- Joined
- Mar 25, 2010
- Messages
- 63,435
- Reaction score
- 35,206
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
Because you’re not paying for it yet
Why do we need to pay for it? Open one up.
Because you’re not paying for it yet
A few blocks down the road I used to live on was the Iqra school, a Muslim parochial school. They'd purely love for their people to get government vouchers. I wonder how the rightist conservatives will explain to their taxpayer's about that.The Talibornagains need to understand that they are gonna open a whole can of worms that they might not like.
![]()
If Republican leaders in Iowa give millions of dollars to private religious schools through a controversial voucher program, there’s a chance it’ll support a Satanic school as well. That’s what non-theist Joe Stutler told lawmakers on Tuesday during a hearing for House Study Bill 1, a piece of legislation that’s being called a “top priority” by the state’s GOP leadership.
Governor Kim Reynolds and her allies want to spend $341 million per year to pay for students to attend private (often religious) schools. Usually, the biggest complaints about voucher programs come from church/state separation supporters, who don’t want public money supporting religious education; special needs families, who say their kids may not be accepted or supported by private schools; and LGBTQ people, whose mere existence is a black mark for many Christians.
Knowing that lawmakers were well aware of those complaints and didn’t give a damn about any of them, Stutler took a different approach during yesterday’s public hearing about the bill. He told the legislators he supported the bill… and that he would be opening “Little Devils Academy” (tag line: “Bite The Apple”) if the bill passed in order to spread the Gospel of Satan to little kids.
i would have no issue with itA few blocks down the road I used to live on was the Iqra school, a Muslim parochial school. They'd purely love for their people to get government vouchers. I wonder how the rightist conservatives will explain to their taxpayer's about that.
No. The whole point of vouchers is to create alternatives to state education. Its called choice. Something you libs pretend to support.Yeah the whole point of vouchers is to get around the first amendment and get funding to religious schools. They think they are clever….
The really interesting part is if anyone would actually enroll………Man, do I love me some malicious compliance.
The alternatives are not always a good thing.No. The whole point of vouchers is to create alternatives to state education. Its called choice. Something you libs pretend to support.
The top performing public schools often outperform good private schools. I don’t have any problem with vouchers for kids in failing school districts. They can be a godsend for parents and kids in that case. However, if you are in a good school district and want your kids to go to a private school just the same, then it should be on your own dime, not the taxpayers.The ultimate goal is to educate our kids. The problem with the public schools is the focus is on the underachiever and keeping them in school so they can disrupt everyone's learning. If your kids have any brains whatsoever he's better off home schooled, attending private school, or the latest thing is advance placement through the community colleges. You have to look out for your own kids because no one else will.
He can threaten that. But I doubt he has the money to go through with it.
only if they get parents to sign their kids up for the classesAre you not familiar with the Satanic Temple? This is exactly the sort of thing they do. They already have an after-school program as well as a recovery program, this seems like a natural next step for them.
Besides, the whole point here is that taxpayers are going to be footing the bill.
Seriously? Do you actually know anything about Christian schools? There are no religious teachings. It's the same as public schools minus the trouble makers and the special needs kids. Oh, and parents pay for their kids education so they care about the results and are far more involved.I am fine with vouchers so long as they are only available to kids in failing school districts.
The problem with vouchers is they are often used by middle class families in good school districts so that taxpayers can fund their kids creationists education.
Also interesting if the school could be accredited and attract qualified teachers.The really interesting part is if anyone would actually enroll………
The Baptist K-8 near me most certainly did include religious teachings. Maybe it depends on the school.Seriously? Do you actually know anything about Christian schools? There are no religious teachings. It's the same as public schools minus the trouble makers and the special needs kids. Oh, and parents pay for their kids education so they care about the results and are far more involved.
That‘s pure bullshit.Seriously? Do you actually know anything about Christian schools? There are no religious teachings. It's the same as public schools minus the trouble makers and the special needs kids. Oh, and parents pay for their kids education so they care about the results and are far more involved.
Top performing private schools are the exception, not the norm.The top performing public schools often outperform good private schools. I don’t have any problem with vouchers for kids in failing school districts. They can be a godsend for parents and kids in that case. However, if you are in a good school district and want your kids to go to a private school just the same, then it should be on your own dime, not the taxpayers.
I bet he can get it.He can threaten that. But I doubt he has the money to go through with it.
The new Nevada governor is doing the same......sadly, he doesn't have to sabotage much.Iowa isn’t alone in sabotaging public schools, such as Tennessee. They’ve unwittingly pissed off the dormant independents who will now rally to take back their state from the freedumb circus.
Competition makes even good schools better. Sometimes a good school has a poor instructor for a particular grade or subject. (or a poor match for a particular student) Having a choice short of moving is not a bad thing and might force a reckoning for a poor teacher.I am fine with vouchers so long as they are only available to kids in failing school districts.
The problem with vouchers is they are often used by middle class families in good school districts so that taxpayers can fund their kids creationists education.
Sisolak was hurt by his Covid measures. Governors have to make real decisions. Nevada trended red in 2022. The three CDs D’s won were by only 10, 11, and 13k. With Amodei winning by 68k, R’s won the total state CD vote by 34k.The new Nevada governor is doing the same......sadly, he doesn't have to sabotage much.
That’s fine, do it one your dime. There is a finite amount of money available for school vouchers, that money should be spent on kids in failing schools.Competition makes even good schools better. Sometimes a good school has a poor instructor for a particular grade or subject. (or a poor match for a particular student) Having a choice short of moving is not a bad thing and might force a reckoning for a poor teacher.
I sent my son to a Jesuit High school his freshman and sophomore years thinking he need a stricter learning environment. It may have been less so.
Boot Camp did the trick 2 years later. Lol
Top performing anything by definition is the exception, not the norm.Top performing private schools are the exception, not the norm.
I went to Catholic school for a while when I was a kid. If you want to send your kid to a private school do it on your own dime. There is a finite amount of taxpayer money available for vouchers and it ought to go to kids in failing schools.Seriously? Do you actually know anything about Christian schools? There are no religious teachings. It's the same as public schools minus the trouble makers and the special needs kids. Oh, and parents pay for their kids education so they care about the results and are far more involved.