• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

If Liberals Are More Intelligent Than Conservatives, Why Are Liberals So Stupid?

So if I have sex with a male I'm a woman this is news to me. It was all of this complicated part of my life where I was trying to accept the fact that I was homosexual.

It may not be complicated but it seems farcical. Homosexual men have sex with men so they're women?
Yes, because only cis genders and heterosexuals exist in the world.
All others are faking.
 
Yeah trans women are men trans men are women.

I would say the definition that applies to 100% of women is adult human female it exclusively applies to women because that's what they are.
and gay men are transwoman but want to be kept in closet.

But that is why the terms cis and trans do exist. So you are 1/2 correct.

A trans female is a trans female. Neither male nor female, 100%. Whatever 100% is. No one knows what 100% male or female entails.
A lady with a beard, that can't give birth. 100% female??
 
Last edited:
LMAO :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:

A key takeaway

"Liberals lack common sense".

============================================


I understand you more now, you’re a retiree with lots of free to scour the bowels of the Internet for trash that feeds your biases, hate and prejudices.
 
I can’t even remember who you are, I responded to the post.

Sure, check your history. Do you ever add to a conversation or just throw out a red herring and call people MAGA?
 
Sure, check your history. Do you ever add to a conversation or just throw out a red herring and call people MAGA?
There's no such thing as centrists. Sorry?
 
It's so funny that you keep mentioning that because all I'm doing is addressing your argument and all your doing is revealing how it makes you feel.
I have made no mention of feelings. Why do you lie so much?
Anywho your claims about how people can identify dont seem to have any supporting evidence beyond your frail say so.
People can identify however they want. Reality isn’t affected by it though. A man can call himself a woman, but he remains a man.
 
I understand you more now, you’re a retiree with lots of free to scour the bowels of the Internet for trash that feeds your biases, hate and prejudices.
ROFLMAO but also: you just described our sitting president. 😢
 
I suspected VySKy was in the closet based on his obsession and fixation on all things, drag queen, transgender and gay.
I do have a theory that most conservative men would like to experiment sexually or have and the guilt, self-loathing, etc spirals outward. IT’s a shame this country is still a relic when it comes to sexuality. So many repressed angry people living quiet angry lives. “Quiet desperation”.
 
I do have a theory that most conservative men would like to experiment sexually or have and the guilt, self-loathing, etc spirals outward. IT’s a shame this country is still a relic when it comes to sexuality. So many repressed angry people living quiet angry lives. “Quiet desperation”.
Did you see this?
These Republican shit bags are grabbing each other’s asses while they’re passing that bill

 
Did you see this?
These Republican shit bags are grabbing each other’s asses while they’re passing that bill


🤣 🤣 🤣 It is the least important thing but one really weird thread from this period is Republican men and women telling use what a “high agency male” should be and apparently it’s a make up wearing cuckold to an ancient make up wearing goofball in lifts.
 
Bizarre, and you're so close.

"The left" have not traditionally been the intellectuals. That used to be the territory of conservatives. There are no more conservative intellectuals. George Will left the GOP when Trump entered it.

It's not that "the left" is intellectually superior. It's that the right has abandoned intellectualism altogether.
Well the "intellectual "supremacists loathe mainstream society, and the conservatives are mainstream society.
Trump seems to be easily out maneuvering the self proclaimed "intellectuals".
George Will should appreciate Trump's major achievements on the conservative issues.
Trump is a government reformer, and he is upsetting the status quo.
 
Well the "intellectual "supremacists loathe mainstream society, and the conservatives are mainstream society.
I said you were so close. This is further away, and still bizarre.

Trump seems to be easily out maneuvering the self proclaimed "intellectuals".
OIP.hYzYvFGuCeKmM2YrLZtmhQHaEK


George Will should appreciate Trump's major achievements on the conservative issues.
Trump isn't conservative. That's why Will left the GOP. Trump is surely maneuvering some people.

Trump is a government reformer, and he is upsetting the status quo.
Trump is fascist. Only fools are blind to this.

Anyway, conservatives used to be the intellectuals. Liberals were the emotionalists. Liberals are still emotional, but conservatives have abandoned intellectualism for blind obedience to a cult leader. That's the point.
 
I said you were so close. This is further away, and still bizarre.


OIP.hYzYvFGuCeKmM2YrLZtmhQHaEK



Trump isn't conservative. That's why Will left the GOP. Trump is surely maneuvering some people.


Trump is fascist. Only fools are blind to this.

Anyway, conservatives used to be the intellectuals. Liberals were the emotionalists. Liberals are still emotional, but conservatives have abandoned intellectualism for blind obedience to a cult leader. That's the point.
Trump seems to be enraging the pseudo intellectuals.
Yes, Trump is not a conservative, or a fascist.
He is a reformer.
 
Gays don't need public funds, or raise your insurance premiums, to enjoy one another's company. I think that where money is involved a large dose of skepticism really is bound to follow.
Please explain this post. Higher insurance premiums? Public funds?
 
Back
Top Bottom