• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

If I was a Republican I'd be proud of Jackson hearing

Chainsawmassacre

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 11, 2021
Messages
9,694
Reaction score
3,288
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
The respect Republicans are treating this lady with stands in stark contrast to how democrats have been treating recent Republican presidential nominees. Questions have been based on policy and judicial decisions and have been tough but fair. No personal attacks, no unsubstantiated allegations no attempt to destroy her and her family. They truly are the adults in the room and are schooling democrats on how these hearings should be conducted. It's a pleasant change to not be embarrassed for my country watching this dignified proceeding.
 
The respect Republicans are treating this lady with stands in stark contrast to how democrats have been treating recent Republican presidential nominees. Questions have been based on policy and judicial decisions and have been tough but fair. No personal attacks, no unsubstantiated allegations no attempt to destroy her and her family. They truly are the adults in the room and are schooling democrats on how these hearings should be conducted. It's a pleasant change to not be embarrassed for my country watching this dignified proceeding.

I take it you missed Josh Hawley's contribution, then.
 
By staying inside of sentencing guidelines?

Don't pretend there's any dignity in any of this. It's the same old tired shit.
As per the OP her decision was questioned not her character. You only confirm the OP with your post on it.
 
As per the OP her decision was questioned not her character. You only confirm the OP with your post on it.

Horseshit. You and I both know what Hawley was trying to imply.
 
Other than his commentary on her going easy on pedophiles?

Hirono went through all the Republican appointed judges who have sentenced child porn defendants to below guideline punishments and the Republican legislators who voted to confirm them.

This is part where stone throwing Republicans in glass house cry.
 
The respect Republicans are treating this lady with stands in stark contrast to how democrats have been treating recent Republican presidential nominees. Questions have been based on policy and judicial decisions and have been tough but fair. No personal attacks, no unsubstantiated allegations no attempt to destroy her and her family. They truly are the adults in the room and are schooling democrats on how these hearings should be conducted. It's a pleasant change to not be embarrassed for my country watching this dignified proceeding.
Ya Beverly Leslie Graham producing fake outrage. Then the drama queen walks out. Graham is the poster child for Congressional term limits.
 
Unfortunately that's her judicial record.

Its hypocrisy.

Hirono went through all the Republican appointed judges who have sentenced child porn defendants to below guideline punishments and the Republican legislators who voted to confirm them.

This is part where stone throwing Republicans in glass house cry.

Screenshot_20220322-184922_Twitter.jpg
 
Unfortunately that's her judicial record.
Even RWers call him on his bullshit.


 
Its hypocrisy.

Hirono went through all the Republican appointed judges who have sentenced child porn defendants to below guideline punishments and the Republican legislators who voted to confirm them.

This is part where stone throwing Republicans in glass house cry.

View attachment 67381501
You are making my point for me. No personal just no attempt to destroy her life, just questions and comments on her rulings and judicial philosophy. If I was Republican I'd be proud. As an American I'm heartened.
 
Even RWers call him on his bullshit.


Agree or not, right or wrong it's based on her rulings as it should be.
 
You are making my point for me. No personal just no attempt to destroy her life, just questions and comments on her rulings and judicial philosophy. If I was Republican I'd be proud. As an American I'm heartened.

Just holding her to standard to which they did not hold Republican nominees, and for good reason. Its a bogus issue. It's reckless and dangerous..
 
Best you can do? Worst personal attack on Jackson you can come up with? You make my point for me.
Cotton hasn’t finished up yet, don’t count your chickens……
 
Another GOP hit job. Ted Cruz - "Do you agree... that babies are racist?"
 
I take it you missed Josh Hawley's contribution, then.
If that constitutes abuse then what was the Kavanaugh hearing? Genocide?

Even RWers call him on his bullshit.
It's not :poop: but it is more spin than fact.

If this is the worst that is said, it was a creampuff of a hearing. As OP says, this should be the standard and Democrats are not meeting it.
 
But only for Democrats. Republican nominees' rulings that are similar get a pass.
 
If that constitutes abuse then what was the Kavanaugh hearing? Genocide?


It's not :poop: but it is more spin than fact.

If this is the worst that is said, it was a creampuff of a hearing. As OP says, this should be the standard and Democrats are not meeting it.

No one has accused Jackson of sexual assault.
 
Back
Top Bottom