• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

If Liberals Are More Intelligent Than Conservatives, Why Are Liberals So Stupid?

So you didn't read it either. I quoted the part referencing the science, as a way to broaden the discussion from @rahl 's stubbornly blinkered nay-saying. That's all. I mistakenly took him for someone interested in a real conversation.

Now, if you think the scientific references are incorrect, have at it. Would love to see other references saying something different. I'm here to listen, debate and learn, and I expect the same of others.
Ok, I read it. There was no science presented. Do you understand this.
 
Ok, I read it. There was no science presented. Do you understand this.
I referenced it in the three paragraphs I quoted. There are embedded links to the experiments conducted and quotes by other researchers.
 
I’m sorry you reject science and reality. Neither give a shit though. They remain objective reality all the same. A man can’t become a woman. Just like a man can’t become a dolphin.
What do you think about intersex people or hermaphrodites? What are they in your nomenclature.
 
LMAO :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:

A key takeaway

"Liberals lack common sense".

============================================


The Left Wingers only believe that they are intellectually superior.
But are they?
One thing is for sure, they are supremacists.
The Nazis also believed that they were superior to other Europeans, but they were not.
 
If these organizations says humans could breath water or fly they would be discredited
why is it frail people like you can't accept that fact?
I didn't submit to big names. Even institutions can be liars.
No I dont. What another hilarious bit of frail fantasy you have to tell yourself. You can call people whatever you want. The question is whether you're going to be proud or frail about why you're calling people whatever you choose to call them. You want to pretend you're adhering to science but here are three reputable scientific organizations who you're at odds with and so far I haven't seen you present one that agrees with you.
They aren't reputable if they pretend trans women are actually women.
And you can identify as being on the side of science but where's the evidence of that?
I know what a woman is and identity isn't involved.
 
There's no scientific evidence that says a woman that identifies as a man is a man. It's false scientifically speaking.

No “women identify as men”. Gender is an identity. Women identify as women, men identify as men.

And science supports that, including hard sciences like neuroscience.
 
For you average person, I don't think there is any difference in intelligence between conservatives/liberals. However, at the highest level of education we do see that to skew liberal. And I do think this is significant and matters.

People choose to be liberal/conservative for many cultural and personal reasons. But the highly affluent level of society leans liberal and I do think intelligence plays a role.
 
What do you think about intersex people or hermaphrodites? What are they in your nomenclature.
They aren't trans and if he pretty resentful if I had swyers syndrome or Jacobs syndrome and was used as a justification for a man to identify as a woman.

Typically people with intersex conditions are either male or female.
 
They aren't trans and if he pretty resentful if I had swyers syndrome or Jacobs syndrome and was used as a justification for a man to identify as a woman.
Don't put words in my mouth. @rahl sees the world in unflinching binary terms, and I want to understand how the outliers fit into his outlook. He doesn't seem to handle nuance and complexity well.
Typically people with intersex conditions are either male or female.
There exist people with many variations of non-aligned "parts".

Chromosomal, hormonal, gonadal, anatomical differences are all different.
 
The Left Wingers only believe that they are intellectually superior.
But are they?
One thing is for sure, they are supremacists.
The Nazis also believed that they were superior to other Europeans, but they were not.
Bizarre, and you're so close.

"The left" have not traditionally been the intellectuals. That used to be the territory of conservatives. There are no more conservative intellectuals. George Will left the GOP when Trump entered it.

It's not that "the left" is intellectually superior. It's that the right has abandoned intellectualism altogether.
 
Don't put words in my mouth.
Sorry about that.
@rahl sees the world in unflinching binary terms, and I want to understand how the outliers fit into his outlook. He doesn't seem to handle nuance and complexity well.
Yeah there is a tiny sliver of grey area here and I understand
There exist people with many variations of non-aligned "parts".
Sure some people are born missing all sorts of things
Chromosomal, hormonal, gonadal, anatomical differences are all different.
True but if we are talking about male and female the structures that produce sperm or the structures that produce ova are the line. There can be flukes in anatomy and I'm genetics but it doesn't create a spectrum between male and female.
 
If these organizations says humans could breath water or fly they would be discredited
They aren't discredited though and they're saying this so what does that tell you? Not so good with the critical thinking, are you? 😂
I didn't submit to big names. Even institutions can be liars.
You didn't submit anything but your say so. Is this what we're all supposed to understand your argument to rest on? Your insistence?
They aren't reputable if they pretend trans women are actually women.
They aren't reputable to you, but they are to the scientific community at large in a way that you are not any can't demonstrate. What are we to make of that?
I know what a woman is and identity isn't involved.
You keep telling yourself that. It's that the frail do.
 
Ime, if Americans had an honest/intelligent voting system and they had the ability to register a 'NONE OF THE ABOVE' vote, or better yet, a 'negative vote' these stinking Republicrat shit puppet politicians would be righteously humiliated...'Both' :rolleyes: parties would be exposed as shit...
 
All you need to know is that conservatives take Tom Tuberville over Doug Jones. That says it all.
 
I referenced it in the three paragraphs I quoted. There are embedded links to the experiments conducted and quotes by other researchers.

Post #?

Are we even talking about the same article?

I speak to the ops post.
 
Ok, I read it. There was no science presented. Do you understand this.

I'm willing to accept the assertion that liberals are smarter than conservatives..

The science is in the observations. 😀
 
I wouldn't call true liberals stupid. But there a very few true liberals left.

Progressives and MAGAs are the ones who are damaging this country.
There’s no such thing as centrists. Just maga lite.
 
LMAO :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:

A key takeaway

"Liberals lack common sense".

============================================


"Why are liberals so stupid......"

Smelly bait. Nothing else.
 
Because trans-women are not real women. If they were, than why do we not call them women, instead of trans-women? Because they are not.
That's how you define woman? Not a trans?
How do you define a cis woman?
 
Back
Top Bottom