If Trump is…

[soap box]

when people die it usually transcends "protest." **** man, I was arrested in the 60's for "protesting" now its a ****ing excuse.

When police are injured they usually at least call it a riot. In this instance, with the intent clearly stated of unseating the elected government the word 'rebellion' could be used without challenge. Good thing they stashed their guns or there would be a few acres of graves.

Calling it a protest is propaganda. Not even a nice try

So now I know you have no problem with lies.

Thank you.

I suspect you may want to forward this post to your favorite member here among us.

I seek one honest MAGA. I am 75. I'm running out of time.

oh no, didn't you know,

if you can reason with a trump voter,




they're re not a trump voter

 

[Jay59]

But you didn't post any facts.

Sure I did.

I posted that the first impeachment does not state an actual criminal act of any kind. I posted that both of the impeachments were thrown out on the reading of the charges. I posted that the reason was failure to state a cause of action. Those are all facts.

You didn't post any facts.

You don't recognize a fact when it slaps you.

when people die it usually transcends "protest." **** man, I was arrested in the 60's for "protesting" now its a ****ing excuse. When police are injured they usually at least call it a riot.

Not when the police cause the death.

That said, I have no problem with calling it a riot.

In this instance, with the intent clearly stated of unseating the elected government the word 'rebellion' could be used without challenge.

This does not follow any more than hanging an effigy is attempted murder.

They were trying to disrupt a ceremony not overthrow the government.

Good thing they stashed their guns or there would be a few acres of graves.

This is another reason why calling it a rebellion makes no sense.

Calling it a protest is propaganda. Not even a nice try

How so? We call the burning of a police building in Minneapolis a protest.

The summer of 2020 was much more of a rebellion than 6 January, complete with weapons, death, and property damage.

I seek one honest MAGA. I am 75. I'm running out of time.

I am not that person.

If I ever become MAGA (doubtful), I will let you know.

 

[soap box]

Sure I did.

I posted that the first impeachment does not state an actual criminal act of any kind.

Everything I asked or posted to you was about the second. Who's responsible for the riot?

edit 2- the constitution says high crimes and misdemeanors.
It doesn't require a citation.

I posted that both of the impeachments were thrown out on the reading of the charges.

That is a meaningless claim . What are you talking about?

I posted that the reason was failure to state a cause of action. Those are all facts.

That's your interpretation. An interpretation is not a fact by definition. Besides, you never addressed anything the senators said. At all. Not a word. Just your opinion and interpretation.
And 70 Senators do not agree with you. This is the point because you weren't voting at the Senate trial.
If you read their words and you still say there was no cause of action I would know you were not telling the truth. So I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and conclude that you were too stubborn to read and that explains why you have posted this way.

Your stubbornness alone disqualifies , cancels your replies and I have no interest in your uninformed opinions.

You may have the last word in your vain vain hope that someone will stumble over your piss poor defense of the trump.

edit - you can reply all you want and I don't think I'll read it.

 

[Jay59]

That is a meaningless claim . What are you talking about?

It's not a claim. It's a fact.

In neither Senate trial were any witnesses called. Both were thrown out before things progressed that far.

you can reply all you want and I don't think I'll read it.

You are not the only one who can't deal with disagreement.

Facts are cold and hard. In this case, they do not agree with your position.