• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Idiotic Environmental Predictions

Science does not work by popularity or votes. Those of you who believe that clearly do not understand science.
You for some reason think that science is best understood by some guy who’s never done any work in the field, has partial scientific research access that he pays for because he thinks it sounds cool, and gets his scientific info from wingnut writing that he backextrapolates through misunderstanding scientific papers.

I’ll go with the experts, myself.
 
Science does not work by popularity or votes. Those of you who believe that clearly do not understand science.

You're right about that, however, politics does work that way, and so does religion.
What's happening can be summed up by this quote:

“The Revolution won't happen with guns, rather it will happen incrementally, year
by year, generation by generation. We will gradually infiltrate their educational
institutions and their political offices, transforming them slowly into Marxist entities
as we move towards universal egalitarianism.” - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Max Horkheimer


What Horkeimer left out was the infiltration of the media and science.
 
You for some reason think that science is best understood by some guy who’s never done any work in the field, has partial scientific research access that he pays for because he thinks it sounds cool, and gets his scientific info from wingnut writing that he backextrapolates through misunderstanding scientific papers.

I’ll go with the experts, myself.
Except you are not directly listening to the experts. You are listing to people who lie about what the papers actually can show.
 
Except you are not directly listening to the experts. You are listing to people who lie about what the papers actually can show.
No. I'm absolutely listening to experts, and you never have.

Heres an expert. She writes lots of papers, is an endowed chair at Texas Tech, and will directly tell you what scientists think.

But you wont listen, I'm sure.

 
No. I'm absolutely listening to experts, and you never have.

Heres an expert. She writes lots of papers, is an endowed chair at Texas Tech, and will directly tell you what scientists think.

But you wont listen, I'm sure.


You can find talks both ways. What matters is what these scientists can prove,
 
You can find talks both ways. What matters is what these scientists can prove,
You can always find a few kooks. But you dont see them getting keynote addresses at AGU meetings for a reason.

Look - its obviously very understandable and quite clear where the science and scientists are on this issue. You refuse to believe it or recognize it for whatever bizarre reason you have.
 
No. I'm absolutely listening to experts, and you never have.

Heres an expert. She writes lots of papers, is an endowed chair at Texas Tech, and will directly tell you what scientists think.

But you wont listen, I'm sure.


Well I watched her talk, and was unaware that more data than the temperature could be gathered from a thermometer.
She clearly believes in CO2 driven climate change, but did not "talk about" any of the evidence
showing that added CO2 causes warming.
 
You can always find a few kooks. But you dont see them getting keynote addresses at AGU meetings for a reason.

Look - its obviously very understandable and quite clear where the science and scientists are on this issue. You refuse to believe it or recognize it for whatever bizarre reason you have.
I watched the video. Did you?

She has not spoke of the science at all. She speaks like a charlatan. She is part of The Nature Conservancy. Her college credentials are in physics and astronomy. Not the atmospheric sciences.

She talk about how we will have more frequent and more precipitation, then she speaks of worrying about water shortages.

Wind and solar saving tax payer dollars? Bullshit.

She speaks of mitigation from a perceived threat. there wasn't a single ounce of science in that video.

She is an activist. She makes money doing the "TED talks."
 
Well I watched her talk, and was unaware that more data than the temperature could be gathered from a thermometer.
She clearly believes in CO2 driven climate change, but did not "talk about" any of the evidence
showing that added CO2 causes warming.
That's all the cult followers need, is a convincing charlatan.
 
I got a laugh when I saw this looking for her YouTube stuff:

1753385264380.webp

It has become a religion.
 
I watched the video. Did you?

She has not spoke of the science at all. She speaks like a charlatan. She is part of The Nature Conservancy. Her college credentials are in physics and astronomy. Not the atmospheric sciences.

She talk about how we will have more frequent and more precipitation, then she speaks of worrying about water shortages.

Wind and solar saving tax payer dollars? Bullshit.

She speaks of mitigation from a perceived threat. there wasn't a single ounce of science in that video.

She is an activist. She makes money doing the "TED talks."
You said you need to listen to real scientists and what they think. So I shared that with you. Your complaint is that it wasnt exactly what you want. I didnt present some scientific presentation, because theres nothing to argue about - you are unable to critique the science credibly, because you dont know much about the field. So I presented a talk thats a summary of an actual scientist's views. And you pretend that theres 'not a single ounce of science' in the talk. I can only conclude you dont understand jack shit about science.

Heres a talk she did at the AGU meeting, in front of thousands of accomplished scientists like herself. A room you wouldnt be able to get in.


I get it. When you hear a scientist tell you things you dont want to hear, they are 'activists'. Its a way of coping with the cognitive dissonance.
 
Well I watched her talk, and was unaware that more data than the temperature could be gathered from a thermometer.
Good for you.
She clearly believes in CO2 driven climate change, but did not "talk about" any of the evidence
showing that added CO2 causes warming.
Now go away and keep trying to pretend that outgoing longwave radiation is the key to bringing all of climate science down. Its adorable.
 
I got a laugh when I saw this looking for her YouTube stuff:

View attachment 67581426

It has become a religion.
You dont understand, as usual.

She's an evangelical Christian and is speaking to other evangelicals telling them that the point of view that their guys promote is idiotic.
 
Good for you.

Now go away and keep trying to pretend that outgoing longwave radiation is the key to bringing all of climate science down. Its adorable.
The outgoing radiation vs the incoming radiation only indicates if the earth system is losing or gaining heat. That is all. That heat manifests itself in three ways. State changes like ice melting, temperature changes, and chemical changes like photosynthesis removing heat from its environment to create more complex molecules.

It is not only about temperature.
You dont understand, as usual.
My God man. i said I laughed.
She's an evangelical Christian and is speaking to other evangelicals telling them that the point of view that their guys promote is idiotic.
And she has the same type of "faith" in the science that is not proven, like religion.
 
No. I'm absolutely listening to experts, and you never have.

Heres an expert. She writes lots of papers, is an endowed chair at Texas Tech, and will directly tell you what scientists think.

But you wont listen, I'm sure.



You Tube has a nice feature, if you click on [more] and follow to the bottom where it says [Show Transcript]
Click on that and it can be copied out and pasted into your favorite software.

Here's just two quotes from that six year old You Tube:

Because no matter where we live,
climate change is already affecting us today.

Yes it is, here in Milwaukee we have been enjoying very mild winters. The hideous cold snaps from the '50s '60s & '70s seem to be a thing of the past.

we are seeing stronger hurricanes, typhoons and cyclones,
powered by a warming ocean.

Here's Ryan Maue's graph that sure looks like what Heyhoe says isn't true.

global_major_freq.png


I'm sure you don't like Ryan Maue. I was going to put up a Wikipedia article about him, but all I found was left wing web sites. Here's a sample:

Ryan Maue is not a scientist and not an expert on climate science.
He is a private person who is known for his climate change sceptic
and denialist views, which got him a appointment in the Trump
administration, has worked for climate science denying think tanks
and is deeply interconnected in the climate denial machine.

Any way, I haven't seen his very nice graphs of All and Major Tropical Cyclone activity shown to be wrong.
 
You Tube has a nice feature, if you click on [more] and follow to the bottom where it says [Show Transcript]
Click on that and it can be copied out and pasted into your favorite software.

Here's just two quotes from that six year old You Tube:



Yes it is, here in Milwaukee we have been enjoying very mild winters. The hideous cold snaps from the '50s '60s & '70s seem to be a thing of the past.



Here's Ryan Maue's graph that sure looks like what Heyhoe says isn't true.

global_major_freq.png


I'm sure you don't like Ryan Maue. I was going to put up a Wikipedia article about him, but all I found was left wing web sites. Here's a sample:

Ryan Maue is not a scientist and not an expert on climate science.
He is a private person who is known for his climate change sceptic
and denialist views, which got him a appointment in the Trump
administration, has worked for climate science denying think tanks
and is deeply interconnected in the climate denial machine.

Any way, I haven't seen his very nice graphs of All and Major Tropical Cyclone activity shown to be wrong.
That’s nice.

Enjoy your personal alternate reality.
 
(92) Doubling Energy Costs - YouTube

Tony Heller, May 17, 2024

Wind power is not reliable, and thus requires 100% backup at all times. Consumers are paying for two types of electricity instead of just one.
Wind power is not reliable, as demonstrate by UK wind power that produce recently only 4% of the 10% electricity grid. The operation of wind turbines is very expensive, making electricity unaffordable for may people in the UK. Gas and oil provide electricity at affordable energy cost. UK energy policy is dictated by ideology, rather than common sense.
 
Climate Engineering

Tony Heller, May 19, 2024

Another story about the press, academia and government working together to engineer a complete fake climate story.
Excellent video, Tony expose the lies about the forest’s firers, showing that since 1930 the total acreage burned has plummeted.
 
Excellent article by Walter E. Williams summarizing the fail environmental predictions. The actual environmental movement led by the ‘Progressives/Regressive’ with the disguise to save humankind, is a tool to advance the socialist agenda. This movement can be compare to a watermelon, ‘green on the outside and red inside.” Green is the new red.
Excellent article by Walter E. Williams summarizing the fail environmental predictions. The actual environmental movement led by the ‘Progressives/Regressive’ with the disguise to save humankind, is a tool to advance the socialist agenda. This movement can be compare to a watermelon, ‘green on the outside and red inside.” Green is the new red.
Mikhail Gorbachev went from President of the USSR to President of The World Green Party. The USSR didn't do anything to help the environment so what was his qualification for an environmental group? Anti-Capitalism.
 
Looking For Their Lost Keys

Posted on May 28 by Tony Heller

Nothing which governments are doing under the name of climate makes any sense. It is all a smokescreen to hide other agendas.
The story has nothing to do with reality. Solar and wind don’t supply affordable energy. China burned more coal than the rest of the world and Asia has built near 1,000 coal fire power plants. No matter what the West does, the amount of CO2 keeps growing. The UN says that climate is in meltdown, is not true, the amount of ice had increased.
 
Solar and wind don’t supply affordable energy.
Very affordable at my house. I pay zero every month on my electric utility bills. I pay zero for gasoline. It's all from my 10kW rooftop solar array. The $450 that I used to pay for energy each month is gone. The savings pay for the rooftop installation.
 
The story has nothing to do with reality. Solar and wind don’t supply affordable energy. China burned more coal than the rest of the world and Asia has built near 1,000 coal fire power plants. No matter what the West does, the amount of CO2 keeps growing. The UN says that climate is in meltdown, is not true, the amount of ice had increased.
Can you imaging if we allow the global Kabol to control out energy?
 
Hockey Match

Posted on June 5, 2024 by Tony Heller

Earth was much warmer 5,000 years ago when atmospheric CO2 levels were lower - so people whose income depends on climate alarmism had to rewrite history.
Based on the video evidence, 5,000 years ago the Earth was warmer than now, which demonstrated that the hockey stick graph is wrong. The predictions that the Artic will be ice free between 2013 and 2021, have been wrong. According to Heller “the climate scam seems to be doing extremely well.”
 
Based on the video evidence, 5,000 years ago the Earth was warmer than now, which demonstrated that the hockey stick graph is wrong. The predictions that the Artic will be ice free between 2013 and 2021, have been wrong. According to Heller “the climate scam seems to be doing extremely well.”
Video evidence from 5000 years ago? Highly unlikely.
 
Back
Top Bottom