CaughtInThe
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2017
- Messages
- 149,597
- Reaction score
- 172,544
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Because that's who we are as humans. That's how we protect our children globally and across religions.
The opposite of trans isn't straight?If a trans (or straight)
Because that's who we are as humans. That's how we protect our children globally and across religions.
shhh. i'm still trying to learn how to create provocative thread titles.The opposite of trans isn't straight?
and speaking of that, i've ALWAYS wondered how many unsolved murders were actually known about by priests.A catholic priest does not have to report murder from a confessional
I don't knowand speaking of that, i've ALWAYS wondered how many unsolved murders were actually known about by priests.
covering up crimes in confession or whatever is a global cancer.This is insane. I get that they believe that God can offer forgiveness... that doesn't mean that they should not have to answer for crime.
the dead ones?Ultimately victims need to speak out if they want justice.
Or... and now hear me out... we can dismantle the organizational structures that protect the abusers.Ultimately victims need to speak out if they want justice.
Ultimately victims need to speak out if they want justice.
They always know who the perpetrator is.Ultimately victims need to speak out if they want justice.
Or more likely as we have seen time and time again the church uses it’s institutional power to protect the abuser.I'm actually in favor of this. It in no way interferes with the full power of society to investigate crimes; it is simply a voluntary issue spiritually for the criminal. It might 'feel' outrageous for a priest to know of horrible crimes, but ending the practice doesn't help solve crimes, really, as criminals stop confessing.
On the other hand, how churches handle such confessions is another matter. Preventing further crimes, possibly demanding they turn themselves in (penance is part of confession), possibly expelling them from the Church, and so on.
I can only think of cases of that when the abuser has been a church official. I know there has been a lot of demand for change on that, I'm not sure where it is.Or more likely as we have seen time and time again the church uses it’s institutional power to protect the abuser.
Republicans protecting child molesters under the guise of religion.
Republicans also fought to legalize underage girls to be able to marry.
This isn't really that. It's not like the priest walks in on someone committing a crime, and helps them cover it up. In that case, they need to help the police.
Unrelated, its own problem.
'Knowing a crime' is generally a very different situation than the confessional. Should we remove the protection for spousal protection also?If you know of a crime and don't report it, you are protecting that individual. This is what is being done only under the guise of religion. So yes, Republicans are protecting child molesters if they don't report them.
'Knowing a crime' is generally a very different situation than the confessional. Should we remove the protection for spousal protection also?
as should Islamists.Or... and now hear me out... we can dismantle the organizational structures that protect the abusers.
Does Islam have a version of confessional secrecy? I've really only seen it in Catholicism, though the thread raises it for Mormons. I'm not familiar with others including Jewish.as should Islamists.