. Directives to the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture.

(a) Within 30 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture, through the Director of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the Chief of the United States Forest Service (USFS), respectively, shall each issue new or updated guidance regarding tools to facilitate increased timber production and sound forest management, reduce time to deliver timber, and decrease timber supply uncertainty, such as the Good Neighbor Authority described in 16 U.S.C. 2113a, stewardship contracting pursuant to 16 U.S.C. 6591c, and agreements or contracts with Indian tribes under the Tribal Forest Protection Act as contemplated by 25 U.S.C. 3115a
_________________________________________________________
Does everyone understand what this executive order means? It means that the US plans to deforest our National Parks to make up for the shortfall of lumber coming from Canada due to Trump's tariffs. It means that Trump just ordered swaths of our national forests to be cut down, 280 million acres, to be exact. All for cheaper lumber. This EO means bypassing environmental protections, including the 'Endangered Species Act'. The entire ecosystem, wolves, bears, and endangered species could be wiped out just to make timber companies richer. This isn't about helping everyday Americans, this is about helping corporate logging companies.

In the process, we lose clean water, clean air and wildlife habitats. This destruction of our forests harms the environment. Trees are a necessary component for removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, and cutting trees down to this extent will speed up global warming. Destroying our national forests for a quick cash-grab is reckless and shortsighted. Trump is willing to sacrifice millions of acres of protected land for cheaper lumber.
 
Trees are a necessary component for removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, and cutting trees down to this extent will speed up global warming.

As far as global warming, would it matter whether trees are cut down in US or in Canada?

I wonder where they can be replanted and grow faster by the way.

Trump is certainly going to go against science and significantly worsen global warming. I am not just not sure this is it.

P.S. Nice avatar - now I know what MAGA stands for!
 
Not sure how they can develop a successful reforestation program that quickly.......or maybe they just won't bother.
 
Trump's a sexual predator. Since women are getting wise to his act, he's now raping the land.
 
It's only softwood you import from Canada but this looks like they are opening up the forests to hardwood as well.
 
In the process, we lose clean water, clean air and wildlife habitats. This destruction of our forests harms the environment. Trees are a necessary component for removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, and cutting trees down to this extent will speed up global warming. Destroying our national forests for a quick cash-grab is reckless and shortsighted. Trump is willing to sacrifice millions of acres of protected land for cheaper lumber.

Keep swallowing the liberal knee jerk Kool Aid.

All cutting on federal lands requires reseeding and silt fencing.

Softwoods are a renewable crop and 94% of Canadian lumber is harvested off public land. Canada is doing just fine.

The National Forest Management Act of 1976 mandates that Federal lands fulfill multiple uses. (logging - recreation - grazing - etc.)

Many states even have stricter logging laws on top of the laws that the feds enforce for cutting within their borders.


BUT BUT BUT BUT..............................TRUMP! :ROFLMAO:
 
It's only softwood you import from Canada but this looks like they are opening up the forests to hardwood as well.
Why not first growth forests? I hear that's where the money is. 🙄
 
Trump's a sexual predator. Since women are getting wise to his act ...

Huh? Women are not getting wise about him at all. They love the grab-em-by-the-p%&sy-in-Chief.

Did you see how Roevember work out?

ss2.jpg

source
 
Last edited:
Huh? Women are not getting wise about him at all. Did you see how Roevember work out?
I mean hot women that he would actually be tempted to grope. Not the ones who vote for him.
 
I mean hot women that he would actually be tempted to grope. Not the ones who vote for him.
The ones that has groped he claims are ‘not his type’. That’s his defense. “I would have groped them, except they are not my type.’
 
Keep swallowing the liberal knee jerk Kool Aid.

All cutting on federal lands requires reseeding and silt fencing.

Softwoods are a renewable crop and 94% of Canadian lumber is harvested off public land. Canada is doing just fine.

The National Forest Management Act of 1976 mandates that Federal lands fulfill multiple uses. (logging - recreation - grazing - etc.)

Many states even have stricter logging laws on top of the laws that the feds enforce for cutting within their borders.


BUT BUT BUT BUT..............................TRUMP! :ROFLMAO:
You would find a way to excuse Trump if he ordered a nuclear strike on Los Angeles. You are part of the 'apologists gang'. Your energy is focused on making excuses or justifying any of his horrible actions.
 
You would find a way to excuse Trump if he ordered a nuclear strike on Los Angeles. You are part of the 'apologists gang'. Your energy is focused on making excuses or justifying any of his horrible actions.

Can't argue the facts Humblepi? :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:

The federal forests in the United States were set aside for (Recreation- Logging- Grazing)

Canada has been selling the United States lumber cut from 94% of public lands. Canada is doing just fine with their logging practices.

Canada has 9 % of all trees on the planet.

The USA has 8% of the trees on the planet.

Softwoods are a renewable crop.

Federal land laws require reseeding after harvesting....................... and protection of waterways during logging operations.

Care to argue these points out do you just prefer throwing out your petty insinuations every time you get called out for spreading lies and misinformation? ;)
 
Keep swallowing the liberal knee jerk Kool Aid.

All cutting on federal lands requires reseeding and silt fencing.

Softwoods are a renewable crop and 94% of Canadian lumber is harvested off public land. Canada is doing just fine.

The National Forest Management Act of 1976 mandates that Federal lands fulfill multiple uses. (logging - recreation - grazing - etc.)

Many states even have stricter logging laws on top of the laws that the feds enforce for cutting within their borders.


BUT BUT BUT BUT..............................TRUMP! :ROFLMAO:
Keep clear-cutting and destroying rivers.
 
You would find a way to excuse Trump if he ordered a nuclear strike on Los Angeles. You are part of the 'apologists gang'. Your energy is focused on making excuses or justifying any of his horrible actions.
He’s a Trumper who’s long denied his Trumpism.
 
Immediate Expansion of American Timber Production
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presiden...iate-expansion-of-american-timber-production/
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered:

Section 1. Purpose. The production of timber, lumber, paper, bioenergy, and other wood products (timber production) is critical to our Nation's well-being. Timber production is essential for crucial human activities like construction and energy production. Furthermore, as recent disasters demonstrate, forest management and wildfire risk reduction projects can save American lives and communities.

The United States has an abundance of timber resources that are more than adequate to meet our domestic timber production needs, but heavy-handed Federal policies have prevented full utilization of these resources and made us reliant on foreign producers. Our inability to fully exploit our domestic timber supply has impeded the creation of jobs and prosperity, contributed to wildfire disasters, degraded fish and wildlife habitats, increased the cost of construction and energy, and threatened our economic security. These onerous Federal policies have forced our Nation to rely upon imported lumber, thus exporting jobs and prosperity and compromising our self-reliance. It is vital that we reverse these policies and increase domestic timber production to protect our national and economic security.

Sec. 2. Directives to the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture.

(a) Within 30 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture, through the Director of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the Chief of the United States Forest Service (USFS), respectively, shall each issue new or updated guidance regarding tools to facilitate increased timber production and sound forest management, reduce time to deliver timber, and decrease timber supply uncertainty, such as the Good Neighbor Authority described in 16 U.S.C. 2113a, stewardship contracting pursuant to 16 U.S.C. 6591c, and agreements or contracts with Indian tribes under the Tribal Forest Protection Act as contemplated by 25 U.S.C. 3115a
_________________________________________________________
Does everyone understand what this executive order means? It means that the US plans to deforest our National Parks to make up for the shortfall of lumber coming from Canada due to Trump's tariffs. It means that Trump just ordered swaths of our national forests to be cut down, 280 million acres, to be exact. All for cheaper lumber. This EO means bypassing environmental protections, including the 'Endangered Species Act'. The entire ecosystem, wolves, bears, and endangered species could be wiped out just to make timber companies richer. This isn't about helping everyday Americans, this is about helping corporate logging companies.

In the process, we lose clean water, clean air and wildlife habitats. This destruction of our forests harms the environment. Trees are a necessary component for removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, and cutting trees down to this extent will speed up global warming. Destroying our national forests for a quick cash-grab is reckless and shortsighted. Trump is willing to sacrifice millions of acres of protected land for cheaper lumber.

How did you arrive to the conclusion 280 million acres of timber will be deforested from this EO? It plainly says, "issue new or updated guidance regarding tools to facilitate increased timber production and sound forest management, reduce time to deliver timber, and decrease timber supply uncertainty".

Much of our timber goes to waste falling dead or standing dead which increases chance of fire and fuel for fires. If anything it will make our ecosystem more healthy and productive which benefits the wildlife within.
 
For those who just don't get it: Timber isn't corn. It isn't wheat. It doesn't grow back next year. it takes at least a couple of decades to replace some species and at least 7-8 years for others.

Over cutting our natural timber resources is very problematic. It not only can lead to shortages of timber but serious land management issues and things like mud slides and dust storms that create other problems.

COMMON SENSE folks. It is imperative we reclaim the use of our frontal lobes. They aren't there just to take up space between your ears.
 
Keep clear-cutting and destroying rivers.

How did you arrive to the conclusion 280 million acres of timber will be deforested from this EO? It plainly says, "issue new or updated guidance regarding tools to facilitate increased timber production and sound forest management, reduce time to deliver timber, and decrease timber supply uncertainty".

Much of our timber goes to waste falling dead or standing dead which increases chance of fire and fuel for fires. If anything it will make our ecosystem more healthy and productive which benefits the wildlife within.

Liberal knee jerk reactions are all they have.

Canada and the US have some of the best logging practices on the planet.

Canada's provincial logging has had to put up with a lot liberal tree hugging nutjobs for a lot of years.............. and they haven't polluted themselves out of existence either.
 
As far as global warming, would it matter whether trees are cut down in US or in Canada?

I wonder where they can be replanted and grow faster by the way.

Trump is certainly going to go against science and significantly worsen global warming. I am not just not sure this is it.

P.S. Nice avatar - now I know what MAGA stands for!
I wholeheartedly agree that deforestation contributes to global warming, no matter which country is doing the logging. This concern was raised in the '90s after studies of the depletion of the Amazon rain forests and the effects of global warming were revealed. Canada’s 348 million hectares of forest lands represent about 9% of the world’s forest cover, but account for only 0.3% of global deforestation.

Canada is a world leader in sustainable forest management. Deforestation only occurs when forests are permanently removed, so the land can be used for something else. All areas harvested on public land must be reforested, either by replanting or through natural regeneration. Canada has some of the most rigorous laws in the world for protecting forests and ensuring sustainable forest management, and have been able to consistently reduce deforestation over the past 20 years. Their deforestation rate is among the lowest in the world.

Additionally, a significant majority (94%) of the province's commercially managed forests have received certification from either the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) or the Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI), which are considered the leading environmental certification bodies in Canada for forestry practices. Canada is a world leader in sustainable forest management.

Is the United States committed to focusing on reforesting of acres where lumber will be cut in our national parks? As it is in Canada, lumbering is primarily a private industry, but the majority of the forest land where timber is harvested is publicly owned, like our national parks. Will there be any oversight of the private lumber companies who will be given this sweet contract to deforest our national parks? Will that oversight be non-political? That's the big question.
 
Slashing our incredible gifts saved by Lincoln and T. Roosevelt is what you would expect from the party of Trump.

Making demons out of National Park employees is about as disgusting as it gets in a free nation.
 
How did you arrive to the conclusion 280 million acres of timber will be deforested from this EO? It plainly says, "issue new or updated guidance regarding tools to facilitate increased timber production and sound forest management, reduce time to deliver timber, and decrease timber supply uncertainty".

Much of our timber goes to waste falling dead or standing dead which increases chance of fire and fuel for fires. If anything it will make our ecosystem more healthy and productive which benefits the wildlife within.
I didn't claim that 280 million acres will be deforested, only that the areas of our national parks are comprised of 280 acres of trees, all of which is subject to be taken for lumber in the future. There are no lines drawn where it ends.
 
Over cutting our natural timber resources is very problematic.

Yeah.....we found that out 100 years ago. Obvious much?

Of course logging can be problematic if laws are not followed.


The US is currently growing more trees than it cuts down.

The nutjobs are pretending that the US is going to be clear cut out of existence.

Logging also contributes to regenerating the forests when managed properly.
 
Back
Top Bottom