You failed to answer the question. I am trying to understand what you are claiming is voter suppression. So once again, cite what suppression technique he is defending.
Sent from my Z982 using Tapatalk
Here is my question that remains unanswered from post #8:
In which district should these newborns be registered and what would be the procedure for when they move?
It was your idea, at least make a little effort to defend it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That's just plain ridiculous. Voters can only legally vote in their local and people move around all the time. You can't let a person from one state vote in a different state clear across the country unless they register to vote in their new location. You're saying that as long as they are born and not died that they should remain registered everywhere forever. If you have to re-register every time you move, then it would be kind of useless to just register everyone at birth.
Millions of illegals are registered to vote in the US today, and their names cannot be removed from voting rolls as long as democrats fight to keep them there. Here is an article from cases in North Carolina:
Illegal immigrants who exploited Motor Voter to register in North Carolina still on rolls
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/sep/3/illegal-immigrants-use-motor-voter-get-rolls-cant-/
Mr. Fullerton, who is still a citizen of Grenada, isa one of 19 North Carolinians the federal government indicted last month on charges of illegal voting. Yet even now his name remains on the state's rolls in Wake County, and local officials say there's not much then can do about it.
"At this time I've not been made aware of any formal source to remove anybody," said Gary Sims, elections board director in Wake, where five of the 19, including Mr. Fullerton, were registered. ...
Yet the indictments, which got only cursory attention nationally, do offer unprecedented insight into the contours of illegal voting in the U.S.
Can voter fraud be stopped? Not if crooked politicians and elections officials resist any effort to look into or put a stop to illegal voting.
Given that I am not Republican, and have voted Republican, Democrat, Green and Libertarian throughout the years, you are obviously clueless and biased. That all aside, the GOP is not a technique but a party. So not let's try it again without the ad hoc, strawman and red herring. What technique is being touted?the same one that you are : the Republican party. enjoy that, and i'll enjoy voting against you for the rest of my life.
i don't agree. everyone should be registered to vote at birth, and only removed from the rolls when a death certificate is issued. tracking where someone lives is easy, as i have illustrated with my own case. people trying to vote in two places is exceptionally rare, and generally involves getting caught. if you don't believe me, feel free to give it a shot, but don't claim that you weren't warned when it bites you in the ass.
Millions of illegals are registered to vote in the US today, and their names cannot be removed from voting rolls as long as democrats fight to keep them there. Here is an article from cases in North Carolina:
Illegal immigrants who exploited Motor Voter to register in North Carolina still on rolls
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/sep/3/illegal-immigrants-use-motor-voter-get-rolls-cant-/
Mr. Fullerton, who is still a citizen of Grenada, isa one of 19 North Carolinians the federal government indicted last month on charges of illegal voting. Yet even now his name remains on the state's rolls in Wake County, and local officials say there's not much then can do about it.
"At this time I've not been made aware of any formal source to remove anybody," said Gary Sims, elections board director in Wake, where five of the 19, including Mr. Fullerton, were registered. ...
Yet the indictments, which got only cursory attention nationally, do offer unprecedented insight into the contours of illegal voting in the U.S.
Can voter fraud be stopped? Not if crooked politicians and elections officials resist any effort to look into or put a stop to illegal voting.
Given that I am not Republican, and have voted Republican, Democrat, Green and Libertarian throughout the years, you are obviously clueless and biased. That all aside, the GOP is not a technique but a party. So not let's try it again without the ad hoc, strawman and red herring. What technique is being touted?
Sent from my Z982 using Tapatalk
I won't bother to ask what it is again. Just cite the post number. Because you have not made any indication of what happens when a person moves.already addressed.
Well, the truth is, I have a much better chance of successfully voting in two different states than you do of having everyone registered to vote at birth. That just ain't gonna happin.
I won't bother to ask what it is again. Just cite the post number. Because you have not made any indication of what happens when a person moves.
Sent from my Z982 using Tapatalk
So you are saying that when I am born (making an example) then I am registered to vote on each and every district across the country? So then how do you stop a person from voting only once but in a different district from where he lives.i don't agree. everyone should be registered to vote at birth, and only removed from the rolls when a death certificate is issued. tracking where someone lives is easy, as i have illustrated with my own case. people trying to vote in two places is exceptionally rare, and generally involves getting caught. if you don't believe me, feel free to give it a shot, but don't claim that you weren't warned when it bites you in the ass.
I won't bother to ask what it is again. Just cite the post number. Because you have not made any indication of what happens when a person moves.
Sent from my Z982 using Tapatalk
Those agencies don't track a person's location. You have to update that information, either yourself, or through other agents, such as when you update your tax records, or from an employer filing your current address for paying SS/Medicare.how do you know? have you attempted it?
it's odd that close to one hundred percent of people born here are successfully enrolled in Social Security and Medicare at birth. perhaps those in charge of voting registration can contact those agencies to get some tips!
Nothing here answers the questions asked. Now I have tried making an example in another post about how the registration would work in your idea. So that can be answered from that one. You still have not said what it was that was done to try and suppression your vote when you were in the apartment.
how do you know? have you attempted it?
it's odd that close to one hundred percent of people born here are successfully enrolled in Social Security and Medicare at birth. perhaps those in charge of voting registration can contact those agencies to get some tips!
So you are saying that when I am born (making an example) then I am registered to vote on each and every district across the country? So then how do you stop a person from voting only once but in a different district from where he lives.
And you still have not actually address how the government knows where you live. In fact, your example illustrates the complete opposite. If they knew where you were living then there would have been no need for the letters to ensure you were not still register at the old address. And you still have not addressed how ensuring that you are trying to register in two districts is suppressing your vote.
Sent from my Z982 using Tapatalk
As I said, the chance of us being registered to vote at birth is merely a fantasy in your head. By the way, I'm not enrolled in SS or Medicare. I'm getting close to retirement age now, but they're not going to give me anything until I "enroll" first.
i'm saying that the government knows where you live. there is no reason to remove you from the rolls until you die. if you try to vote twice, you will be caught and imprisoned.
Republicans (and "not quite Republicans") support voter purges.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/11/...ourt-upholds-ohios-purge-of-voting-rolls.html
No one gets purged unless they haven't voted in many, many elections. If they haven't voted in that many elections then they aren't going to vote anyway, for whatever reason. I know many people who have no intention of ever voting because they believe that both parties are just different sides of the same corrupt coin and voting for someone else is just a waste of time and space.
i'm saying that the government knows where you live.
if you try to vote twice, you will be caught and imprisoned.
Republicans (and "not quite Republicans") support voter purges.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/11/...ourt-upholds-ohios-purge-of-voting-rolls.html
You are still avoiding the questions asked.
The government only knows this if you update that information. As I pointed out if they knew where you were, they would not have needed to send out the letter to make sure you weren't still claiming the old address.
Which doesn't answer the question of a person voting only once in a district they do not reside.
Yes, you keep saying this without showing any techniques by which they do this. How were they trying to suppress your vote when you were in the apt?
Sent from my Z982 using Tapatalk
that's odd. how have you managed to work in the states for your entire career without a Social Security number? payroll taxes have not been withheld from your salary?
Quite the leap. NC apparently at some point prosecuted 19 people for being non-citizens and voting, which is evidence of MILLIONS!!!
And of course the story recommends that because at some point 19 non-citizens cast at least one vote, to make it much harder to register by ending registration at DMVs.
Millions and millions. You sound like the Carl Sagan of BS.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?