What part of "I am armed as well" are you missing? So even if a possibility exists, it is irrelevant unless said person is breaking the law.
I'm speculating about future events. Obviously they're not violent
right now.
Ding, ding, ding! We have a winner! :lol:
As I said I am more worried about blacks rioting over court decisions, and whites rioting over sports teams winning or losing. When was the last time "right wingers," "conservatives" or "Republicans" got violent over a political issue? The civil war? :lol:
How does it feel to live in fear of nothing?
Obviously I don't think it's nothing, so we'll see who is right. Even then I'm not saying it's definately not happening, just that it's a possibility.
So apparently you think it is not okay to call someone a liar even without knowing what was said. Apparently you don't adhere to the "civility" promise of this forum.
I was on that thread. I know what was said.
We are no longer on topic. I, out of courtesy answered your response to my post. You provided nothing but innuendo and obfuscation without any logical basis and insinuated that I lied. I no longer feel the need to respond to your off topic rants or the need to be courteous towards you.
What illogic? What part of my statement did you find illogical? The part where I disagreed with your claim that I was equating Beck and Limbaugh, or the part where I was disagreeing with your claim that all attacks on Obama were labeled racist because your
barber of all people said so? Name calling won't win you any arguments. Please point out where I was being so "illogical".
By the title of this thread, it seems that you expect the majority of the population to be VIOLENTLY against THIS health care reform package which, no matter what they say, includes government takeover of 1/6th of the economy. I will not be for any HC legislation which aims to do that no matter how it affects your acquaintances who apparently have no faith, family or friends.
You are making assumptions on what I said. Your assumption that I expect the majority of the population to VIOLENTLY against this is not something I expect at all. I expect a small core group of people to be violently against it, which is something else entirely.
And people without faith, family, or friends that can help pay ridiculously high medical bills happen, it's not something you can deny. If they can't get enough help from private institutions, they have a problem and we as a society should try to help them.
The violent protestors at the G20 were leftest liberals. I don't recall any organized conservative violence.
All attacks on Obama's actions, policies and initiatives are labeled racist by some. Carter stated the "vast majority".
There might be a few out there that blame all opposition, but they're not any sort of majority. There's a few kooks out there but there's always a few kooks out there. But when you see things like Obama portrayed as an African witch doctor you can't help wonder if a small part of his opponents are racist.
I won't be responding to your illogic in this thread again.
Just because you don't agree with what I say doesn't make it illogic.