• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

If you cannot answer yes to these two questions, then you should not vote for Trump

rjay said:
You raise a point. I had forgotten about the Epstein angle

I would be willing to exclude voting for either Trump or Clinton based on Question 1, just for their affiliation, and many flights, on the Epstein planes.

We don't know if either of them engaged in any physical touching of girls associated with Epstein. If they did, that would automatically fall in the non-consensual touching category, in my book.
Click to expand...
 
rational anarchist said:
Click to expand...

I am sure we are ALL waiting for Mel to do so. Just like we have been waiting for the Pillow Guy to finally release ALL the evidence he has collected concerning voter fraud.
 
SNOWFLAKE said:
I am sure we are ALL waiting for Mel to do so. Just like we have been waiting for the Pillow Guy to finally release ALL the evidence he has collected concerning voter fraud.
Click to expand...
Is he going to name the antisemitism too?
rational anarchist said:
Click to expand...


Are you trying to find ways to reduce your credibility?

Maybe your best bet would be to respond to other threads, you were coming off as sane, but ill informed, at first. Now you are starting to stray into the area where the 'sane' bit can be ruled out.

This assumes I am responding to the r.a. post, not the fellow snowflakes
 
anyone notice how Trump's brain really started going downhill once p-diddy got arrested
 
rational anarchist said:
except when trump found out about epstein he banned him from his resorts and stopped hanging around him and clinton kept visiting the island,,

and trump says he will release the client list and dems have worked night and day concealing it,,
Click to expand...
I am not sure about your first point "except when trump found out about epstein he banned him from his resorts and stopped hanging around him"

From what I understand is Trump felt burned by Epstein on a real estate deal and that ended the relationship. Maybe this happened about the same time 'trump found out about epstein', I don't know. I only know that if Trump is the only source for something that makes Trump look better than he would look otherwise than caution should be used before we accept the Trump story blindly.

We all have to agree that when it comes to trustworthy sources, Trump is not the top source of all things Trump.
 
rational anarchist said:
what makes you think I am angry??

I just explained to you how I work,,

maybe you shouldnt speak about things you dont know about,,
or at least not get triggered like this when you get corrected,,
Click to expand...
Looks to me like you are the snowflake that got triggered.

Grow up.
 
rational anarchist said:
well she is about the only person that knows all the people on the epstien client list since her boss was murdered,,

she needs all the well wishs she can get,,

do you have any idea why we never hear anyone on the left talking about this topic or sex slavery at the southern border??
Click to expand...
I guess you don't read the news that often...it is a topic of discussion among everybody. But also, you need to address the fact that despite a bi-partisan effort to create a law, while not perfect, would have provided a foundation for future legislation in dealing with illegal immigration but was killed by the MAGA-mites after Trump ordered it to be killed so he could have a platform to talk about on his campaign.

Or did I "cross you" and you are going to come at me because "laws mean nothing" if that is true?

Snicker....
 
rational anarchist said:
to be honest with both of us I am voting for trump mostly because of democrats,,

I didnt vote for him in 16 or 20,,

but the dems have gone so radical I have no other choice,,

and the answer to both your questions is yes I would,,
Click to expand...

You think the Dems are the radical ones?

Trump tried to overturn an election and has threatened to use the army on US citizens. I'd argue those are far more radical than anything the Dems have said or done.
 
rjay said:
I woudn't have a problem adding Clinton, both Bushes, Reagan, Ford, or Carter to the list.

Clinton dveloped a reputation for womanizing, true. He did develop relationships with women while married. He did not assault women, or do anything non-consensual.

I don't know about you, but the consensual thing is kind of a big deal to me.
Click to expand...
Your history on Clinton is flawed. He raped a woman in Arkansas when he was the Governor. Was swept under the rug.
 
Anthony60 said:
LOL! And this is how you decide who to vote for? I would not want any of those Democrats involved at all, for sure.
Click to expand...
Damn dude. Are you saying you let your daughter stay in his house?
 
Anthony60 said:
Where do you see that? Are you saying you would let your daughter stay with a stranger? Damn is right.
Click to expand...
Would you let your daughter stay at Trump's house?
 
Anthony60 said:
When she was younger, I let her stay at a different billionaires house, many times actually.
Click to expand...
That's not Trump (who has been accused by many women of raping them) house. Trump has even been convicted.

Was your billionaire a rapist? Hint: You best say "No".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom