• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

I'm also an art critic. (Just like everybody else.)

Loulit01

RESIST
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 30, 2021
Messages
30,888
Reaction score
48,643
Location
Hiding from ICE
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal

First Impression: Nice ass.

Upon Further Reflection: I should have been an artist. They have an inexhaustible fount of ideas that convince women to take off their clothes.

I will be in Manhattan December 8th for the 45th annual John Lennon tribute at Strawberry Fields. I plan to train in early in the morning and spend a few hours at the Met, coinciding with the Man Ray exhibit. I'm looking forward to seeing this photograph I find so intriguing. While not a big fan of Man Ray, I'm open to taking another look where a collection of his work will be displayed to good advantage. I could be wrong about him. I've been wrong before, I've been told.

The model is Alice Prin, known as "Kiki de Montparnasse."
A multi-talented young lady, Kiki was a well known chanteuse. By placing the f-holes in her back, he silences and objectifies her. While the violin can produce transcendent music, in the wrong hands and it can be a shrieking, discordant victim of abuse. So what is Man Ray saying about his lover Kiki? Does the the picture reflect how he sometimes sees her? Or is he protesting the way societies relegate women, directly and indirectly, as less then? Less then men. Less then citizens? Less then serious artists? He has hollowed her out.

Damned if I know. I'm just a semi-educated immigrant watching my back for ICE. I do know it's hard to take my eyes from Kiki's provocative obverse. And it makes me think. If making me people think is resoundingly inspired purpose for an art work, and I think it is, then it's a great a piece.

And there you have it: My considered opinion, just like almost everyone else's, is that the work is good.

You're welcome.
 
"Critics are like eunuchs in a harem; they know how it's done, they've seen it done every day, but they're unable to do it themselves."
Brendan Behan (Irish dramatist, 1923-64)
 
"Critics are like eunuchs in a harem; they know how it's done, they've seen it done every day, but they're unable to do it themselves."
Brendan Behan (Irish dramatist, 1923-64)
Writers mock Critics

Film at 11.
 
No need to facepalm. To each their own.

I appreciate art. And love a 'perfect moment' photo. Just doesn't speak to me.

I am more into painted in a medium with talent I couldn't dream of touching. As long as it doesn't look like some abstract art an elephant slung on some canvas. Though it should go for more than some 'art' I've seen. Because an elephant did it.

Years ago did work for a couple where she was a family issue lawyer, and he was an 'artist'.
The studio room? Paint slopped all over large sheets of thick paper(4x5'?)

Can I get some of that blotter from whoever you got it from?
 
Back
Top Bottom