Believe as you wish. The evidence has been provided in the past that indicates it is possibly effective as a preventative measure. Not a cure. Your posts are related to using it after already contracting COVID.
Wrong! Most of the beach sand replenishment projects started after warming started to ramp up in the mid 80s. Looks like you are just as ignorant as Tony.
Yeah, I do. It is stupid denialist BS.Too bad you have no answer for this:
My assumed sensitivity to CO2
I have pondered this question for some time regarding CO2 sensitivity. I am going to float the idea of a very simple model and it produces a sensitivity of 0.7 degrees of warming for a doubling of CO2. It's actually quite simple. No complex modeling needed. Not all the variables are linear, in...debatepolitics.com
Yes, I understand Buzz. You lack the intelligence to read what I wrote, and disagree with it in any intelligent manner.
No.. no it’s definitely not effective as a preventative measure. Or a cure. And the evidence in the past was poor quality and known as such by experts - yanno - people who understand science (unlike yourself).
www.mayoclinic.org
No, you fail. Especially when you try to pretend you understand science better than the people who are actually studying it. Climate or wingnut HCQ theories - you fall for anything that you prefer to believe, rather than what the evidence shows.
Believe as you wish:
floridainsider.com
www.theguardian.com
Again, you are providing threads for "treatment." Not "prevention."No.. no it’s definitely not effective as a preventative measure. Or a cure. And the evidence in the past was poor quality and known as such by experts - yanno - people who understand science (unlike yourself).
Is hydroxychloroquine a treatment for COVID-19?
Hydroxychloroquine does not treat coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) or prevent infection with the virus that causes COVID-19.
“Hydroxychloroquine is not recommended as a treatment for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Also, hydroxychloroquine doesn't prevent infection with the virus that causes COVID-19”
No, you fail. Especially when you try to pretend you understand science better than the people who are actually studying it. Climate or wingnut HCQ theories - you fall for anything that you prefer to believe, rather than what the evidence shows.
You are pretty consistent on this. Consistently wrong.
Not quite sure what ‘doesn’t prevent infection with the virus that causes COVID-19’ means to you.
Wow.
You have yet to show you understand what they say. All I ever see, is you repeating pundits and bloggers.
Yes, I am confident. I know what I know and understand there are many things I don't know. My knowledge is not faith-based like yours is. Mine is firmly rooted I science.
You’re ALL faith based.
www.nature.com
Where is the money quote?You’re ALL faith based.
You just pretend you can grasp the science, and then mentally masturbate the concepts until you produce what you want to believe.
The HCQ issue is completely and utterly dead- not from ‘faith’ but absolute facts.
The ‘myth of Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) as post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for the prevention of COVID-19’ is far from reality - Scientific Reports
The efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) as post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for the prevention of COVID-19 was contentious. In this randomized control double-blind clinical trial, asymptomatic individuals with direct contact with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases were randomized into PEP/HCQ...
And guidelines are quite clear too:
Recommendation 3: In persons exposed to COVID-19, the IDSA guideline panel recommends against hydroxychloroquine.
This, of course is tangential to climate, but it illustrates an important point.
You don’t know shit, but think you’re a talented coprologist.
LOL.
Why are you still responding to this drone when he makes even Watsup sound like Carl Sagan ?
Black clouds are describe as carbon pollution by the Union of Concert Scientist. In reality they are shadows behind condense water vapor. But the US government describe it as climate pollution. In reality, “Carbon dioxide is a colorless, odorless gas which forms the basis of all life on earth.”
In the video, Tony discuss some techniques use by the press to deceive the people about climate change. He mention a couple of articles about glaciers melting and sea level risen, attacked by carbon dioxide that also attack blacks and poor people and it is an evil gas. In reality the glacier are increasing and the sea level rising has been greatly overestimated. When their predictions fail, the academics moved their prediction from the year 2000 to 2020, they simple moved the goal post.
"The press" does not accurately portray the climate situation. Fox News, perhaps the most-watched news outlet, continually and completely ignores the causes of, and dangers of, carbon pollution. Tens of millions of Fox viewers never see the content of the other outlets that make only a meager mention of the unfolding emergency. And deception? How about the dishonest absurdity of the "clean coal" media campaign? Even the so-called "liberal" media took money for airing those lies.
Please explain to us the dangers of carbon pollution in science terms.
debatepolitics.com
If in the 1850’s someone projected the limits on growth, the boundary conditions they described would be limited to their understanding of technology at that point, and not included the massive increase in technological advancement.More details on the level of non-renewable natural resources, which is linked to environmental impact:
The Limits to Growth
The Limits to Growth - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Have you read this book? What can you say about it 40 years after its publishing? Thanks in advance. :)
The press is always trying to scare people about Greenland melting. The reality is that billions of tons of new ice and snow has been accumulating in Greenland, as the graph shows. Michael Mann’s hockey stick erase the medieval warm period and the little ice age and shows glacier melting during the coldest century. The bigger the lie, the bigger the grant. So, unlike climate alarmists, ice does not lie.
Its impossible to know the whole story when it comes to these studies and instrument data. However we do know the long history of the sea level as measured by man even before modern instrumentation. Overall, the sea level is rising, but it is o slow the rate doesn't matter. The AGW cult likes to claim it's acceleration to dangerous levels. It probably is acceleration a little, but they have no proof of any dangerous rate, and they lie so frequently, I do not trust them at their word.
The sea level has been rising at an average rate of 3.4mm or one eighth of an inch annually for the last 7,000 years, and it is not the result of melting ice. Sea levels are continuing to rise due to post-glacial rebounding. If you look at sea levels north of 45°N you will find that they are mostly falling. Skagway, Alaska is already more than 2 meters higher in elevation than it was when the US purchased Alaska in 1867. This is happening across the global, in Canada, Norway, Finland, and Russia. Everywhere there were huge ice sheets over a mile thick covering the land, that land has been rebounding for the last 15,000 years.
Yes, we agree. That id another thing they deny about the science. That se level rises have been occurring all this time since coming out of the last glacial period.
The MSM in collusion with the government is creating a fake story to vilify fossil fuels. They say that July 4th was the planet hottest day on record. Temperature data of many world places are make up by government agencies. In 1978, meteorologists conclude that “there is no end in sight to the cooling on the last 30 years.”
Tony demonstrate that prior temperature record grafts are different from the modified versions now. The prior grafts shows a cooling trend from 1921 to 1979, but the modified versions show the opposite. The agencies have very little historic data outside of U.S., Easter Europe and parts of Australia, and don’t know the land and ocean temperatures from the past. This is the biggest scam in Science History and they know it.