• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

ICE Imprisons Danish Dad of 4 at Citizenship Interview

That is a poor sop. You presume our nation will be able to conduct free and fair elections in 2026 with a hostile Federal government overseeing them. I have my doubts. And even if Democrats sweep...so what? There is no legislative immunity from Federal prosecution that protects the political opposition from trumped-up charges in other countries. Trump can just have Democrats arrested for any number of spurious reasons. And even if they impeach and convict him, if he refuses to leave, what can be done?
Exactly.
 
Did you have to dig up a thesaurus for that response? :D 🍿
Simply literate.

And . . . these days remembering and applying long unused words is something of a fun game. Want to try making a retort a cut above the sophomoric?
 
"ICE has imprisoned a Danish father of four due to a “paperwork miscommunication,” his American wife said.

Kasper Juul Eriksen, a 32-year-old welder legally in the country with a fifth child on the way, was detained by ICE during a citizenship appointment on April 15 because of a decade-old “paperwork miscommunication,” his wife said.

Savanah Eriksen said they were blindsided when they arrived in Memphis, Tennessee, at what they believed would be a routine interview in the “final stage of obtaining his permanent American citizenship.”

After driving three hours north from their home in Sturgis, Mississippi, Savannah said her husband was confronted by ICE agents who took him into custody and explained there was a paperwork error dating back to 2015. He was then taken to an ICE detention facility in rural Jena, Louisiana, where he remains today."

Other than to burnish their credentials as an equal opportunity gestapo, why would ICE do this?

Why such cruelty?

In B4 photoshopped image of Danish dude with MS13 tattooed on his knuckles in times new roman surfaces.
 
"No explanation," but she somehow knows it's a "paperwork miscommunication" and specifically from what year?
Their attorney probably has that information....they aren't responsible for the miscommunication...that would be USCIS that is required to keep their shit straight.
 
You have no way of knowing what is mandated in this case because you have no idea what the case is about.
I have heard immigration attorneys on several podcasts discuss the issue, and they all agreed that arresting and detaining him was not necessary.

ICE is not behaving as it used to. What is now commonplance used to be unheard of.

This story: https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-ice-traps-people-outside-194823718.html

Immigration attorney Issac Ortega told the Arizona Mirror that several masked agents, who refused to identify themselves as officers with Immigration and Customs Enforcement, arrested his client after his first immigration hearing.

Masked "officers" refusing to identify themselves? Removing people to distant locations? Not charging them but just holding them?

This sort of thing never used to happen in the United States and it's unconscionable and unAmerican.
 
Last edited:
Surprised to see that they're going after white foreigners, too. Looks like nobody is safe in tRump's America.

He's white - that part checks out.

His problem? He's a lowly welder. Sucks for him he's not a billionaire fin-bro or crypto-bro.
 
I have heard immigration attorneys on several podcasts discuss the issue, and they all agreed that arresting and detaining him was not necessary.
And why should I think they know any more details about this case than are so far publicly available? If all they know is what's been said by the family, then they have no idea why the guy was picked up and are in no position to make such claims.
 
And why should I think they know any more details about this case than are so far publicly available? If all they know is what's been said by the family, then they have no idea why the guy was picked up and are in no position to make such claims.
Because they said that a paperwork/clerical error does not mandate hand, copying someone and dragging them away.
 
Back
Top Bottom