I would be inclined to agree with you on this point.
There's a difference between being accused of such things, and actually being such things.
At present, we have allot of the former, and none of the latter, IMHO.
So by definition the Democrats are not “National Socialists”, and there no “colonization” or “invasion”. Glad to see you admit it.Colonization is what the invaders are doing to America, with full support of Antisemites in the National Socialist democrat party.
Yes, and lies are just that, lies.
Ain’t that the truth!They grabbed 'em all - race card, gender card, environmentalism card, covid health card, you-work-for-russia card, etc
credit card - don't forget that one - it's how they pay for everything
That's why they're literally a house of cards now, falling apart
CHAZ/CHOP was an outright insurrection, in fact treason per the Constitution, waging war against the United States.
Obviously the uprising by foreign nationals in Los Angeles fits the description of insurrection far better.
That's a blatant lie. Massive changes were made.
The issue with Rampart is that they were in bed with the gangs - corrupt up to the rafters. The gangs had bought a paid for them.
John and Ken on KFI had the best coverage, but here is a Communist source so you can't complain of bias.
This is an immigration (i.e., Federal matter).
Remember when the SCOTUS told an Republican Arizona governor she couldn't enforce immigration law, even though Washington wasn't doing anything? Therefore Trump is within his authority to act, and that's what ICE is doing. However there is interference going on, consequently Trump has the power to provide protection for federal actions being taken by ICE (i.e., US Marines). Anyone else getting involved (according to SCOTUS) is violating the Constitution. That windbag Newsom could be restrained legally if he takes any action against the Marines or ICE, because he has zero jurisdiction. If Newson doesn't stop the riots, and they interfere with federal efforts on immigration, the Marines can act to protect themselves and other federal authorities.
'Near coup'? Seriously?Why? We are only five years removed from a near coup,
and nothing has changed to strengthen those guardrails. They have only gotten weaker. trump now has a 100% compliant VP and AG. Vance would have done what Pence wouldn't.
Correction, no one wanted to debate the leftist nonsense push narratives you are parroting.Earlier I presented a pretty convincing list of why trump is an authoritarian. Nobody wanted to debate the points.
From your citation 'New York Times reports', of cherry picked 35 legal scholars, of the same vein as those in the judicial branch who are over reaching in their decisions against the Trump administration because of their politics.34 out of 35 Scholars Agree: Trump is a Lawless Authoritarian
Cornell Law professor Michael C. Dorf evaluates the constitutional and legal abuses committed by Donald Trump during his second term as president, based on a New York Times survey of 35 legal scholars...verdict.justia.com
The political danger for idiots like Newsom and Karen Bass is they will quickly run out of empty statements to rationalize the criminal behavior of rioters who really don't give a shit about migrants and whether they are here illegally.I would be inclined to agree with you on this point.
There's a difference between being accused of such things, and actually being such things.
At present, we have allot of the former, and none of the latter, IMHO.
That there is so much of the former directly aligns with the left's continue, and largely ineffectual, constant false accusations, for one, and for two, their precipitous falling in the polls, although they have yet to connect those two things in any real or meaningful way is also telling the tale of how insular, hive mind, their thinking is.
Maybe one day they'll rub their two brain cells together and come up with that connection. Until they do, it'll only be more of the same for them as they have from the election to the present day.
You wrote: "the Republican-controlled congress is deciding who gets to be president."I haven't lost faith in either our laws or our Constitution. But I do recognize their limitations, which have been on full display ever since trump tried to overturn a valid election. A few falsified documents here, a little cooperation from Pence there, and suddenly the Republican-controlled congress is deciding who gets to be president. At best, it's a Constitutional crisis that might take years to untangle, at worst it's a full coup d'etat.
Our "guardrails" have only gotten weaker since then.
Since "expect" is too strong a word, let's say that I hope that people do a bit of research before posting. If you claim that the N.Y. state legal system is a circus, then let's see some evidence. If the trial was a sham, explain why and bring a receipt or two.
As for myself, I try hard not to talk out of my ass. If you look through my posts, I think you'll find that I back them up with citations when possible.
No way your plan does anything other than encourage more illegal immigration.Serious question for you:
Why?
If they are not criminal, if they are not engaging in criminal activity, if they are working, if they are paying taxes (or willing to pay taxes), if they are - other than their immigration status - otherwise contributing members of the community…why?
Fine those individuals. Fine any employer they work for. Then give them a list of what they need to do in order to attain a legal status. A status that doesn’t give them voting rights, etc - a green card status - so they can work here and live here.
To me? If they’ve violated immigration laws, then I’m fine with them not having a path to citizenship and being able to vote(This does not apply to children - they can have a path to citizenship. They didn’t make the decision to come here, someone else chose for them)
You are not fighting anyone. Who do you think you are fooling.“Afraid” is not the emotion I’m seeing appalled, infuriated, over it would all be more apt.
You want a king. Follower genes.
We do not.
Hopefully we won’t have to fight about it.
It is apparent it is not fashionable to demean you in any way.
You’re like the George Clooney of the DP bloggers. Can do no wrong.
Should? No.
That there are legal grounds and justifications for doing so? Maybe. Quite likely, actually.
The moment cities, counties and states declared themselves to be sanctuary locations, an escalation collision course was set, because there was going to be a day where the federal government wasn't going to put up with this lawlessness, was going to enforce federal laws in those locations over the objections (AKA the rioting and lawlessness we now see in LA - although it could have been any sanctuary location).
Enforcing federal immigration laws isn't controversial.
It is the escalation from the left, as we are now seeing in LA, which has made it controversial.
Hopefully MAGA!You are not fighting anyone. Who do you think you are fooling.
It seems you missed a very, very simple point. You stated that they are human beings, as if that makes them good. Though, being a human being isn't a factor at all in a person being good or bad.Are you seriously comparing the entire population of illegal immigrants in the U.S. to Hitler, Stalin, and Dahmer?
Is this really how you Trump supporters view these migrants?
You guys really think the illegal immigrants are as bad as Hitler, Stalin, and Dahmer?
More recent polling.
Do you have a favorable or an unfavorable opinion of Donald Trump? | Daily Question
Do you have a favorable or an unfavorable opinion of Donald Trump?today.yougov.com
————
—————
Only a third of Americans are backing the LA protests over the ICE raids, poll finds
Only a third of Americans are backing the LA protests over the ICE raids, poll finds
The Trump administration has ramped up its response after protests against sweeping immigration action broke out across Los Angeles over the weekendwww.yahoo.com
Much to agree with in your post here.The political danger for idiots like Newsom and Karen Bass is they will quickly run out of empty statements to rationalize the criminal behavior of rioters who really don't give a shit about migrants and whether they are here illegally.
The more stupid things they say to try to lessen the criminal culpability of the criminal thugs on the street, the more the public will realize Democrat politicians who support sanctuary cities and laws that forbid local police from working with ICE have no authority to manage blue states or major cities.
What federal statute might city personnel be violating by, for example, not calling ICE when an illegal reports a crime to them or testifies as a witness in a trial?On balance, the sanctuary cities are violating federal law and should face both civil and criminal penalties.
It's not the amount of money, it's the purpose that money is being used for.
In the case the case of CHIRLA and the over $33 million received from government grants, it is being used to tear down rule of law and the US society, two of Soros' favorite causes.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?