If I was a Republican I'd be proud of Jackson hearing

[Chainsawmassacre]

The respect Republicans are treating this lady with stands in stark contrast to how democrats have been treating recent Republican presidential nominees. Questions have been based on policy and judicial decisions and have been tough but fair. No personal attacks, no unsubstantiated allegations no attempt to destroy her and her family. They truly are the adults in the room and are schooling democrats on how these hearings should be conducted. It's a pleasant change to not be embarrassed for my country watching this dignified proceeding.

 

[Luce]

The respect Republicans are treating this lady with stands in stark contrast to how democrats have been treating recent Republican presidential nominees. Questions have been based on policy and judicial decisions and have been tough but fair. No personal attacks, no unsubstantiated allegations no attempt to destroy her and her family. They truly are the adults in the room and are schooling democrats on how these hearings should be conducted. It's a pleasant change to not be embarrassed for my country watching this dignified proceeding.

I take it you missed Josh Hawley's contribution, then.

 

[Chainsawmassacre]

I take it you missed Josh Hawley's contribution, then.

Other than his commentary on her going easy on pedophiles?

 

[Luce]

Other than his commentary on her going easy on pedophiles?

By staying inside of sentencing guidelines?

Don't pretend there's any dignity in any of this. It's the same old tired shit.

 

[Rexedgar]

Graham stormed out in a huff.

 

[Chainsawmassacre]

By staying inside of sentencing guidelines?

Don't pretend there's any dignity in any of this. It's the same old tired shit.

As per the OP her decision was questioned not her character. You only confirm the OP with your post on it.

 

[Chainsawmassacre]

Graham stormed out in a huff.

Best you can do? Worst personal attack on Jackson you can come up with? You make my point for me.

 

[Luce]

As per the OP her decision was questioned not her character. You only confirm the OP with your post on it.

Horseshit. You and I both know what Hawley was trying to imply.

 

[j brown's body]

Other than his commentary on her going easy on pedophiles?

Hirono went through all the Republican appointed judges who have sentenced child porn defendants to below guideline punishments and the Republican legislators who voted to confirm them.

This is part where stone throwing Republicans in glass house cry.

 

[j brown's body]

Best you can do? Worst personal attack on Jackson you can come up with? You make my point for me.

Accusing her of being soft on pedophiles is disgraceful and dangerous.

 

[Luce]

The inverse of this is interesting.

She hasn't had to make excuses for blackout drunks or any of that.

 

[yankintx]

The respect Republicans are treating this lady with stands in stark contrast to how democrats have been treating recent Republican presidential nominees. Questions have been based on policy and judicial decisions and have been tough but fair. No personal attacks, no unsubstantiated allegations no attempt to destroy her and her family. They truly are the adults in the room and are schooling democrats on how these hearings should be conducted. It's a pleasant change to not be embarrassed for my country watching this dignified proceeding.

Ya Beverly Leslie Graham producing fake outrage. Then the drama queen walks out. Graham is the poster child for Congressional term limits.

 

[Chainsawmassacre]

Accusing her of being soft on pedophiles is disgraceful and dangerous.

Unfortunately that's her judicial record.

 

[j brown's body]

Unfortunately that's her judicial record.

Its hypocrisy.

Hirono went through all the Republican appointed judges who have sentenced child porn defendants to below guideline punishments and the Republican legislators who voted to confirm them.

This is part where stone throwing Republicans in glass house cry.

 

[Airyaman]

Unfortunately that's her judicial record.

Even RWers call him on his bullshit.

Senator Hawley’s Disingenuous Attack against Judge Jackson’s Record on Child Pornography | National Review

He distorts her record on ‘sex offenders.’

www.nationalreview.com

Ho-Hum: The Cases Senator Hawley Cites Show Judge Jackson Is an Unremarkable Sentencer in Child-Porn Cases | National Review

The terms she has meted out are compliant with the law and usually equal or exceed the recommendations of the court’s probation department.

www.nationalreview.com

 

[Chainsawmassacre]

Its hypocrisy.

Hirono went through all the Republican appointed judges who have sentenced child porn defendants to below guideline punishments and the Republican legislators who voted to confirm them.

This is part where stone throwing Republicans in glass house cry.

View attachment 67381501

You are making my point for me. No personal just no attempt to destroy her life, just questions and comments on her rulings and judicial philosophy. If I was Republican I'd be proud. As an American I'm heartened.

 

[Chainsawmassacre]

Even RWers call him on his bullshit.

Senator Hawley’s Disingenuous Attack against Judge Jackson’s Record on Child Pornography | National Review

He distorts her record on ‘sex offenders.’

www.nationalreview.com

Ho-Hum: The Cases Senator Hawley Cites Show Judge Jackson Is an Unremarkable Sentencer in Child-Porn Cases | National Review

The terms she has meted out are compliant with the law and usually equal or exceed the recommendations of the court’s probation department.

www.nationalreview.com

Agree or not, right or wrong it's based on her rulings as it should be.

 

[j brown's body]

You are making my point for me. No personal just no attempt to destroy her life, just questions and comments on her rulings and judicial philosophy. If I was Republican I'd be proud. As an American I'm heartened.

Just holding her to standard to which they did not hold Republican nominees, and for good reason. Its a bogus issue. It's reckless and dangerous..

 

[Rexedgar]

Best you can do? Worst personal attack on Jackson you can come up with? You make my point for me.

Cotton hasn’t finished up yet, don’t count your chickens……

 

[Chainsawmassacre]

Just holding her to standard to which they did not hold Republican nominees, and for good reason. Its a bogus issue. It's reckless and dangerous..

Agree or not, right or wrong it's based on her rulings as it should be.

 

[j brown's body]

Another GOP hit job. Ted Cruz - "Do you agree... that babies are racist?"

 

[Jay59]

I take it you missed Josh Hawley's contribution, then.

If that constitutes abuse then what was the Kavanaugh hearing? Genocide?

Even RWers call him on his bullshit.

Senator Hawley’s Disingenuous Attack against Judge Jackson’s Record on Child Pornography | National Review

He distorts her record on ‘sex offenders.’

www.nationalreview.com

Ho-Hum: The Cases Senator Hawley Cites Show Judge Jackson Is an Unremarkable Sentencer in Child-Porn Cases | National Review

The terms she has meted out are compliant with the law and usually equal or exceed the recommendations of the court’s probation department.

www.nationalreview.com

It's not but it is more spin than fact.

If this is the worst that is said, it was a creampuff of a hearing. As OP says, this should be the standard and Democrats are not meeting it.

 

[j brown's body]

But only for Democrats. Republican nominees' rulings that are similar get a pass.

 

[Chainsawmassacre]

Cotton hasn’t finished up yet, don’t count your chickens……

So far it's been handed with appropriate dignity to a SCOTUS nominee.

 

[j brown's body]

If that constitutes abuse then what was the Kavanaugh hearing? Genocide?


It's not but it is more spin than fact.

If this is the worst that is said, it was a creampuff of a hearing. As OP says, this should be the standard and Democrats are not meeting it.

No one has accused Jackson of sexual assault.