- Joined
- Dec 22, 2012
- Messages
- 66,657
- Reaction score
- 22,230
- Location
- Portlandia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
I would claim the reverse. Those who listen to the median without understanding these sciences seem to have the declining intelligence. Especially they have to resort to name-calling over facts. calling someone a "denier" is purposely name-calling. Calling a proper skeptic, a denier, is no different than calling someone a faggot, nazi, etc.The level of intellect seems to be declining rapidly..... with these climate change deniers.....
Why are people so quick to blame this on climate change? There are normal cyclical factors that are the major variables for floods and droughts. I find most the people who suddenly follow the narrative that "climate change" is being primarily cause by us, are ignorant to reality.maybe some of them need to get flooded out, or things dry out and wild fire rages and wipe them out, or Lake Mead goes completely dry....
Also. Have you noticed the homogenization of AGW and climate change? This is to fool people. Scientific topics should remain more specific.
Why do you believe this as fact?Its seems to take something to impact them at the level of full devastation before they wake up.
Do you have a crystal ball? How do you know this?Then they will be asking, why no one warned them before.... (that's seem to be what at play here).
What year of a car?Maybe if they close their garage door, start the car and take a nap with the car windows down, they might figure out what is being discussed about climate change.