• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

If guns make us safer.....

Which is MINUSCULE and proven to be better controlled by "wholistic" methods like dealing with addiction, gang, and drug violence. Imagine if our nation fixed our drug laws and handled addiction better? What level of drop do you think we would see? There are States with legal firearm ownership and low crime rates due to better handling of these issues. Why not focus on this?

the anti gun legions are afraid to publicly come out and say (for the most part) what their real goals are-to get rid of pro gun groups as a voting bloc and to kill off legal gun ownership. So instead they lie about only wanting "common sense" gun laws or "to keep morons" from having guns. Of course to do that, they happily want to abolish the gun rights of millions.
 
the anti gun legions are afraid to publicly come out and say (for the most part) what their real goals are-to get rid of pro gun groups as a voting bloc and to kill off legal gun ownership. So instead they lie about only wanting "common sense" gun laws or "to keep morons" from having guns. Of course to do that, they happily want to abolish the gun rights of millions.

The idea that any measure of gun control is a secret hidden conspiracy to ben every gun from existence is so laughable that everyone with a brain can see right thru that paranoid delusion.
 
Well actually every state has legal firearm ownership but we are far from what other countries have achieved. My god if we had a much much much higher level of traffic deaths qwe would immediatley look at our traffic laws compared to other countries that had less traffic deaths. Would we say....its just our culture. How ridiculous

The difference is that if we examined traffic laws...we would examine the circumstances of the incidents rather than demand we take cars away from everyone. A lot of murder involves convicted criminals, addiction, and/or gang related violence. Domestic violence as well. These are all related and have a lot to do with how we handle these issues in America. Culturally, legally, and so on. So why aren't we looking at these issues like that? Because it is too easy to blame guns.




The crowd is not the sum of its parts.

I am a republican who did not vote for Trump (Or Hillary).
 
The difference is that if we examined traffic laws...we would examine the circumstances of the incidents rather than demand we take cars away from everyone. A lot of murder involves convicted criminals, addiction, and/or gang related violence. Domestic violence as well. These are all related and have a lot to do with how we handle these issues in America. Culturally, legally, and so on. So why aren't we looking at these issues like that? Because it is too easy to blame guns.

Might we do something like require licensing with a written and performance test, a background check of the driver and registration of the vehicle? Oh wait we already did all those things in an attemtp to reduce auto deaths. We should do the same for guns
 
The difference is that if we examined traffic laws...we would examine the circumstances of the incidents rather than demand we take cars away from everyone. A lot of murder involves convicted criminals, addiction, and/or gang related violence. Domestic violence as well. These are all related and have a lot to do with how we handle these issues in America. Culturally, legally, and so on. So why aren't we looking at these issues like that? Because it is too easy to blame guns.

if you read his response, you will see he lies again when he claims all he wants is just a form
 
Its a form. Even you can't deny that

Is it just a form, with no other actions/costs? Can I just print one out and have the transferee fill it out, sign it, and have it back?
 
Is it just a form, with no other actions/costs? Can I just print one out and have the transferee fill it out, sign it, and have it back?

You mean you might have to leave your house??? The horror. LOL
 
How do people even survive this madness in Europe????

How do you go from "it's just a form" to wondering how it being more than a form is not such a big deal? You contradict yourself every single time.

The correct answer to "it's not just a form, is it?" should have two possible answers: "Correct, just fill out the form and you're done", or "it's a form, hours or days of active time/wait time, fees and governmental permission, so no, it's not just a form".


Anything else is you tap-dancing.
 
Lets take the private property one. You say property owners can deny me my constitutional right to carry a gun. Can they deny entrance to a black person? Don't you need compelling interest to restrict a right? I thought guns would make that property safer?

The bolded question is irrelevant to this topic. As far as the red statement, some people don't agree that guns make things safer.
 
We live in a country where gun activists believe it is okay for people to buy machine guns. The NRA has people believing they need a gun to protect themselves from this mystical tyrannical government.

How often have those people fired their weapons in a criminal act? And furthermore, so?
 
Last edited:
How do you go from "it's just a form" to wondering how it being more than a form is not such a big deal? You contradict yourself every single time.

The correct answer to "it's not just a form, is it?" should have two possible answers: "Correct, just fill out the form and you're done", or "it's a form, hours or days of active time/wait time, fees and governmental permission, so no, it's not just a form".


Anything else is you tap-dancing.
Its just a form. Much less painful than a passport application which I believe you somehow managed to survive. This drama over this simple form is ridiculous
 
Its just a form. Much less painful than a passport application which I believe you somehow managed to survive. This drama over this simple form is ridiculous

Great. No fees, no background check, no waiting. Thanks for the confirmation.
 
The idea that any measure of gun control is a secret hidden conspiracy to ben every gun from existence is so laughable that everyone with a brain can see right thru that paranoid delusion.


So tell me is it a paranoid delusion when you hear it directly from the mouth of the elected law makers?

Dianne Feinstein 1995~ "If I could have got 51 votes in the senate of the United States for an out right ban, picking up every last one of them! Mr. & Mrs. America turn them all in! I would have done it!"

 
Is it just a form, with no other actions/costs? Can I just print one out and have the transferee fill it out, sign it, and have it back?

You aren't going to get an honest answer. and the fact is-he has gushed over far more restrictive laws
 
How do you go from "it's just a form" to wondering how it being more than a form is not such a big deal? You contradict yourself every single time.

The correct answer to "it's not just a form, is it?" should have two possible answers: "Correct, just fill out the form and you're done", or "it's a form, hours or days of active time/wait time, fees and governmental permission, so no, it's not just a form".


Anything else is you tap-dancing.

He constantly lies and he constantly shows his posts are dishonest. His thousands of frantic anti gun posts show continual praise for all sorts of laws that are designed to prevent law abiding citizens from being able to own guns such as

1) laws in some countries that require you prove NEED to own a gun

2) all sorts of licensing requirements and fees

3) claiming he wants to ban "morons" form being able to own guns Such a standard allows him to claim anyone who doesn't buy into his frantic anti gun hatred should not be able t wn a gun
 
So tell me is it a paranoid delusion when you hear it directly from the mouth of the elected law makers?

Dianne Feinstein 1995~ "If I could have got 51 votes in the senate of the United States for an out right ban, picking up every last one of them! Mr. & Mrs. America turn them all in! I would have done it!"



Yes it is paranoid delusion. The chances of her passing such a bill is exactly zero percent.
 
He constantly lies and he constantly shows his posts are dishonest. His thousands of frantic anti gun posts show continual praise for all sorts of laws that are designed to prevent law abiding citizens from being able to own guns such as

1) laws in some countries that require you prove NEED to own a gun

2) all sorts of licensing requirements and fees

3) claiming he wants to ban "morons" form being able to own guns Such a standard allows him to claim anyone who doesn't buy into his frantic anti gun hatred should not be able t wn a gun

The absolute terror that gun nuts have over a simple form is a source of constant laughter in me.
 
The absolute terror that gun nuts have over a simple form is a source of constant laughter in me.

The fact you you can still post that lie is a constant reminder of the lack of honesty of your position.
 
The fact you you can still post that lie is a constant reminder of the lack of honesty of your position.

It is the absolute truth and a source of constant amusement to me
 
Yes it is paranoid delusion. The chances of her passing such a bill is exactly zero percent.

Really? Its called death by a million paper cuts. First its a semi-automatic "assault weapons" & Hi Capacity magazine ban. When that doesn't work they neuter your hand guns to only hold five rounds. They will continue to pass BS, feel good laws, and force the supreme court to over turn the law if they decide to hear the case. Considering the only thing it would take is a willing President, willing congress, that is much higher probability than zero percent!
 
The fact you you can still post that lie is a constant reminder of the lack of honesty of your position.

Its why I ignore the silliness. All we get are dishonest lies.
 
Back
Top Bottom