- Joined
- Sep 11, 2021
- Messages
- 9,694
- Reaction score
- 3,288
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
The respect Republicans are treating this lady with stands in stark contrast to how democrats have been treating recent Republican presidential nominees. Questions have been based on policy and judicial decisions and have been tough but fair. No personal attacks, no unsubstantiated allegations no attempt to destroy her and her family. They truly are the adults in the room and are schooling democrats on how these hearings should be conducted. It's a pleasant change to not be embarrassed for my country watching this dignified proceeding.
Other than his commentary on her going easy on pedophiles?I take it you missed Josh Hawley's contribution, then.
Other than his commentary on her going easy on pedophiles?
As per the OP her decision was questioned not her character. You only confirm the OP with your post on it.By staying inside of sentencing guidelines?
Don't pretend there's any dignity in any of this. It's the same old tired shit.
Best you can do? Worst personal attack on Jackson you can come up with? You make my point for me.Graham stormed out in a huff.
As per the OP her decision was questioned not her character. You only confirm the OP with your post on it.
Other than his commentary on her going easy on pedophiles?
Best you can do? Worst personal attack on Jackson you can come up with? You make my point for me.
Ya Beverly Leslie Graham producing fake outrage. Then the drama queen walks out. Graham is the poster child for Congressional term limits.The respect Republicans are treating this lady with stands in stark contrast to how democrats have been treating recent Republican presidential nominees. Questions have been based on policy and judicial decisions and have been tough but fair. No personal attacks, no unsubstantiated allegations no attempt to destroy her and her family. They truly are the adults in the room and are schooling democrats on how these hearings should be conducted. It's a pleasant change to not be embarrassed for my country watching this dignified proceeding.
Unfortunately that's her judicial record.Accusing her of being soft on pedophiles is disgraceful and dangerous.
Unfortunately that's her judicial record.
Even RWers call him on his bullshit.Unfortunately that's her judicial record.
You are making my point for me. No personal just no attempt to destroy her life, just questions and comments on her rulings and judicial philosophy. If I was Republican I'd be proud. As an American I'm heartened.Its hypocrisy.
Hirono went through all the Republican appointed judges who have sentenced child porn defendants to below guideline punishments and the Republican legislators who voted to confirm them.
This is part where stone throwing Republicans in glass house cry.
View attachment 67381501
Agree or not, right or wrong it's based on her rulings as it should be.Even RWers call him on his bullshit.
Senator Hawley’s Disingenuous Attack against Judge Jackson’s Record on Child Pornography | National Review
He distorts her record on ‘sex offenders.’www.nationalreview.com
Ho-Hum: The Cases Senator Hawley Cites Show Judge Jackson Is an Unremarkable Sentencer in Child-Porn Cases | National Review
The terms she has meted out are compliant with the law and usually equal or exceed the recommendations of the court’s probation department.www.nationalreview.com
You are making my point for me. No personal just no attempt to destroy her life, just questions and comments on her rulings and judicial philosophy. If I was Republican I'd be proud. As an American I'm heartened.
Cotton hasn’t finished up yet, don’t count your chickens……Best you can do? Worst personal attack on Jackson you can come up with? You make my point for me.
Just holding her to standard to which they did not hold Republican nominees, and for good reason. Its a bogus issue. It's reckless and dangerous..
Agree or not, right or wrong it's based on her rulings as it should be.
If that constitutes abuse then what was the Kavanaugh hearing? Genocide?I take it you missed Josh Hawley's contribution, then.
It's notEven RWers call him on his bullshit.
Senator Hawley’s Disingenuous Attack against Judge Jackson’s Record on Child Pornography | National Review
He distorts her record on ‘sex offenders.’www.nationalreview.com Ho-Hum: The Cases Senator Hawley Cites Show Judge Jackson Is an Unremarkable Sentencer in Child-Porn Cases | National Review
The terms she has meted out are compliant with the law and usually equal or exceed the recommendations of the court’s probation department.www.nationalreview.com
So far it's been handed with appropriate dignity to a SCOTUS nominee.Cotton hasn’t finished up yet, don’t count your chickens……
If that constitutes abuse then what was the Kavanaugh hearing? Genocide?
It's notbut it is more spin than fact.
If this is the worst that is said, it was a creampuff of a hearing. As OP says, this should be the standard and Democrats are not meeting it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?