Idiotic Environmental Predictions

[Lord of Planar]

Happy bot day, everybody!

Yes. You are a happy bot.

 

[Sandokan]

(36) The 2007 Nobel Peace Prize - YouTube

Tony Heller Posted February 23, 2024

At the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize ceremony, Al Gore said the world was spinning out of kilter, and predicted an ice-free Arctic by 2014. Since then, Arctic sea ice extent has increased.

Al Gore in 2007 said that a study by the US Navy warned the Artic would be ice free in 7 years and the world was spinning out of kilter (balance). In 2022 the US government said the Artic is the warmer place on Earth. Since 2007 the Artic sea ice extend has increased. The predictions have been wrong.

 

[Threegoofs]

Al Gore in 2007 said that a study by the US Navy warned the Artic would be ice free in 7 years and the world was spinning out of kilter (balance). In 2022 the US government said the Artic is the warmer place on Earth. Since 2007 the Artic sea ice extend has increased. The predictions have been wrong.

the bot awakens

 

[Steve Case]

the bot awakens

And he's oh, so good,
And he's oh, so fine,
And he's oh, so healthy,
And he spouts the party line
He's a well respected climatologist,
Writing science papers so progressively.

 

[Sandokan]

Real Climate Science

Tony Heller Posted February 28, 2024

Government agencies tampering with climate data has made legitimate climate science difficult to find. In this short video we bypass the propaganda and do some real climate science.

In the video Tony Heller demonstrate how government agencies tamper with climate data to create the appearance of a correlation with carbon dioxide which has nothing to do with reality. Great work by Tony.

 

[Lord of Planar]

In the video Tony Heller demonstrate how government agencies tamper with climate data to create the appearance of a correlation with carbon dioxide which has nothing to do with reality. Great work by Tony.

This is interesting too.

 

[Threegoofs]

This is interesting too.

Protip:

Bots don’t watch videos

 

[Lord of Planar]

Protip:

Bots don’t watch videos

There you go with your denial again.

 

[Lord of Planar]

Protip:

Bots don’t watch videos

How about watching something from one of the best atmospheric scientists alive, in this post is a video:

Climate Change Censorship Under Trump

Let me correct that. No but the news is where most people get their misinformation! Yes, we're aware right wing media has brainwashed the **** out of you.

debatepolitics.com

 

[Sandokan]

Drowning In Propaganda

Tony Heller Posted March 7, 2024

Another example of the press and a government agency working together to create a 100% fictional climate story.

The tide gauges in the world do not show any indication of an acceleration in the rate of sea level and no human impact. NASA says sea level is rising 4 mm per year, but NOAH says is less than half. In the last 6 years NASA altered the data. On February 2024 the New York Time article says that he east coast is sinking up to 4 cm per decade to scare people. Obama has purchased mansions on the beaches of Massachusetts and Hawaii. According to Tony “climate scam pays extremely well.”

 

[Volunteer]

According to Tony “climate scam pays extremely well.”

According to S & P Global, ExxonMobil (XOM), Chevron (CVX), ConocoPhillips (CPP), EOG Resources (EOG) and Schlumberger (SLB) — have raked in more than $250 billion in profits between 2021 and 2023.

Who is getting paid extremely well???

 

[longview]

According to S & P Global, ExxonMobil (XOM), Chevron (CVX), ConocoPhillips (CPP), EOG Resources (EOG) and Schlumberger (SLB) — have raked in more than $250 billion in profits between 2021 and 2023.

Who is getting paid extremely well???

If you are on a tenure track at a university, the oil companies profits do not matter to you.
Winning NSF grants do matter.

 

[Steve Case]

The tide gauges in the world do not show any indication of an acceleration in the rate of sea level and no human impact. NASA says sea level is rising 4 mm per year, but NOAH says is less than half. In the last 6 years NASA altered the data. On February 2024 the New York Time article says that he east coast is sinking up to 4 cm per decade to scare people. Obama has purchased mansions on the beaches of Massachusetts and Hawaii. According to Tony “climate scam pays extremely well.”

"...tide gauges in the world do not show any indication of an acceleration in the rate of sea level [rise]"

Pretty close to the truth. Here's acceleration derived from tide gauges with records of 100+ years or more:

That's three years old, so currently there's probably a few more than 67 stations with a century of data.

 

[longview]

"...tide gauges in the world do not show any indication of an acceleration in the rate of sea level [rise]"

Pretty close to the truth. Here's acceleration derived from tide gauges with records of 100+ years or more:

That's three years old, so currently there's probably a few more than 67 stations with a century of data.

The math is kind of funny, but Tide gauges and satellites cannot show the same data.
A tide gauge is a fixed location, while the lapse time between satellite measurements and actual tides, make
a satellite measurement for a single location all but impossible.
(It has to do with the period of the sampling, combined with the full tidal cycle.)

 

[Steve Case]

The math is kind of funny, but Tide gauges and satellites cannot show the same data.
A tide gauge is a fixed location, while the lapse time between satellite measurements and actual tides, make
a satellite measurement for a single location all but impossible.
(It has to do with the period of the sampling, combined with the full tidal cycle.)

Besides that, the people who run the sea level by satellite site, rewrite
the original data as standard procedure, or at least it looks that way.

Several years ago it looked like this:

If the original data weren't constantly adjusted, all those plots would fall on top of each other.
Here's what They've done since 2016:

The data from 1993 to 1998 was changed to show a higher rate of sea level rise which in turn produced a belly
in the over all curve that wasn't there before and an acceleration of 0.083 mm/yr². That's a bit different from
the 0.01mm/yr² that the tide gauges show.

A bit of history shows that the folks at Colorado University's Sea Level Research Group
wanted to see acceleration in the rate sea level rise nearly 15 years ago. You can follow
this LINK to their presentation:

Why has an acceleration of sea level rise
not been observed during the altimeter era?

That's old stuff, but it is a reminder as to what they are
all about and deserves to be repeated from time to time.

 

[longview]

Besides that, the people who run the sea level by satellite site, rewrite
the original data as standard procedure, or at least it looks that way.

Several years ago it looked like this:

If the original data weren't constantly adjusted, all those plots would fall on top of each other.
Here's what They've done since 2016:

The data from 1993 to 1998 was changed to show a higher rate of sea level rise which in turn produced a belly
in the over all curve that wasn't there before and an acceleration of 0.083 mm/yr². That's a bit different from
the 0.01mm/yr² that the tide gauges show.

A bit of history shows that the folks at Colorado University's Sea Level Research Group
wanted to see acceleration in the rate sea level rise nearly 15 years ago. You can follow
this LINK to their presentation:

Why has an acceleration of sea level rise
not been observed during the altimeter era?

That's old stuff, but it is a reminder as to what they are
all about and deserves to be repeated from time to time.

One of the real problems with satellite measurement of the sea level is the predicted tide and the resulting error.
The accuracy of a satellite measurement, is tied to the accuracy of the predicted tide level.
Virginia Key, FL - Station ID: 8723214
So on any given day the difference between the predicted tide and the observed tide could be 6 inches or more.
Saying that the sea level rose 3mm in a year, with hard accuracy limit of 25 mm, and a secondary error of 153 mm in any given day,
is to say the least problematic.
The wavelength limited error of about 25 mm alone means that the satellite would have to be up 8 years to see a single
least significant bit increase!!

 

[Volunteer]

the oil companies profits do not matter to you.

In the national debate over energy/climate, though, oil profits are elephant-in-the-room relevant. How can they be ignored??

 

[longview]

In the national debate over energy/climate, though, oil profits are elephant-in-the-room relevant. How can they be ignored??

The finished fuel products companies fill a market demand with a legal product, and yes they make
a profit from turning a raw material (Oil) into a finished product.
But they will be producing finished fuel products for as long as a demand exists for high energy density fuels,
and that is likely to be long after oil has priced itself from the market.
Oil companies and their profits can be ignored, because political ideology will not change the physics behind
the demand for their products.

 

[Lord of Planar]

In the national debate over energy/climate, though, oil profits are elephant-in-the-room relevant. How can they be ignored??

Before you complain about the profits, maybe you should look at the tax revenues off those profits.

The more profit, the more tax revenue.

 

[Fearandloathing]

Very interesting and well documented video by Tony Heller in a calm and rational presentation of facts. Peer review are dishonest in the interpretation of the actual results. They have replace scientific method with pseudoscience. They exaggerate the global warming claims and do not refute the findings of experts in climatology with rigorous scientific results.

Jesus!


Archaic bullshit re-heated decades later!


Man am tired of these lies.

 

[longview]

Jesus!


Archaic bullshit re-heated decades later!


Man am tired of these lies.

What lies? At this point it would be very difficult for someone to publish a study
saying that CO2 is not the majority cause of warming since 1978.
Here is one I am surprised made it through.
The Influence of IR Absorption and Backscatter Radiation from CO2 on Air Temperature during Heating in a Simulated Earth/Atmosphere Experiment

The change in observed backscatter radiation should give us a measurable temperature increase of 2.4 to 4 K by using the Stefan Boltzmann law. But we only observe a very slight temperature increase due to CO2 backscatter. This indicates that heating, due to IR backscatter from CO2, is much less than what is assumed from the Stefan Boltzmann law or from the forcing Equation (1a) and Equation (1b). The near-identical heating curves for all the three gases indicate that the thermal energy transfer is only driven by the temperature of the back wall of the rear chamber. Without extra heating of the walls in the rear chamber, the air temperature cannot increase. These findings might question the fundament of the forcing laws used by the IPCC.

Added CO2 in the atmosphere is not doing what they expected, or what is necessary to cause any warming, much les the majority of the observed
warming.

 

[Lord of Planar]

What lies? At this point it would be very difficult for someone to publish a study
saying that CO2 is not the majority cause of warming since 1978.
Here is one I am surprised made it through.
The Influence of IR Absorption and Backscatter Radiation from CO2 on Air Temperature during Heating in a Simulated Earth/Atmosphere Experiment

Added CO2 in the atmosphere is not doing what they expected, or what is necessary to cause any warming, much les the majority of the observed
warming.

The agenda's narrative is falling apart with better science.

 

[Steve Case]

According to S & P Global, ExxonMobil (XOM), Chevron (CVX), ConocoPhillips (CPP), EOG Resources (EOG) and Schlumberger (SLB) — have raked in more than $250 billion in profits between 2021 and 2023.

Who is getting paid extremely well???

"A Friedman doctrine‐-
The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits"
Milton Friedman NY Times 1970

 

[Sandokan]

"The most extreme event in US climatic history"

Tony Heller Posted March 10, 2024

Climate experts described a pleasant February day in parts of the US as "The most extreme event in US climatic history"

Tony Heller through temperature graphs debunked the climate experts that say that February 28th of 2024 was the most extreme event in US climate history. He responded to the “climate experts” propaganda with real documentation. Check it out.

 

[Threegoofs]

Tony Heller through temperature graphs debunked the climate experts that say that February 28th of 2024 was the most extreme event in US climate history. He responded to the “climate experts” propaganda with real documentation. Check it out.

Bot schedule is uninterrupted.