- Joined
- Oct 20, 2009
- Messages
- 28,431
- Reaction score
- 16,990
- Location
- Sasnakra
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
See, this is what I'm talking about. They're men, it's that simple. I can understand this talk from some right wing religious blowhard, but from someone who I've always considered reasonable and pro-LGBT, it's much more frustrating.
"Menstruation is not gender exclusive" Physiology be damned.
Mental gender and your physical sex either work in unison or separately.
Transgenders are transgenders. They are physically one thing and mentally identify as another. Their physical and mental work separately.
You're trying to claim their physical and mental work together? That contradicts the entire reason why they're transgender to begin with.
The mind isn't having the period flow. The body is. Separate.
:shrug: You're over-complicating this and turning it into something it's not.
Now if physical men started bleeding from their penises then we can seriously address this topic. But as long as someone has the physical characteristics of a female then they're trans with a period.
Of all the stupid ****ing conversations to even goddamn have. Next up: pregnancy is no longer gender exclusive. :roll:
Mental gender and your physical sex either work in unison or separately.
Transgenders are transgenders. They are physically one thing and mentally identify as another. Their physical and mental work separately.
You're trying to claim their physical and mental work together? That contradicts the entire reason why they're transgender to begin with.
The mind isn't having the period flow. The body is. Separate.
:shrug: You're over-complicating this and turning it into something it's not.
Now if physical men started bleeding from their penises then we can seriously address this topic. But as long as someone has the physical characteristics of a female then they're trans with a period.
Of all the stupid ****ing conversations to even goddamn have. Next up: pregnancy is no longer gender exclusive. :roll:
Ugh, that's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that they're men, so yeah, even though they may have a vagina, it's still a man's body. Because they are men. I'm not over complicating anything, it's pretty easy to grasp, actually.
Nonsense. They have a female body, but their brain tels them they are men.Ugh, that's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that they're men, so yeah, even though they may have a vagina, it's still a man's body. Because they are men. I'm not over complicating anything, it's pretty easy to grasp, actually.
Nonsense. They have a female body, but their brain tels them they are men.
Ugh, that's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that they're men, so yeah, even though they may have a vagina, it's still a man's body. Because they are men. I'm not over complicating anything, it's pretty easy to grasp, actually.
The brain is an organ in the body.
Oh dear.
Absolutely amazing. Is it not?
I guess if they continue with such ridiculous arguments, most people will clearly see the idiocy of it all.
A brain is neither male nor female. Brains are intersex. Characteristics of it overlap between the sexes.
No one can look at a brain and say with certainty that this one is male and that one is female. They can look at bones though, 400 years from now even, and know which are male or female. And, as much as a male or female says they are the opposite sex "for realz," the bones 400 years from now will prove they were wrong.
That's not what those who study the brain believe.
In the mid-19th century, researchers claimed they could tell the sex of an individual just by looking at their disembodied brain. But a new study finds that human brains do not fit neatly into “male” and “female” categories. . . .
The majority of the brains were a mosaic of male and female structures, the team reports online today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Depending on whether the researchers looked at gray matter, white matter, or the diffusion tensor imaging data, between 23% and 53% of brains contained a mix of regions that fell on the male-end and female-end of the spectrum. Very few of the brains—between 0% and 8%—contained all male or all female structures. “There is no one type of male brain or female brain,” Joel says.
lol 'periods are not gender exclusive' . . . ?? If they're trans then, logic dictates, they're really a genetic female. Thus yes - periods are gender exclusive. Where are these supposed males bleeding from? Their dicks?
I'm open minded and I support trans people. I don't think it's wrong to point out that "men can have periods too" is inaccurate if the said man still has female anatomy. It's like trans people who say, "Look, a man who got pregnant and had a baby!"... even though he still has a fully functional uterus.
I know gender and sex aren't the same thing. It still strikes me as disingenuous and not believable.
And please... anti-trans people do not 'thank' my post. I'm not on your side and we have nothing in common. This is more of my personal beef.
I'm open minded and I support trans people. I don't think it's wrong to point out that "men can have periods too" is inaccurate if the said man still has female anatomy. It's like trans people who say, "Look, a man who got pregnant and had a baby!"... even though he still has a fully functional uterus.
I know gender and sex aren't the same thing. It still strikes me as disingenuous and not believable.
And please... anti-trans people do not 'thank' my post. I'm not on your side and we have nothing in common. This is more of my personal beef.
This is just as stupid as the SJW garbage I find on Tumblr. Arguing over stupid stuff like the "Male Gaze" or whatever.
Every time I hear them speak I feel as though I'm bleeding from my ears. #STFUpleaseLGBT
It's not stupid. It's just realizing, "Oh, other people exist."
Common human decency, IMO.
People are not necessarily anti-trans when they take the position that men with male anatomy are not women and vice versa. It's just the PC-garbage fundamentalists that try to paint it that way.
Then you are implicitly asserting that those who lack some anatomical structure like a uterus are not "real" women etc.
Gender is a social construct, and those who are socially male are real, true males. Many people do not have unanimous agreement in terms of every possible sex characteristic.
That so many of the movement transgenders can't just accept their differences, face the fact that they are not normal men and women, by insisting that they be force-fit into a male-female binary even though that is totally impossible. A transgender will never be the sex opposite of the biological sex they were when born. It's impossible for a man to become a woman and vice versa. All they can ever be is trans. They need to face that fact and leave the rest of us alone.
Exactly. I don't mind them being crazy, I just object to the way that they expect us to follow them into crazyland.
Calling them PC-garbage fundamentalists is just a way of insulting people who are in possession of the scientific, psychological and medical facts.
If someone is trans they are trans, doesn't matter what they look like or what you feel they are like. I'm not even talking about that. Just trying to reconcile what I perceive to be a certain level of dishonesty when people say a man (with a uterus because he used to be a she) got pregnant for the first time... when the authors of such articles know full well that that's not what people are expecting.
I'm trans positive. I'll call you whatever you want to be called. But if you're having a baby it's because you're still anatomically female. It's not accurate to say otherwise.
I saw an article a while back about a man who had a kid, and it was such a bait article. How exciting would it be if an anatomical male actually could have a child? But of course it was a trans person.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?