• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

If Liberals Are More Intelligent Than Conservatives, Why Are Liberals So Stupid?

In your mind, that certainly makes sense.
No, in reality.
And a point that liberal DEI staff hubristically missed is that you have a right to your own mind.

However, in other people's minds, things are different. For example, a man might be working as an actor, and be starring in a movie as the "voice of Lady the Golden Retriever". And there's another fellow working as the voice of the Chihuahua. And when (not if) the Chihuahua guy gets deported, somebody might wonder, well can't this other guy be the voice of the Chihuahua? But he can't, because obviously, he's the Golden Retriever. Like it or not, for some context it makes sense.
 
There is such a thing as the DSM and it explains to you what gender identity is.
Which has no basis in reality.

A man can’t become a woman any more than a man can become a chocolate Labrador
 
I know. Men who believe they are women fall under the criteria for delusional disorder.
Who cares. People who think they're patriotic Americans but support Trump have a delusional disorder.
I have and will continue pounding your ideology into the ground with reality.
Apparently you also have a delusional disorder.
 
Because there is no such thing.

Because I live in reality.

I’m not making an argument. I’m pointing out reality. A man can’t become a woman anymore than he can become a golden retriever.
It is actually is more complicated than that.

This is an interesting and informative article that traces the history and science of transgender research.

Until the 1870s, a person's gender/sex was defined only by their external genitalia. Then,

"As transgender medicine emerged as a field of study in the 1920s and 1930s, the gonadal view of sex reigned. Eugen Steinach, an Austrian scientist, conducted studies demonstrating that a guinea pig’s sex could be changed by removing its gonads and replacing them with the gonads of the opposite sex."

"Transgender advocates such as the German physician Magnus Hirschfeld realized that human sex functioned in a similar way to Steinach’s guinea pigs. If the hormonally induced characteristics many people consider “male” and “female” –such as facial hair, breast growth or the pitch of one’s voice – are largely determined by gonads, then a person can change their sex by changing gonads. Therefore, the most common surgeries for trans women at this time consisted of orchiectomies – the removal of testes."

"By the late 1970s, definitions of biological sex were so contested that even Janice Raymond, the 20th century’s most influential anti-transgender theorist, affirmed that scientists understood there to be at least six different types of sex: chromosomal, anatomical, gonadal, hormonal, legal and psychological."
 
It is actually is more complicated than that.
No it isn’t.
This is an interesting and informative article that traces the history and science of transgender research.
Science says a man can’t become a woman. Just like science says a man can’t become a Boston terrier.
Until the 1870s, a person's gender/sex was defined only by their external genitalia. Then,

"As transgender medicine emerged as a field of study in the 1920s and 1930s, the gonadal view of sex reigned. Eugen Steinach, an Austrian scientist, conducted studies demonstrating that a guinea pig’s sex could be changed by removing its gonads and replacing them with the gonads of the opposite sex."

"Transgender advocates such as the German physician Magnus Hirschfeld realized that human sex functioned in a similar way to Steinach’s guinea pigs. If the hormonally induced characteristics many people consider “male” and “female” –such as facial hair, breast growth or the pitch of one’s voice – are largely determined by gonads, then a person can change their sex by changing gonads. Therefore, the most common surgeries for trans women at this time consisted of orchiectomies – the removal of testes."
"By the late 1970s, definitions of biological sex were so contested that even Janice Raymond, the 20th century’s most influential anti-transgender theorist, affirmed that scientists understood there to be at least six different types of sex: chromosomal, anatomical, gonadal, hormonal, legal and psychological."
A man is an adult male. Always has been. A woman is an adult female. Always has been. It’s not possible for a man to become a woman. Just like it’s not possible for a man to become a Saint Bernard.
 
No it isn’t.

Science says a man can’t become a woman. Just like science says a man can’t become a Boston terrier.

A man is an adult male. Always has been. A woman is an adult female. Always has been. It’s not possible for a man to become a woman. Just like it’s not possible for a man to become a Saint Bernard.
Well, thank you for taking the time to actually read and think about the information in the article I posted. Yes, that's sarcasm. You insist that you know what "science says" but don't provide references or links. The science referenced in the article says differently from what you claim.
 
Well, thank you for taking the time to actually read and think about the information in the article I posted. Yes, that's sarcasm. You insist that you know what "science says" but don't provide references or links.
Biology is the reference.
The science referenced in the article says differently from what you claim.
No it doesn’t. A man can’t become a woman. Just like a man can’t become a Doberman.
 
Biology is the reference.

No it doesn’t. A man can’t become a woman. Just like a man can’t become a Doberman.
Still haven't bother to read the article I linked. Love the good faith your put into your arguments. (more sarcasm)

Your analogy is stupid, by the way, because we're not talking about interspecies transformations. A man can't become a dog, sure. But a male dog could possible become a female dog through gonad replacement. Same species, different sex.
 
Still haven't bother to read the article I linked.
I read it and refuted it.
Love the good faith your put into your arguments. (more sarcasm)
I’m not making an argument. I’m pointing out facts and reality.
Your analogy is stupid, by the way, because we're not talking about interspecies transformations.
I know. Both are equally impossible though.
A man can't become a dog, sure.
Nor can he become a woman.
But a male dog could possible become a female dog through gonad replacement.
No he can’t. Because his DNA makes him a male. Regardless of what cosmetic surgeries you give him.
Same species, different sex.
It’s not possible to change sexes. Just like it’s not possible to change species.

This is basic grade school level biology.
 
Still haven't bother to read the article I linked. Love the good faith your put into your arguments. (more sarcasm)

Your analogy is stupid, by the way, because we're not talking about interspecies transformations. A man can't become a dog, sure. But a male dog could possible become a female dog through gonad replacement. Same species, different sex.
The link is bias opinion. Why should anyone read it?

It is published to get hits from people who want to believe.
 
The link is bias opinion. Why should anyone read it?

It is published to get hits from people who want to believe.
So you didn't read it either. I quoted the part referencing the science, as a way to broaden the discussion from @rahl 's stubbornly blinkered nay-saying. That's all. I mistakenly took him for someone interested in a real conversation.

Now, if you think the scientific references are incorrect, have at it. Would love to see other references saying something different. I'm here to listen, debate and learn, and I expect the same of others.
 
So you didn't read it either. I quoted the part referencing the science, as a way to broaden the discussion from @rahl 's stubbornly blinkered nay-saying. That's all. I mistakenly took him for someone interested in a real conversation.

Now, if you think the scientific references are incorrect, have at it. Would love to see other references saying something different. I'm here to listen, debate and learn, and I expect the same of others.
I’m sorry you reject science and reality. Neither give a shit though. They remain objective reality all the same. A man can’t become a woman. Just like a man can’t become a dolphin.
 
Which has no basis in reality.
So you claim. Now do something other than repeat your claim to us. 😂
A man can’t become a woman any more than a man can become a chocolate Labrador
And now explain what this argument means in relation to our argument. No one is suggesting you can change your DNA or chromosomes. That's just you pretending.
 
It’s not possible to change sexes. Just like it’s not possible to change species.

This is basic grade school level biology.
Sigh.

So how do you explain the guinea pig experiment?
 
Sigh.

So how do you explain the guinea pig experiment?
A male guinea pig remains a male guinea pig no matter what cosmetic surgeries or hormones you give it. Just like a man remains a man no matter how many body parts he chops off or estrogen shots he takes.
 
You did but you're so frail about it you fear having to defend it. 😂
It’s so funny when you think you are insulting me.

Anywho, reality remains. A man can’t become a woman. Just like a man can’t become a black bear.
 
It’s so funny when you think you are insulting me.

Anywho, reality remains. A man can’t become a woman. Just like a man can’t become a black bear.
It's so funny that you keep mentioning that because all I'm doing is addressing your argument and all your doing is revealing how it makes you feel. Anywho your claims about how people can identify dont seem to have any supporting evidence beyond your frail say so.
 
A male guinea pig remains a male guinea pig no matter what cosmetic surgeries or hormones you give it. Just like a man remains a man no matter how many body parts he chops off or estrogen shots he takes
 
LMAO :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:

A key takeaway

"Liberals lack common sense".

============================================


it says it right there in your title. Liberals are more intelligent.

:ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
 
LMAO :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:

A key takeaway

"Liberals lack common sense".

============================================



Anyone who is part of a majority rules concern that allows a small minority to run that concern that massively impacts their lives lacks COMMON SENSE.

So, the tribal folks of BOTH sides who insist “owning” the other tribe is worth surrendering control to that minority because they are too busy fighting to recognize and support their own best interests are the dummies.

You going to be OK when the investment banker con men who are doing all that lovely stuff with divestment instruments and default swaps screw us all again. You know, the game where they sell you dog crap wrapped in gold leaf and then invest short against their own dog crap, betting against their own clients and what they sold them.

They are, you know. Although this time it’s not just mortgages. It’s also upside-down car loans, student loans and unsecured personal (credit card) debt and leveraged at a much higher rates than last time.

You guys are so f###ed.
 
A male guinea pig remains a male guinea pig no matter what cosmetic surgeries or hormones you give it. Just like a man remains a man no matter how many body parts he chops off or estrogen shots he takes.
Reading comprehension quiz: which definition of sex are you referencing in the above assertion? No peeks now.
 
Back
Top Bottom